Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

"Growing sense" Chiefs moving on from Alex Smith


Nails

Recommended Posts

4 minutes ago, Davidson Deac II said:

Sure they could.  Just have to build a fantastic defense, as Denver did last year.  When they won it with a qb who could barely throw the ball more than 10-15 yards.

That is a terrible old cliche, did anyone see how awful Peyton Manning was in BOTH the Superbowls??? Even the entire playoffs he was beyond terrible. Still won. Trent dilfer rode a great D to a win too, few other name-less QBs got there and some won.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, Davidson Deac II said:

Sure they could.  Just have to build a fantastic defense, as Denver did last year.  When they won it with a qb who could barely throw the ball more than 10-15 yards.

Defense lead not Alex Smith. Plus those teams that win with mediocre QB plays are anomalies. And Peyton actually made some crucial throws in the playoffs, throws that Alex Smith is scared of attempting.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This moving would confusing becuz smiths contract is favorable for them to try and retain Berry. By releasing Smith my immediate thought is to free up cap for Berry. But then either Romo or Jimmy G would have a higher price tag than Smiths current. Interesting. 

Whst if they release Smith save cap and traded Berry after tagging him for a QB

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, CarolinaSock said:

Can we really be making fun of other teams QB's when we had the 28th ranked QB with the lowest completion % in the league and it wasn't even close (3.7% from 2nd worst for qualified qbs).

yeah we can because cam is a better quarterback than alex smith, full stop

do you think the chiefs would take cam newton right now?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The only reason I could think they would float a rumor of cutting Smith was if they were already in trade talks with someone and wanted to worry that team about him getting onto the free market. Smith would go fast and fairly expensive out there.

You think Fox in Chicago wouldn't rather have Smith than Cutler the Coach Killer?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Some of you act like one can't learn from experience over time. Just because you may not know what you're doing in 2018 doesn't mean that you don't know what you're doing in 2025. Frankly, you grow from experience, and success and excellence gives first-time applicants the hand probably 99.999% of the time.
    • It's an interesting topic of conversation as sports evolves. I think ultimately it would lead to a number of small market franchises folding though. Especially in the NBA where there are so many bad teams that have been bad for years and years in some cases already. But as it stands I think athlete pay draft or no draft aside has reached a point where we can and should realistically ask should they make that much compared to the average person. Now college athletes is a different conversation but even that reaches a breaking point. But we could go down the rabbit hole on this even further into overall entertainment and talk about actors making absurd sums too. In the end I think in sports the powers that be won't allow these changes to even be considered because it opens the door for so many other variables. But who knows how long sports like football will realistically be around after people like us pass on. We're only just now learning about things like CTE which the league and the sport in general will only be able to run away from for so long. As far as the NBA goes my understanding is viewership has been steadily going down for a number of reasons but one crucial aspect is key players missing so many games. The NBA has to figure that out regardless. Especially when considering fans who pay to see these athletes compete in person. But hey I guess let's just try to appreciate what we've got while it still exists in this form eh?
    • I can't see a world where the money goes down, but maybe your lottery odds are now your contract numbers you can offer.  Thunder? You can offer Flagg 4 years, 20 million.  Hornets? You can offer Flagg 4 years, 80 million.  Some form of a system where the money is still there, but so is the freedom of choice (on top of bad teams getting *some* competitive advantage to signing them). 
×
×
  • Create New...