Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Who would you least want to win the Super Bowl?


Cyberjag

Who would you least want to win the Super Bowl?  

110 members have voted

  1. 1. Who would you least want to win the Super Bowl? You can choose more than one.

    • New England Patriots
      35
    • Dallas Cowboys
      40
    • Pittsburgh Steelers
      15
    • Atlanta Falcons
      77
    • Green Bay Packers
      6
    • Kansas City Chiefs
      3
    • Seattle Seahawks
      33
    • New York Giants
      4
    • Detroit Lions
      1
    • Houston Texans
      1
    • Miami Dolphins
      1
    • Oakland Raiders
      2


Recommended Posts

1 minute ago, TheRed said:

Falcons, and honestly it isn't even close. Being the only team in the division without a Lombardi trophy would be quite pathetic.

Big picture you're probably right.  But thinking about Pete Carroll, Russell Wilson, Frank Clark, etc., as well as those fans in the kooky northwest and beyond is equally unbearable in the short term.  I'm done thinking about it because neither are even going to the big game I don't think.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

dallas cowboys by far. I don't like the falcons but let's be real they never won anything. The media would hype them, but nothing like the cowboys. If the cowboys win the NFL network, and ESPN might as well change their name to the cowboys network. It would be constant reports like, does Jerry Jones has sh*t stains in his panties?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, emhoward said:

They practically had a party on their forum when we lost.

 

21 minutes ago, CPF4LIFE said:

Falcons hands down. You think they weren't praying for us to lose last year?? 

Pleading the 5th here. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Dallas with Falcons close 2nd.

Itd suck to be the only team in the division without a ring

 

Dallas-  would be bad.  As much media hype at they get.  If they even make it to the super bowl.  ESPN 2 is going to become ESPND for Dallas.  Good luck getting into Walmart because they will be stocking those Dallas shirts by the truck load and the lines of the "we dem boys" fans who cant point out dallas on a texas map will look like black friday. Despite only winning 1-2 playoff games the last 20 years they will imediately be Crowned the top NFL organization ever by every network.  Goodell will be seen holding hands with Jerry Jones on the float leading the victory parade being shown on every major sports network.  AND if we start off to a bad start next year, you will see loads of Zeke and Dak jerseys in BOA (and some Romo jerseys because a few still think and convinced hes starting for Dallas despite breaking his collar bone week 1 starting for the Jets)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Giants

I do not plan on watching any of it so I did it based on the people in my life who are the fans of the remaining teams.  Of those people both of the ones that are annoying about sports are Giants fans so I prefer not to have to listen to them.

The friends that were most supportive of me during/after out season last year were my Pats and Lions friends so I hope one of them win.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • A lot of young QB's struggle with holding on to the ball top long. He has gotten better progressively in that regard. Pocket Time(in Sec):  2.5(2023), 2.3(2024), 2.2(2025) Time to Throw(in Sec): 2.9(2023), 2.79(2024), 2.82(2025) The divedends have been fairly small, is the issue.
    • I'm firing DC, though I think it actually makes the job less attractive. He's not prepared to be a HC and it's showed. A new HC is not going to be tied automatically to BY. He's going to want to bring in some level of competition in the QB room because anyone who has ever watched football knows our QB room is lacking. If he doesn't, that tells a more interesting tale of who's really calling the shots.  Dave hasn't been decisive enough in game and that leadership council BS has trust fall vibes. Our offense has been pathetically stale and vanilla. Our run game while good has made no sense based on who has been playing best. Our defense is improved but they can't be expected to hold opposing teams to below 17 a game because our offense can't score consistently.  We've beaten some teams we shouldn't have beaten, specifically GB and the Rams, and I think our record doesn’t accurately reflect where the team and the coaching really is. We've fallen flat against a geriatric rookie QB leading a 2-10 NO team and got our ass handed to us TWICE. We're unprepared for the biggest games.  This is what happens though when real coaching candidates turn down interviews because your owner is a narcissistic butthole. You get someone no one else bothered to call and you get the results everyone else would have expected if they had. 
    • The Saints would be 2-12 if not for us. We are 50% of their wins. A organization serious about the playoffs does not get bullied by a sh*t team like the Saints TWICE. It's over my brotha. 
×
×
  • Create New...