Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Who would you least want to win the Super Bowl?


Cyberjag

Who would you least want to win the Super Bowl?  

110 members have voted

  1. 1. Who would you least want to win the Super Bowl? You can choose more than one.

    • New England Patriots
      35
    • Dallas Cowboys
      40
    • Pittsburgh Steelers
      15
    • Atlanta Falcons
      77
    • Green Bay Packers
      6
    • Kansas City Chiefs
      3
    • Seattle Seahawks
      33
    • New York Giants
      4
    • Detroit Lions
      1
    • Houston Texans
      1
    • Miami Dolphins
      1
    • Oakland Raiders
      2


Recommended Posts

1 minute ago, TheRed said:

Falcons, and honestly it isn't even close. Being the only team in the division without a Lombardi trophy would be quite pathetic.

Big picture you're probably right.  But thinking about Pete Carroll, Russell Wilson, Frank Clark, etc., as well as those fans in the kooky northwest and beyond is equally unbearable in the short term.  I'm done thinking about it because neither are even going to the big game I don't think.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

dallas cowboys by far. I don't like the falcons but let's be real they never won anything. The media would hype them, but nothing like the cowboys. If the cowboys win the NFL network, and ESPN might as well change their name to the cowboys network. It would be constant reports like, does Jerry Jones has sh*t stains in his panties?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, emhoward said:

They practically had a party on their forum when we lost.

 

21 minutes ago, CPF4LIFE said:

Falcons hands down. You think they weren't praying for us to lose last year?? 

Pleading the 5th here. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Dallas with Falcons close 2nd.

Itd suck to be the only team in the division without a ring

 

Dallas-  would be bad.  As much media hype at they get.  If they even make it to the super bowl.  ESPN 2 is going to become ESPND for Dallas.  Good luck getting into Walmart because they will be stocking those Dallas shirts by the truck load and the lines of the "we dem boys" fans who cant point out dallas on a texas map will look like black friday. Despite only winning 1-2 playoff games the last 20 years they will imediately be Crowned the top NFL organization ever by every network.  Goodell will be seen holding hands with Jerry Jones on the float leading the victory parade being shown on every major sports network.  AND if we start off to a bad start next year, you will see loads of Zeke and Dak jerseys in BOA (and some Romo jerseys because a few still think and convinced hes starting for Dallas despite breaking his collar bone week 1 starting for the Jets)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Giants

I do not plan on watching any of it so I did it based on the people in my life who are the fans of the remaining teams.  Of those people both of the ones that are annoying about sports are Giants fans so I prefer not to have to listen to them.

The friends that were most supportive of me during/after out season last year were my Pats and Lions friends so I hope one of them win.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • You joke, but it can always be worse. He might walk with a limp or need assistance. Different sport, but Lonzo Ball couldn't even walk up steps a year after his injury.
    • I mean... a lot of the information that could've helped set better expectations has always been out there: There was no RB on the team under contract for the 2025 - 2026 season except for Miles Sanders. The team did not have a second round pick going into the 2025 season due to the trade for Young. Chuba's extension did not happen until the beginning of November. Jonathon Brooks was the clear RB1 in the class with a massive gap between RB1 & RB2. Example: Dane Brugler had Brooks as RB1, overall #48; Blake Corum was RB2, #81 overall. The Giants held pick #47 and had just lost Saquon Barkley to the Eagles in free agency. They were going to take Brooks had the Panthers not jumped in front of them. So if we're framing things with that context: Chuba was expected to be RB1 Miles (at the time) was RB2 Brooks was essentially RB3, stashed for rehab in 2024 with a long runway. The original injury occurred Nov 2023 while the re-injury occurred December 2024. That is right in the high-risk window for recurrence, especially in explosive athletes. The fact that it also happened on a non-contact play suggests possible biomechanical issues such as muscle imbalance, rather than a failed surgery (or bad decision-making).   NFL teams invest heavily in medically vetting prospects. If there had been a clear red flag in imaging or recovery markers, the team is going to find it. This sucks and the Panthers have sucked, yes, but this wasn't blind optimism or malpractice by the front office. It was a calculated decision based on the roster, draft capital, positional scarcity, etc.
    • Yep, but they can all rotate with Brown, Brown and Robinson (sounds like a law firm). Can't continue to have Derrick Brown out there for 90+ percent of the defensive snaps. An injury was bound to happen. 
×
×
  • Create New...