Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

The Goodwill Donation. Anyone Know?


chknwing

Recommended Posts

I wish I did know, but I've seen Panthers paraphernalia (a shirt, jacket or ornaments here or there) in Goodwills all across the Triangle. My wife is unfortunately (or fortunately) an enthusiast and goes several times per week. 

One thing that I can tell you is that for some reason, they move items from store to store sometimes. Probably not furniture so much, but I've seen items that I've personally donated, seen on the floor of one store, only to see it at some other store.

On an off note, one time I saw a nice Panthers shirt that was in great shape. The initials "RR" were written on the tag in permanent marker, and it was size 3X. I said to myself "Nahhh...," but it really could have been Ron Rivera's.

So, basically, they spread their stuff around.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, h0llywood said:

I wonder why Goodwill of all places. That's a company, not a charity. 

Good luck to those who can snag these items though.

Just stop.

Goodwill is a 501(c)(3) charity. 

They are a nonprofit organization that provides job training, employment placement services, and other community-based programs for people who have barriers preventing them from otherwise obtaining a job (paraphrased form wikipedia) and one of my largest charitable tax deductions each year.

They use their thrift stores to help fund those activities.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

45 minutes ago, Inimicus said:

Just stop.

Goodwill is a 501(c)(3) charity. 

They are a nonprofit organization that provides job training, employment placement services, and other community-based programs for people who have barriers preventing them from otherwise obtaining a job (paraphrased form wikipedia) and one of my largest charitable tax deductions each year.

They use their thrift stores to help fund those activities.

They do some good things for the community, but they also grossly overpay their top executives, and underpay the rank and file (much like other companies). And, yes, I have researched this before, as there was a scandal.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, top dawg said:

They do some good things for the community, but they also grossly overpay their top executives, and underpay the rank and file (much like other companies). And, yes, I have researched this before, as there was a scandal.

The bottom line.

 

Every organization grossly overpays their executives and underpays the rank and file. Is it ok? No.  But does it undo the real and measurable good they do in the community? Also no.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

32 minutes ago, Inimicus said:

The bottom line.

 

Every organization grossly overpays their executives and underpays the rank and file. Is it ok? No.  But does it undo the real and measurable good they do in the community? Also no.

The salvation army top guy only gets paid 13k a year. The thing is most people are greedy and will take a bigger piece of the pie when they have control of a company. Goodwill's top guy pockets north of 2 million. Would you donate to a place that gives back 95% or 50%. It all depends on the charity too so I suggest you do research instead of lumping them all together. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, panthers1234 said:

The salvation army top guy only gets paid 13k a year. The thing is most people are greedy and will take a bigger piece of the pie when they have control of a company. Goodwill's top guy pockets north of 2 million. Would you donate to a place that gives back 95% or 50%. It all depends on the charity too so I suggest you do research instead of lumping them all together. 

Id never argue that there aren't organizations that do better with money management or that are better at delivering services.

 

But the post I was responding to was asserting that Goodwill wasn't a charitable organization.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Inimicus said:

Id never argue that there aren't organizations that do better with money management or that are better at delivering services.

 

But the post I was responding to was asserting that Goodwill wasn't a charitable organization.

Not trying to be a smartass, but that post was specifically in response to my post which didn't challenge Goodwill's status as a charity---and one that does some good works in the community---just that their top execs were making an exorbitant amount of money in my opinion, especially as compared to the employees in their stores. You acknowledged it with a decidedly apologetic response, but I decided to let it ride. @panthers1234 decided to call you on it.

Different charities have different goals---nothing wrong with that---but when a lot of people think of charities, they don't necessarily like the idea of execs becoming millionaires from charitable contributions. That's not their first thought. They believe a chunk of that money could/should be allotted to the community programs that you laud. That's the real bottom line. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Inimicus said:

Id never argue that there aren't organizations that do better with money management or that are better at delivering services.

 

But the post I was responding to was asserting that Goodwill wasn't a charitable organization.

It's a piece of poo. They exploit disabled workers and overpay executives.  It's a farce of a charity. 

 

There is no defending these actions.

http://www.nbcnews.com/news/investigations/more-disabled-workers-paid-just-pennies-hour-v19916979

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Why? AI already taking jobs, running up power bills, drinking all the water and just bad for the environment but hey lest try to shoehorn another useless way to use it.          
    • I'm going rogue in R1 but there's so much confusion around us. Last year, we were going Walker or Williams and caught folks off guard with TMac. The previous year we LOVED Legette and it was no surprise when his name was called. This year, I think we nail three areas that weren't totally addressed in FA.  R1 - Kayden McDonald Full disclosure, I want Thienemann here, but think he goes before 19. Some might see an "overdraft" but McDonald unlocks so many people on our D. Having a DT the caliber of McDonald let's Lloyd, Wallace and the newly drafted Hill flood the offensive backfield. Also opens up Moehrig and our EDGES to eat. Lastly, it also removes all the pressure on DB to be the primary facilitator in the trenches and A'Shawn will be missed. I don't care about Turk. McDonald is the only true DT worth of a R1 grade and Morgan seals up our trenches here w/ a kid from a blue blood school. R2 - Anthony Hill Jr *trade up*  I love JRod, but think a smart team takes him at the end of R1 (Seattle, NE w/ two d-minded coaches). Hill, Jr is a beast and lost in the shuffle with all the Styles/Allen/Rodriguez hype. He and Lloyd with DB and McDonald up front and flanked by Scourton/Phillips is nasty.  R3 - Hecht/Lew/Center du jour Let's stop the madness with ignoring this position in the draft. We need one and should start normalizing the capital invested in our OL with someone on a draft contract. He won't need to start day 1, but I think the right selection will push for starter reps. R4 - Bud Clark Not sure if he's here in R4 where we pick, but would fit the "type" of FS/roamer that we need opposite Moehrig and Ransom. Allows us to run 3-safety looks and really keep teams guessing with personnel packages. R5 - Kendrick Law The kind of WR we need. IDK if he's any different than Horn, Jr or Metchie but Law could be a dart throw that brings a deep threat to our WR corps I'm guessing one of the R5 picks is used to move up in R2 along with a '27 day 3 pick.   Post-draft, I sign Njoku to bring in a vet at TE. I'm also keeping my eyes open for pre-week 1 team cuts for a young CB that we could bring in to maybe plan for Mike Jack's departure next year. Flame away.... I know the McDonald pick will not make people happy.  
×
×
  • Create New...