Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

The Jaguars have filled all their needs except...


Verge

Recommended Posts

Bad news for those wanting to draft Fournette, the possible picks for the Jaguars came down to Adams (church), pass rusher (Campbell), Lattimore (Bouye), Hooker,and Fournette.

 

I know a lot of us were hoping to nab him, so this would suck, but unless they get cheeky with d-line, target ANOTHER db, or reeaaallly early OL, we are out of luck. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yea , I'm in the wait and see on the Draft , I hope 1 of the 2  Fournette or Adams  are still on the board at #8 , But you never know who will be on the board when our pick comes up.

Now its Time to fill  My breakfast needs  hahah  7 eggs  mixed with 1/2 cup of oats and ham  , side cup of black beans and 2 16oz bottle of water  YUMMY YUMMY

 

Mock Draft Report 5.0: Post-Combine

170308_mock_inside.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

They released Sen'Derrick Marks, DT yesterday, and Campbell is 30 years old.  Ivory (2021), and Yeldon are under contract for multiple years.  Nothing cheeky about it, their DL still sucks.  Allen or Thomas are still the LIKELY pick(s).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, NcPsa10 said:

Yea , I'm in the wait and see on the Draft , I hope 1 of the 2  Fournette or Adams  are still on the board at #8 , But you never know who will be on the board when our pick comes up.

Now its Time to fill  My breakfast needs  hahah  7 eggs  mixed with 1/2 cup of oats and ham  , side cup of black beans and 2 16oz bottle of water  YUMMY YUMMY

The chances Fournette or Adams are on the board is H I G H.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Steves89 said:

Doesn't this make the likelihood of a safety being on the board higher? Adams is the number one person on my board (well, after myles) and Hooker, though not my favorite wouldn't be bad at 8 either.

Maybe Hooker but I doubt it.  Not Adams with Church.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Verge said:

Bad news for those wanting to draft Fournette, the possible picks for the Jaguars came down to Adams (church), pass rusher (Campbell), Lattimore (Bouye), Hooker,and Fournette.

 

I know a lot of us were hoping to nab him, so this would suck, but unless they get cheeky with d-line, target ANOTHER db, or reeaaallly early OL, we are out of luck. 

Maybe. There is an argument that they don't need a RB. But, with Coughlin running the place, I am sure Fournette is a big bleep on the radar.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

26 minutes ago, top dawg said:

Maybe. There is an argument that they don't need a RB. But, with Coughlin running the place, I am sure Fournette is a big bleep on the radar.

So are Allen/Thomas.  Just sucks we have to wait.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't know everything about Jacksonville at all.  It really depends on how they view certain players, and how they fit into their plans.

Fournette needs a power running team, which it looks like Jacksonville has.  Do they feel like he's a better player over what they have?  Do they have a bigger hole on their roster?  Jacksonville has been the team of potential, tons of high draft picks, and chronic under achievement. Why is that?

Who knows who they will pick, or who will trade up.  We know that this draft is already getting crazy with the rest of the trades going on.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Great point.    I would lke to add that there is another QB on the roster who was terrible over the middle--Kenny Pickett.  
    • I don't think this is the year for Carolina, unfortunately.  I think they will have to make a decision on the QB position-all we know is that Bryce has year 5, but a long term deal has not been signed--yet--and they would be smart to take a "wait and see" approach.  I have not kept up, and I see a path to upside for Bryce, but I do not think we have aggressively pursued a QB when our QB was mediocre to worse than mediocre.  yes, his numbers are improving--but he has adapted by eliminating what he does poorly and not improving on what he does poorly.  Just my take and I have no data to support this view.   Basically, we go as Bryce goes, so the approach is not to bring in a QB to have him compete until we find one, but it is to make Bryce as good as he can be--is that good enough? Season ticket holders buy the hope of winning rings, not winning 8 games. Last year, Bryce had a resurgence.  Take away TMac and Rico Dowdle.  How good was he?  I still have hope.  Not a hater of plan A, but a hater because we have no plan B.
    • Yeah man, I've been here for a very very long time. Couldn't even begin to tell you what year. Maybe 2004 or 5? I've never really been super active, just enjoy reading everyone's opinions and discussions. I'll chime in from time to time. I have had a few different accounts over the years. It's always been a fun place for me to check in on my favorite team. Hopefully we can keep the place running for a long while still. I also would like to recommend bringing back the Lovely Ladies page!
×
×
  • Create New...