Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Official Superbowl Thread: MY JINX WORKED!!!! BAHAHHAA FAILCONS AND MATTY MELTDOWN!!!!


Saca312

Recommended Posts

With the Superbowl less than 24 hours away, I thought I'd help begin discussions by doing the honors yet again of making the gameday thread a bit early. To make it up for you guys, I'll add in some of my extra thoughts as well.

Image result for matt ryan tom brady

With the Superbowl coming up in less than 24 hours, millions around the globe will witness the NFL's perpetual "best product" battle it out in Houston. The Falcons and Patriots have survived through the toils and struggles of the regular season, and coasted through the playoffs in dominating fashion. With their offenses flashing out greatness, and defenses just along for the ride, this Superbowl has been hyped up as a high scoring offensive affair.

The Falcons are looking for their first ever Superbowl win in Houston, and to ensure they won't be the last in the NFC South to achieve a Superbowl win. The Patriots are just looking to rub in Goddell's face with Brady's possible 5th ring - enough to cover one hand - and just piss off every fan in the nation with their dominance all these years.

Currently, the Patriots are the favorites to win, but no clear winner can officially be determined with how much uncertainty is involved with both teams. With many crying out the Falcons easy playoff schedule, the Patriots easy division, and defensive questions, there's not much evidence to fully support a team has a clear advantage over the other.

As always, Superbowls don't always go as expected; just take a look at last year when the Panthers got mauled when the Broncos exposed Remmers. The Panthers were the clear favorites, but that was made blatantly obvious that wouldn't happen. Cam Newton - Near unanimous league MVP - looked pedestrian as his RT flopped and turned against the sheer talent of Von Miller.

Also, league MVPs have terrible luck in the Superbowl. Last time a league MVP won a superbowl was Kurt Warner in 1999. That would make it around 17 years since the last MVP winner. This trend does not spell well for Matt Ryan, who was just named NFL MVP. This could prove to be a curse against the Falcons, but GameDay will tell the story.

So, this game theoretically is supposed to be a high scoring affair. 

Whoever scores the most should win.

This phrase applies literally in how the Patriots and Falcons have recently scored high scoring affairs. Their offenses has proven strong in the playoffs. Check out their records and scores this playoff season:

Falcons

  1. ATL vs SEA: 36 - 20; 16 point difference
    • Falcons proved themselves as having an offensive juggernaut in this game. Going against a Earl Thomas-less secondary, the Falcons easily ripped through and demolished their opponent
  2. ATL vs GB: 44-21; 23 point difference
    • Falcons proved themselves solid offensively by taking advantage of a ravaged, depleted, and horrid Green Bay defense. They looked near flawless, shutting down the Packers in the first half. Their defense is to be credited as well for doing their part and keeping their offense on the field, although certainly Green Bay took a bad time to look like garbage.
  • Total Point Difference: 39 points
  • Offensive Points Gained Average: 40 Points Gained Per Game
  • Defensive Points Allowed Average: 20.5 Points Allowed Per Game

Patriots

  1. NE vs HOU: 34-16; 18 point difference
    • The Patriots certainly had their mistakes, but that's to be expected against a Top 5 defense in the Texans. However, Tom Brady and Scheme soon proved unstoppable, as they feasted on an Osweiler led Texans team and gave them a beating they're sure to remember.
  2. NE vs PIT: 36-17; 19 point differnece
    • The Patriots dominated a Steelers team with a solid underrated defense. Their offense proved inept v.s. the #1 against the score Patriots defense, and the Patriots offense was too much for the Steelers defense
  • Total Point Difference: 37 points
  • Offensive Points Gained Average:  35 Points Gained Per Game
  • Defensive Points Allowed Average: 16.5 Points Allowed Per Game

Total Playoff Point Difference Falcons & PatriotsFalcons +2

Offensive Playoff Points Gained Average Falcons & Patriots: Falcons +5

Defensive Playoff Points Allowed Average Falcons & Patriots: Patriots -4

Before we proclaim one team far more superior than the other, let's add in offensive + defensive strength variables in this equation. I will resource the rankings provided by the NFL when determining strength of opponent for the postseason.

Here's the condensed list based on relevancy to opponents of teams in the superbowl + teams in Superbowl:

Total Defense Ranks:

   1.) Texans - Patriots Opponent (AFC Divisional)

   3.) Steelers - Patriots Opponent (AFC Championship)

   4.) Patriots - Superbowl Team

   4.) Seahawks - Falcons Opponent (NFC Divisional)

   6.) Falcons - Superbowl Team

   12.) Packers - Falcons Opponent (NFC Championship)

Total Offense Ranks:

   1.) Falcons - Superbowl Team

   3.) Patriots - Superbowl Team

   4.) Packers - Falcons Opponent (NFC Championship)

   5.) Steelers - Patriots Opponent (AFC Championship)

   7.) Seahawks - Falcons Opponent (AFC Championship)

   9.) Texans - Patriots Opponent (AFC Divisional)

I will be making a few basic equations when officially determining the final numbers. The following equations are used:

  • Offensive Playoffs Points Total: Let y = point penalty final outcome in equation y=x-0.5n, where n equals total defensive ranking of opponentsx = original offensive playoffs points total (superbowl team)
  • Defensive Playoffs Points Allowed Total: Let y = point penalty final outcome in equation y=x+0.5n, where n equals total offense ranking of opponentsx = original defeensive playoffs points allowed total (superbowl team).

So, using such equations, here's what we get:

Falcons

Offensive Playoffs Points Total

y=x-0.5n

y=(40)-0.5(12[GB]+4[SEA])

y=32

Defensive Playoffs Points Total

y=x+0.5n

y=(20.5)+0.5(4[GB]+7[SEA])

y=26;

Falcons Playoff SoS Offensive Playoffs Points Total: 32; -8 point penalty

Falcons Playoff SoS Defensive Playoffs Points Allowed Total: 26; +5.5 penalty

Patriots

Offensive Playoffs Points Total

y=x-0.5n

y=(35)-0.5(1[HOU]+3[PIT])

y=33

Defensive Playoffs Points Total

y=x+0.5n

y=(15.5)+0.5(5[PIT]+9[HOU])

y=22.5

Patriots Playoff SoS Offensive Playoffs Points Total: 32; -2 penalty

Patriots Playoff SoS Defensive Playoffs Points Allowed Total: 22.5; +7 penalty

So, take a look at this:

  • Offensive Playoff Points Gained SoS Average Falcons & Patriots: Falcons & Patriots ±0
  • Defensive Playoff Points Allowed SoS Average Falcons & Patriots: Patriots -3.5
  • Total Advantage: Patriots (+3.5; based on absolute value of above values)

Sure, I'm not a statistics/data person, but I have taken Algebra in grade school. Using basic formulas based upon rankings and such, I've determined the Patriots have had more success in the playoffs when considering the strength of schedule for these two teams.

Some interesting findings:

  • Even though the Patriots faced easier opponents, they still have an advantage over the Falcons defensively.
  • The Falcons and Patriots offenses are equal in strength through the playoffs. 

So, theoretically the Patriots have a better team in the postseason, while the Falcons have an inferior team. This could play a role.

Prediction:

The Flying Falcons are too good. They're good. I was wrong earlier when I posted gameday threads in the postseason when I said Matty Meltdowns suxs. He doesn't. I regret that statement and will ignore my stat crunching above and say Falcons dominate and wreck 10000000000-0 against the Cheatriots becuz they sux and cheat all the time. Julio Jones is too good and Matt Ryan is MVP they're sooooo good. Lol at my old playoff threads saying they sux boy was I wrong.

*Note: No, I'm not trying to jinx the Falcons, I would never do that. Like what reason should I jinx them for? I only jinxed them before because I was a salty Panthers fan. Now I respect the incredible league MVP Matty Ice. 

Image result for matt ryan dancing

#riseup

Discuss the actual game, commentary, and commodities below:

EDIT: BABHAHAAHHAHAHAHA

JINXED SUCKAS!!!!!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't think you guys realize how overrated this NE defense is.  Atlanta ran 27 plays from scrimmage in a row in the NFCCG that were literally completely different.  Imagine what else they have left?  

 

Atlanta about to lift that Lombardi up, and they will hold it over our heads just as the Saints and Bucs do.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, Camvp said:

I don't think you guys realize how overrated this NE defense is.  Atlanta ran 27 plays from scrimmage in a row in the NFCCG that were literally completely different.  Imagine what else they have left?  

Stats show otherwise when taking strength of playoff schedule into account with the Patriots having the clear advantage.

Belicheck is a mastermind as well with scheme. He's always got goodies in the Superbowl.

But nevertheless the Falcons are good I mean did u see Julio and Ryan against us before in the first game they're invincible and Matt Ryan is MVP they the best they gonna win.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • In before: "XL sucks, there is no hope." "As long as we have Bryce, none of this matters." My response: "It's X, not XL...we're not discussing apparel sizes, or we'd have to consider XS."  
    • Alain Pierre provides some food for thought on Last Word On Sports regarding Xavier Legette, and his article, though specifically on X, kind of puts me in the mind of QBs being overdrafted and put into situations that they're not prepared for, some ultimately failing due to drafting missteps by front offices who don't necessarily view prospective players within the contextual importance that situations demand.  At this point, Legette looks like a failure in reference to expectations, of not only what a consistently productive NFL receiver looks like, but a first round pick (which he obviously should never have been). But the story on X isn't necessarily completely over. Damn. I seem to be experiencing deja vu...It wasn't X's fault that he was overdrafted, that was a choice by an FO that obviously downplayed actual realized skill vs outstanding measurables and upside. Sure, the FO was impressed by X's one-year feats during his senior season at South Carolina, but it was the NFL god, RAS (a.k.a. Raw Athletic Score), that had Dave Canales's and Dan Morgan's jaws dropping in amazement at the sight of X running around in underwear at the Combine...   "At 6-foot-3 and over 220 pounds, Legette brought rare athletic upside to the position. His breakout season at South Carolina showed flashes of dominance that NFL teams dream of. Projecting forward, many scouts compared his physical profile to D.K. Metcalf, and the Panthers clearly believed they could develop him into a true wide receiver 1 over time. The issue was never his talent. The issue was the timeline. Just a few picks later, the Chargers selected Ladd McConkey, a receiver who may have lacked Xavier Legette’s physical ceiling but entered the league far more technically refined. McConkey immediately showed advanced route discipline, leverage awareness, good pacing, and separation ability.  Bryce Young’s game has always depended on timing and anticipation. His best football at Alabama came with receivers capable of winning through precision rather than pure athleticism. Jameson Williams and John Metchie III were excellent route runners and were able to get drafted in 2022. McConkey naturally fit that style of play. Legette, meanwhile, needed significant development in the exact areas where Bryce Young needed help. The Panthers drafted traits when Bryce Young needed reliability."   Yes, the FO was guilty. The good thing is that the execs appear to be improving. Some of that may be attributed to the hiring of Eric Eager (who was hired right after the Xavier Legette draft). Eager seems to have helped the Panthers FO fine-tune their analytical progress, and, at least on paper, they acquired players with a lot of value during the last draft in regards to actually (what I'll refer to as) "underdrafting" talent relative to their position with value already built in.  Look at Chris Brazzell: He may be more of the quintessential project receiver who was arguably more or less just as raw as Legette was when he was drafted, and with a relatively high RAS as well. The notable difference is value, as Brazzell was a round three pick and Legette was a first rounder.    "Unlike the Xavier Legette situation, Carolina’s environment for Brazzell is completely different. "The Panthers are not asking a raw receiver prospect to stabilize this offense for Bryce Young. "Brazzell enters a much healthier developmental situation with far less pressure. With Tetairoa McMillan established as the primary target and Jalen Coker continuing to settle as the number 2 option...Xavier Legette, Metchie III, and Jimmy Horn Jr. are also still in this rotation, fighting for reps. "It gives Carolina something they failed to give Legette when they drafted him: A developmental runway. "Xavier Legette entered the league with expectations attached to a first-round pick and an offense desperate for answers. Brazzell enters a room where he can spend a year working on his route running, learning the playbook, and earning snaps gradually rather than being asked to become part of Bryce Young’s solution immediately. "And truthfully, Brazzell needs that time coming out of college. Despite his elite physical tools, many evaluators have several concerns about his overall polish as a receiver. "His route tree at Tennessee was viewed as fairly limited due to the type of offense that they run. The receivers are expected to run a lot of choice routes, which are dictated by the placement of the defenders. It doesn’t require technical route-running and an understanding of the playbook needed at the NFL level...   "Context changes significantly when expectations change. "The Panthers are not depending on Brazzell to save the offense. They can allow him to develop slowly, expand his route tree, improve his technical refinement, and learn behind a much more stable receiver room... "Traits become much easier to bet on when patience is built into the plan."   It's all about understanding your situation. I don't agree that it's an inherently difficult choice like the author is suggesting in the following excerpt. At the very least, I think that it should be easier as long as all parties involved stay levelheaded and true to their process.    "That is what makes these draft decisions so difficult. "Every front office believes it can find the next Metcalf, Owens, or Marshall. Sometimes they do. More often, they are betting on a development path that may take years to complete. "The challenge is understanding what your offense needs right now. "If a team has patience, stability, and a quarterback capable of carrying the offense while a receiver develops, betting on traits can make sense. But if a young quarterback needs immediate help, there is a strong argument for prioritizing the receiver who already knows how to separate, create throwing , and earn trust from day one. "That’s why the Xavier Legette-Ladd McConkey debate remains so fascinating. "It was never really a discussion about talent. It was a discussion about timing."   For me, Ladd McConkey was talented enough in his own right, that the gap--the upside--was never as big as people are suggesting between not only McConkey and Legette, but McConkey and other receivers drafted in the first round during that draft. The technique divide between Ladd and X was pretty stark though, as was the roughly 35 pounds, but the speed was identical, the maybe 1½ height difference isn't huge (6' and 6'1"), and it may surprise some that Ladd's RAS (9.34) was also enough to put him in the top 10 percent of receivers since 1987. There is an argument that he would've been a better pick for Bryce and the Panthers, regardless of timeline and talent. But, I still appreciate the thesis (if you will) of the article, as it still provides some hope--perhaps a glimmer at this point, that X's RAS may finally translate to the NFL given more time, but, perhaps more importantly, it explains how Dan Morgan and company are showing improvement, even if it appears somewhat understated. My hope is that continued improvement is palpable by this time next year. https://lastwordonsports.com/nfl/2026/05/30/xavier-legette-draft-lessons/#google_vignette        
    • Won’t stop until people stop buying overpriced poo.
×
×
  • Create New...