Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Official Matty Meltdown Thread: Failcons VS Packers

Saca312

By Saca312,
in Carolina Panthers

Recommended Posts

Daddy_Uncle Veteran

Daddy_Uncle

Posted
Posted
3 hours ago, arbnranger said:

I'm taking a step back from my personal hatred for the Falcons as a fan. I enjoy the game a lot better if I just watch the gameplay with no personal bias. 

That having been said, Atlanta has been known to be soft for a few years now. Not this year. 

Atlanta jumps on top of Green Bay, exposes their injury isssues and the Packers come back to earth. Crowd is going to be rocking too.

Falcons- 28

GB- 24 

Get that poo outa here how bow dah

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Kakarot Newbie

Kakarot

Posted
Posted
2 hours ago, Peppers90 NC said:

Myth: Falcons defense is crappy.

Right. 

Their defense is good enough, and when you pair it with their juggernaut offense it equals a Super Bowl contender. They're going to beat the packers. Wouldn't be surprised if they blew them out.

41-24 Falcons

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Mojo Newbie

Mojo

Posted
Posted

GB is decimated in the secondary.  12 will have to play extraordinary (which he has) and little to no 3 and outs.  Falcons O is too good not to go ham on GB's D.   I would prefer GB and would love to see a Brady/Rodgers SB, however I think the Falcons pull this one out.  Could be wrong...Anyway I gotta call a spade a spade.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Randolph Panther Rising Star

Randolph Panther

Posted
Posted

Hard to count Aaron Rodgers out.  Have to think GB will need to force some turnovers, because it is simply hard to stop Atlanta.  

Have to admit Im kinda sad today, reflecting back on last year on championship Sunday.  Sports wise, probably the best day of my life driving to Charlotte and watching the game live.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Saca312 Experienced

Saca312

Posted
  • Author
Posted
4 minutes ago, Randolph Panther said:

Hard to count Aaron Rodgers out.  Have to think GB will need to force some turnovers, because it is simply hard to stop Atlanta.  

Have to admit Im kinda sad today, reflecting back on last year on championship Sunday.  Sports wise, probably the best day of my life driving to Charlotte and watching the game live.

I remember how beautiful last season's regular season game was and seeing it live.

I can still feel those "MVP" chants still reverberate through my body to this day.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
dardarroarroar Newbie

dardarroarroar

Posted
Posted
GB is decimated in the secondary.  12 will have to play extraordinary (which he has) and little to no 3 and outs.  Falcons O is too good not to go ham on GB's D.   I would prefer GB and would love to see a Brady/Rodgers SB, however I think the Falcons pull this one out.  Could be wrong...Anyway I gotta call a spade a spade.


I hope Matt Ryan throws an interception every time he throws the ball so I can at least have a laugh while I'm studying for English class


Sent from my iPhone using CarolinaHuddle
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Joe Bear
      Okay, now face the facta guyd

      By Joe Bear · Posted

      No, it will be a raw 6'7" 17-year-old European who just played basketball for the first time in March and who the idiot GM "had first on our board." He'll play the whole G-League season, get in 42 games for the Hornets and average 1.1 ppg on 35% shooting. Been there, seen that.
    • ForJimmy
      JJ Jansen on tanking

      By ForJimmy · Posted

      We missed on Burns at his peak value. That’s the problem with trading for picks 2-3 years away (which people were convinced the Rams would suck by now and these would be higher picks btw). Each year away the pick is the further in value it drops. Fitt was clearly hired based on turning us around quickly. It’s one of the many reasons tanking isn’t really a thing as our player JJ is telling you in this original article. It would take the whole organization from the owners down admitting they aren’t winning soon with Burns and picks 2-3 years away having more value because that’s when we are still rebuilding. It would only make sense if Fitt had a longer leash and would more than likely be the ones making these picks anyway which you wouldn’t want. The question is would you rather have those Rams picks with the strong possibility of Fitt still being here or would you rather Fitt try to “win now” like he did and expedite his firing? Altering the timeline would affect more than just the Rams picks. 
    • HaricotVert
      Potential changes to playoff seeding

      By HaricotVert · Posted

      I dont buy the idea that it would create more competitive games Given this: Seed Current Format Record Proposed Open Seeding Record 1 Lions 15–2 Lions 15–2 2 Eagles 14–3 Eagles 14–3 3 Buccaneers 10–7 Vikings 14–3 4 Rams 10–7 Commanders 12–5 5 Vikings 14–3 Rams 10–7 6 Commanders 12–5 Buccaneers 10–7 7 Packers 11–6 Packers 11–6 That would mean Wild Card round would have been Eagles (14/3) v  Pack(11/6) Vikings(14/3) v Bucs(10/7) Commanders(12/5) v Rams(10/7) Instead of Eagles (14/3) v  Pack(11/6) Bucs(10/7) v Commanders(12/5) Rams(10/7) v Vikings(14/3) Then with the reseed it would mean that highest remaining seed would always draw the lowest remaining team.
×
×
  • Create New...