Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Minister of Trolling


Jeremy Igo

Recommended Posts

14 hours ago, Mr. Scot said:

It has little to do with "different points of view".

He's made up numerous lies, pretended to have inside sources, posted quotes that weren't actually said by who he claimed, recently posted what he claimed was his own insight when it was actually parroting something Ron Rivera said earlier in the season and various other bulls--t.

So yes, he's a troll, and given that his style mirrors someone else's trolling style pretty closely, I think I may know whose alt he is.

 

13 hours ago, uncfan888 said:

I'm fine with him being a minority, but he constantly spams the board with his opinions and offers these extremely long arguments that don't really make much sense when you actually think about them.  It's like he's trying to win people to his way of thinking, but no one is buying it 

What CPK does, is not trolling.  He gives his opinion, as flawed as it may be, and that's about it.  He typically stays on topic, and doesn't derail threads.  People call him out, call him names, whatever, and he ignores it.  That's not how trolls operate.  

Yes, his posts are long, flawed, and sound ignorant to most sane people.  I think he really believes what he puts out there though, and you shouldn't ban someone for feeling a certain way, or having a different opinion, even if it is extreme.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

What CPK does, is not trolling.  He gives his opinion, as flawed as it may be, and that's about it.  He typically stays on topic, and doesn't derail threads.  People call him out, call him names, whatever, and he ignores it.  That's not how trolls operate.  

Yes, his posts are long, flawed, and sound ignorant to most sane people.  I think he really believes what he puts out there though, and you shouldn't ban someone for feeling a certain way, or having a different opinion, even if it is extreme.  


I dunno...it's hard to believe that somebody who sounds ignorant to MOST sane people isn't doing it purposely.


Sent from my iPhone using CarolinaHuddle
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, My Goodness My Guinness said:

I dunno...it's hard to believe that somebody who sounds ignorant to MOST sane people isn't doing it purposely.

I probably could have worded it a little differently, but I think the point is made well enough.  I just think he really believes what he says.  He doesn't exhibit troll behavior.  I could just be a dick, and say, "dumb ass  troll,"  but that wouldn't be very nice...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 hours ago, motocross_cat said:

@The Huddler

 

/thread.

I would love to have this position 

 

but im busy AF and id only take it if i would be a MOD

 

i do love calling out bullsshit and id love to see this place cleaned up. 

 

The Panthers suck AND this joint is getting unreadable

 

more and more new posters creating flailing threads of sshit vomit and despair and i see less and less of posters who ive seen on here a long time who i know are loyal dedicated fans  

 

we may disagree a lot but i realky respect a dude on here who i know is a loyal fan and loves the panthers as much as i do

 

i miss the old huddle

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I'm going to be real, the reason that vote ended up so lop-sided by the end was directly due to my programming. So there's nothing tongue in cheek about it. Also I left PFF after the Collinsworth acquisition (didn't want to move to Cincy) but have stayed involved in analytics via backdoor channels, but I can absolutely say that the experience was eye-opening, not because those guys are unquestionable football savants and that I became one by proxy, but because the amount of information that becomes available outside of what the typical fan has access to is revelatory and also really drives home how much context is still being missed even with all of that information. You don't discover that you know everything, you discover how much you still can't know no matter how hard you try, hence my point about the NFL not being able to figure out what makes a QB good. There's a lot of AI work going into that now and even that only seems to further confuse things vs. actually enlighten the problem. In the professional realm teams don't really talk about quarterbacks as A strictly being better than B, but how A can potentially perform better than B given a specific context of C. Of course those contexts may be wider for A than B, but there's also contexts where B can outshine A, even with lesser talent surrounding them. So what good teams strive to do is ultimately define a process of how they want their entire team to operate under schematically, find players that fit that scheme, and hopefully find a guy whose skillset will be maximized running that scheme with those players. Where bad teams fall of the wagon is constantly shifting those schemes and chasing bad fits or fads vs. sticking with a core identity and developing it.
    • there is a 100 mile long list of NFL players and coaches going to bat and defending horrible play from teammates.   
    • In 6 games, we've only had 6 hurries??? ... that can't be accurate
×
×
  • Create New...