Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

3 Potential Cap Casualties For the Carolina Panthers in 2017


TheSpecialJuan

Recommended Posts

Defensive End Paul Soliai

 

Of the few free agents the Panthers added in 2016, Soliai was the priciest and most disappointing. The former Falcon signed a two-year, $6.5 million deal with $3 million guaranteed.

Because the Panthers were so unimpressed, Soliai rotated on and off the inactive list with Kyle Love during the final two months of the season.

Soliai was never going to put up big stats, but he finished with just eight tackles and no sacks.

  • 2017 cap hit: $3.5 million
  • Dead money: $1.0 million
  • Savings: $2.5 million
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Quote

Running Back Jonathan Stewart

 

For the record, I can't imagine a run-first team will part ways with their only legit runner. But Stewart's had a contract many have been watching for a while and it's not like Gettleman is afraid to make a surprising decision with someone who's spent his entire career in Carolina.

This is the first offseason the Panthers won't face a dead money hit of at least $13 million if they offloaded Stewart, who's going into the final year of a five-year, $36.5 million deal.

There's no need to relive his injury history, but Stewart's missed "only" six games since he became a workhorse back at the start of 2015 and he played as hard as anyone down the stretch of this lost season.

Stewart turns 30 in March, a number that usually signals a decline at his position, but years of rotating with DeAngelo Williams could make Stewart slightly younger than most 30-year-old backs.

This is incredi-stupid. If anything, let the current contract play out.

Quote

There's no need to relive his injury history, but Stewart's missed "only" six games since he became a workhorse back at the start of 2015 and he played as hard as anyone down the stretch of this lost season.

I guess Kuechly is gone, too.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Ive been calling for this to be the year stew is cut for a while. We, recently, have forgotten how injury prone he is.

However, his running towards the end of the hear may save him... even if we do draft Cook or Fournette.

Sent from my SM-G930P using CarolinaHuddle mobile app

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Lol at injury prone. 

I wish fans understood not only the NFL,  but how brutal some positions are over others. 

Stew has never been injury prone, but i know fans love to throw "injury prone" out there for any player that gets hurt more than once, in this gladiator sport that we love.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Lol at injury prone. 

I wish fans understood not only the NFL,  but how brutal some positions are over others. 

Stew has never been injury prone, but i know fans love to throw "injury prone" out there for any player that gets hurt more than once, in this gladiator sport that we love.


Really?

08-11 he only missed 2 games while splitting carries with DWill... not as the primary

Missed 7 games in 12
Missed 10 in 13
3 in 14
3 in 15
And
3 in 16

Past 5 years the guy has missed 26 full games. This does not count the games he left due to the injury.

Thats almost 1/3 of the year, on average, each year...

You saying this is common for the position?

Well, I decided to look...

http://www.profootballlogic.com/articles/nfl-injury-rate-analysis/

These stats for 2015

It agrees that RB is the most injured position, not by a landslide, but says that the average games a RB is available is 13.3 (most other positions in the 14 range)

So, I would say that stew is solidly below average in the past 5 years... closer to average over the past 2.

Sent from my SM-G930P using CarolinaHuddle mobile app

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Really?

08-11 he only missed 2 games while splitting carries with DWill... not as the primary

Missed 7 games in 12

Missed 10 in 13

3 in 14

3 in 15

And

3 in 16

Past 5 years the guy has missed 26 full games. This does not count the games he left due to the injury.

Thats almost 1/3 of the year, on average, each year...

You saying this is common for the position?

Well, I decided to look...

http://www.profootballlogic.com/articles/nfl-injury-rate-analysis/

These stats for 2015

It agrees that RB is the most injured position, not by a landslide, but says that the average games a RB is available is 13.3 (most other positions in the 14 range)

So, I would say that stew is solidly below average in the past 5 years... closer to average over the past 2.

Sent from my SM-G930P using CarolinaHuddle mobile app

Diving a little deeper...

http://rotoviz.com/2016/08/why-zero-rb-works-quantifying-injury-rates/

the article is geared to compare running backs with wide receivers for Fantasy Football purposes. However it also shows that between 2001 and 2004 the most likely injured positions were defensive back and linebacker.

It also, interestingly, asserts that age is not necessarily A determining Factor.

The article concludes saying that running backs are far more likely than wide receivers to be injured , especially if they are top-tier heavily used running backs.

That assertion combined with the data that we saw when Jonathan Stewart split carries with DeAngelo Williams suggest that our most effective approach would be to run a 2 back system.

Sent from my SM-G930P using CarolinaHuddle mobile app

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, LinvilleGorge said:

Soliai, Dickson, and Tolbert should be no brainer cuts. Stewart won't be cut unless we draft one of the elite RB prospects.

Even then, I'm not so sure. I actually hope we keep him another year. Just from my own eye test of really focusing on him, I think he's underrated. 

Aside from some injury concerns, he runs hard and gets tough yards, real tough yards. We get some better blocking and he's breaking a bunch of those this year, maybe not to the house but for big gains. Stiff arming defenders into the dirt along the way. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Give me Mitchell Evans over T Sanders in this run heavy offense any day of the week. 
    • What's up gents, the OGs remember me, the guy who single-handedly gave the Panthers the greatest uniform in history moniker. Not too long after that I got involved with Pro Football Focus (pre-Collinsworth acquisition) and ended up taking backseat here to preserve some objectivity. But from a distance I noticed a lot. After the end of the Cam era this place devolved into the most un-fun, petty, negative cesspool of whining and bitching that has ever graced the internet. The worst part of it all is that the level of discussion turned into the most ill-informed, hot-take, unnuanced crap, rife with people talking out of their posteriors as if they have any clue about what they are watching. Once you get into the professional side of the sport and actual film rooms, you start to understand there's an absurd number of moving parts to pretty much every snap and the details you are privy to are truly only half the picture. The absolute most important thing I learned from being part of professional level football analysis is that quarterbacking is literally the most intricate and difficult position in all of professional sports, and that the NFL itself is struggling to develop any workable model that allows them to understand what makes one succeed vs what makes one fail. Because of this paradox it has also made the quarterback position itself grossly overvalued from a fan and media standpoint, creating an absurd fixation on the results delivered by a single player who has to rely on the contributions of everyone around them. This also drives the dreaded inflation of QB salaries that inevitably cause even elite teams to lose key talent all to pour cash into the one player supposed to be able to single-handedly elevate the entire team (and defense and special teams and coaching and ownership by some mysterious proxy), yet without those same players even talented teams can wander the wilderness searching for the right guy to take advantage of their talent window. The discussions the last few years around Bryce has personified this insanity, as this board has devolved into some sort of electronic civil war between the hyperbolic Young supporters and the vitriolic Bryce haters. The reality, like practically everything in this world, is somewhere in the middle. He has traits that can absolutely elevate a team with creativity, play recognition, off-arm angle throws, mental toughness, etc. He's also physically limited, with mostly "good-enough" qualities for most situations that a professional quarterback is asked to do, and will never be an overpowering physical force like pre-injury Cam. But "good-enough" physicality represents a large majority of championship-winning quarterbacks, even in the modern era. There's a reason the corpse of Peyton Manning took the chip from elite physical specimen Cam, because the team surrounding him was talented enough to get him there, while we all know Cam was the driving force of that 2015 team. That's no knock on him, that's just how the game of football tends to work: the more complete team usually wins. The summary is this: if this team lives or dies solely on the performance of its quarterback, then it is absolutely a paper tiger even if he plays brilliantly week in and out. There are no superheroes in this sport, there are only conduits that proxy the collective efforts of much of the team around them. And no one alive can tell you how the position is played perfectly, it's all a confluence of circumstance and what unique collection of traits each player brings to the position, which can never be truly recreated season after season, even for the same player on the same team. If this place remains a raging hellscape of idiotic hot takes I will happily remove myself again and do something more productive for yet another decade, but maybe's there hope that we can all get back to the old adage, and keep pounding.
    • Really impressed how the bottom six have looked the past couple games
×
×
  • Create New...