Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Who would you least want to win the Super Bowl?


Cyberjag

Who would you least want to win the Super Bowl?  

110 members have voted

  1. 1. Who would you least want to win the Super Bowl? You can choose more than one.

    • New England Patriots
      35
    • Dallas Cowboys
      40
    • Pittsburgh Steelers
      15
    • Atlanta Falcons
      77
    • Green Bay Packers
      6
    • Kansas City Chiefs
      3
    • Seattle Seahawks
      33
    • New York Giants
      4
    • Detroit Lions
      1
    • Houston Texans
      1
    • Miami Dolphins
      1
    • Oakland Raiders
      2


Recommended Posts

1 minute ago, TheRed said:

Falcons, and honestly it isn't even close. Being the only team in the division without a Lombardi trophy would be quite pathetic.

Big picture you're probably right.  But thinking about Pete Carroll, Russell Wilson, Frank Clark, etc., as well as those fans in the kooky northwest and beyond is equally unbearable in the short term.  I'm done thinking about it because neither are even going to the big game I don't think.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

dallas cowboys by far. I don't like the falcons but let's be real they never won anything. The media would hype them, but nothing like the cowboys. If the cowboys win the NFL network, and ESPN might as well change their name to the cowboys network. It would be constant reports like, does Jerry Jones has sh*t stains in his panties?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, emhoward said:

They practically had a party on their forum when we lost.

 

21 minutes ago, CPF4LIFE said:

Falcons hands down. You think they weren't praying for us to lose last year?? 

Pleading the 5th here. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Dallas with Falcons close 2nd.

Itd suck to be the only team in the division without a ring

 

Dallas-  would be bad.  As much media hype at they get.  If they even make it to the super bowl.  ESPN 2 is going to become ESPND for Dallas.  Good luck getting into Walmart because they will be stocking those Dallas shirts by the truck load and the lines of the "we dem boys" fans who cant point out dallas on a texas map will look like black friday. Despite only winning 1-2 playoff games the last 20 years they will imediately be Crowned the top NFL organization ever by every network.  Goodell will be seen holding hands with Jerry Jones on the float leading the victory parade being shown on every major sports network.  AND if we start off to a bad start next year, you will see loads of Zeke and Dak jerseys in BOA (and some Romo jerseys because a few still think and convinced hes starting for Dallas despite breaking his collar bone week 1 starting for the Jets)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Giants

I do not plan on watching any of it so I did it based on the people in my life who are the fans of the remaining teams.  Of those people both of the ones that are annoying about sports are Giants fans so I prefer not to have to listen to them.

The friends that were most supportive of me during/after out season last year were my Pats and Lions friends so I hope one of them win.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • That's my biggest concern with making him the 2C.  You split up the Aho Jarvis bromance that accounted for a lot of points.  If Jarvis excels as a C, it could help the team even more though.
    • The Saints being that high is the one that killed me. Chris Olave might not know his name at this point, Shaheed is coming off injury as well, so 31 year old Brandin Cooks might be your best WR...coming off a 260 yard season over 10 games. Kamara is Kamara, but didn't have 1,000 yards last year and is about to turn 30.  Toss in the fact that Taysom Hill may be the best QB on the team and I truly don't understand Barnwell's thoughts beside seeing the names "Olave" and "Kamara" and going yep, that sounds better than "Chuba" and "Thielen". 
    • Now now now, I wouldn't say there is no logic, but there's just not a lot of in-depth thought put into Barnwell's  "analysis." Now to be fair to him (and other national writers), pre-season team rankings are basically clickbait. And...Barnwell, himself, said that "there's a lot of projection here." He basically admits that he doesn't know how the hell things are going to turn out with our receiver group. He also said that "I find myself" more intrigued by Coker than Legette; that does not mean that he said that fans should be, or that Coker will even be better than Legette (regardless of ESPN's per-route-run stat). So, yeah, Barnwell said some things, but even he has to basically admit that he doesn't know how bad or good that our playmakers will be in 2025.  Overall, what Barnwell is basically thinking is that the Panthers have gotten worse at the offensive skill positions, and baked into that is that others have gotten better. That's the argument in July (meaning, please don't give this any more weight than it's due). I would personally be surprised (not shocked) if we end up worse than the Titans, Pats and Giants at least. Once you throw in the Bills, Giants, Jets, Steelers, and even the Chargers, I personally think there are several teams' skill groups that may end up ranked lower than ours by the end of 2025.  @kungfoodudeis one of my dudes, but like others he is over the tipping point. He's had enough. Seeing is believing. I will say this though: Barnwell's piece is less about logic than just good ol' opinion. And to be honest, he might as well be a Huddler throwing out sh¡t in the summer based upon nothing but good feels or bad feels.  Our offense as a whole (just like any other team's) is going to depend upon the play of the O-line and especially the QB. How you can even rank the skill positions without expressly baking those two things in the cake is beyond me. I would dare say that that's not even logical. 
×
×
  • Create New...