Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Fowler article on Bradberry


ladypanther

Recommended Posts

Good write up....at this point in his career, seems like Bradberry is ahead of Norman...maybe due to attitude and coach-ability.

http://www.charlotteobserver.com/sports/spt-columns-blogs/scott-fowler/article126362609.html

Quote

 

Quote

I am not saying Bradberry is as good as Norman  -

But I think one day Bradberry could be.

Bradberry knows he’s not close to there yet, which is one reason I am betting on him. He was a first-day starter for Carolina as a rookie and he looked a little lost at the beginning.

“Initially, things were happening so fast,” Bradberry said. “And they hit a lot harder too in the NFL. But you get used to that.”

 

Quote

But the late-season results were generally very good for the workmanlike Bradberry, who was famously fixing a toilet at his house (under orders from his mother, a pastor) when the Panthers drafted him in the second round in April.


 
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, ladypanther said:

Good write up....at this point in his career, seems like Bradberry is ahead of Norman...maybe due to attitude and coach-ability.

http://www.charlotteobserver.com/sports/spt-columns-blogs/scott-fowler/article126362609.html

 

Bradberry has good insticts like Norman, but he was gifted with better talent.

-longer body frame

-Fast-Twitch Muscle

-faster short area & top end speed

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I love him


Yeah I was watching his Instagram live this one girl was trying to you know go down on him and she kept saying that she's willing to swallow and it was just very very uncomfortable he kept saying this is PG this is PG it was hilarious that everybody in the comments was just going absolutely bananas


Sent from my iPhone using CarolinaHuddle
Link to comment
Share on other sites

22 minutes ago, dardarroarroar said:


Yeah I was watching his Instagram live this one girl was trying to you know go down on him and she kept saying that she's willing to swallow and it was just very very uncomfortable he kept saying this is PG this is PG it was hilarious that everybody in the comments was just going absolutely bananas


Sent from my iPhone using CarolinaHuddle

Honestly could have gone without that, but okay.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Being ahead of Norman in development at this stage in his career isn't saying much. Norman stayed in Rivera's doghouse for the majority of his first three years or so in the league. Bradberry was also a 2nd round pick who we knew would be called upon to contribute early where Norman was a 5th round developmental type pick.

With that said, I'm thrilled with how well Bradberry played as a rookie. He looked really, really damn good.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, LinvilleGorge said:

With that said, I'm thrilled with how well Bradberry played as a rookie. He looked really, really damn good.

Matt Ryan, Julio Jones, Drew Brees, Brandin Cooks, Jameis Winston, and Mike Evans disagree with you, but I guess that does not matter.

1-5 in the division with the major reason they became the worst in the NFC South had everything to do with the secondary, and Bradberry does not get a pass for being a rookie. If he needed that pass, then he should have never started as a rookie.

When you can guarantee me that those 6 players will fear Bradberry, and Bradberry will dominate/change games with those match-ups, then get back to me. Until then the Panthers are in trouble when it comes to winning game in the NFC South.

That is what I want fixed now since SB contender is now a distant memory thanks to the 2016 off season. The current DB and DE situation will not fix that problem.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, CPantherKing said:

Matt Ryan, Julio Jones, Drew Brees, Brandin Cooks, Jameis Winston, and Mike Evans disagree with you, but I guess that does not matter.

1-5 in the division with the major reason they became the worst in the NFC South had everything to do with the secondary, and Bradberry does not get a pass for being a rookie. If he needed that pass, then he should have never started as a rookie.

When you can guarantee me that those 6 players will fear Bradberry, and Bradberry will dominate/change games with those match-ups, then get back to me. Until then the Panthers are in trouble when it comes to winning game in the NFC South.

That is what I want fixed now since SB contender is now a distant memory thanks to the 2016 off season. The current DB and DE situation will not fix that problem.

Bradberry makes up 20% of our secondary since we're in the nickel the majority of the time. He was our best CB all year long. He played well. Worley was the hottest trash imaginable early in the season, but played decently late. I still wouldn't be opposed to upgrading that spot this off season. But Bradberry? We got a player in that kid.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 minutes ago, LinvilleGorge said:

Bradberry makes up 20% of our secondary since we're in the nickel the majority of the time. He was our best CB all year long. He played well. Worley was the hottest trash imaginable early in the season, but played decently late. I still wouldn't be opposed to upgrading that spot this off season. But Bradberry? We got a player in that kid.

So, you would think about putting the Panthers future on Bradberry versus any of the match ups in the NFC South?

It is going to be a while for the Panthers to win again in the NFC South with Bradberry and Ealy anchoring the pass defense.

I like how you added a nickel CB to try to deflect the weight of the pass defense the #1 CB is suppose to carry for an NFL defense. The best CB on the team needs to be more than just 20% or less of the production from the secondary.

Your argument at best pushes for Bradberry to be the #2 CB with a solid at best contribution to the defense.

When it comes down to the 4th quarter and the Panthers needing to hold a lead to win a game, I do not have much faith in Bradberry changing the game or stopping a 1st down.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • In another post, Snow says about three years before you can properly grade a rookie class.  Sounds about right…
    • And this reiterates why I don’t want a Young contract extension. Please let us find another QB. 
    • Oh, the high expectations after a draft. Keep your expectations low, people. Darin Gantt's latest "Ask The Old Guy" gives life to one of those lessons about pro football reality as a fan: "Rasheed Walker was a three-year starter at left tackle for the Packers, so Freeling is going to have to work. Hunter's got another big 'un in front of him in Bobby Brown III and a different kind of defensive tackle in Tershawn Wharton. Chris Brazzell II's got a lot of traffic at his position. Zakee Wheatley has to be better than the chronically underappreciated Nick Scott, and Sam Hecht is a fifth-round rookie at the hardest position on the line to play, who probably doesn't have immediate positional flexibility, and a solid free agent addition in Luke Fortner in front of him. "Fans generally love their draft class as soon as it arrives, because there is no evidence to the contrary yet. Once guys get on the field, the reality begins to creep in, and the seasoned among you remember that if you get three or four good players out of a draft, that was an amazing draft." https://www.panthers.com/news/ask-the-old-guy-things-looking-up-after-the-draft-monroe-freeling-luke-kuechly-bryce-young-derrick-brown Don't get crazy. Winning the draft (or the offseason BTW) on paper always leads to good feelings and great expectations, especially when you seemingly succeeded the season before, but let's remember that the Panthers are very much a work in progress. Team building takes time. If we get a couple of starters out of the draft, it's a good draft, but three or four would be an amazing draft, and anything more than that is actually sensational--even if entails a few multiple high end rotational players along with three starters. Moreover, kind of within that same vein, the coaches have to let the kids off the chain. Remember the coach-speak of past coaches about competition that is anything but because coaches have their notions about veteran experience? Not saying that they're necessarily wrong, but sometimes I think their reluctance to put the young guys out there is based somewhat in dogma or possibly fear because big stakes are on the line (e.g., their jobs). It can be frustrating to say the least, but the coaches are supposed to know best. Again, I say all of this so that we can remember to temper expectations and keep them within the realm of reality. It's like telling your mind to think of it as something akin to under-promising and over-delivering. Leave room to be pleasantly surprised for the best case scenario, but be cognizant that that rarely happens. I would think at this point, most of us should be able to recognize growth when we see it, and sometimes that growth doesn't manifest itself in the form of immediate supremacy, but a setting of the stage for long term dominance for years to come. It seems like we're on track for an emergence by 2028 or 2029. We still have huge questions, but by 2029, hopefully we will take our seat at the table of the perennial contenders in the NFL.  
×
×
  • Create New...