Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

IMHO!!


WOW!!

Recommended Posts

From what I'm seeing in the moves that have been made .. Here are a few opinions on future transactions...

1. Gman has conceeded that Fournette, Thomas and the 2 safeties are not going to be on the board at 8.. So he might be trading back to 11 - 15 to get either Ross, Howard or Barnett and a extra pick in the 2nd or 3rd round.. The Browns pick at 12 could be the target .. The Browns move up to get one of the young QB's or use the 8th pick to get Grapapplo from the Pat's.. While still getting Garrett at 1. ..

2. I see a combo of Safety and DE in the 1st 3 picks and a 3rd round RB... He brought these older guys in to easy the transition of younger players in a year ir 2..

3. Only RB he likes in the 1st is Fournette.. After that the only RB's i see he might be into are 3rd and 4th round avilable players..

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, E CaT PanTHer 2 said:

or I can see DG moving up to #5 to get either Fournette or Adams. 

He isn't moving up when he has said to many times "this draft is deep" and "you're never 1 player away".. He isn't going to trade away a chance to get atleast 4 future starters for 1..

He can walk out of this draft with a stater at WR and future starters at DE, TE, S, and RB..

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Some of you might want to get use to him not valuing RB's like you do...

Gman might be in the '"really not liking to spend a 1st round pick on a devalued position like RB" club.. He is all about value and he has that NY Giants philosphy .. They never draft 1st round RB's..

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, WOW!! said:

Some of you might want to get use to him not valuing RB's like you do...

Gman might be in the '"really not liking to spend a 1st round pick on a devalued position like RB" club.. He is all about value and he has that NY Giants philosphy .. They never draft 1st round RB's..

Never say never...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, rodeo said:

Far more likely we package that pick we just got from NE to move up than it is we move down.

Source: Gettleman has never moved down, but moved up every draft.

I disagree.. He is looking to get his future DE, Safety and Weapon on offense in this draft.. You don't trade picks to get less picks in a draft you think is deep..

The other times he traded up the drafts weren't as deep and he didn't have so many picks in the top 100 before. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Cam's game is entirely dependent on the RB being a threat so that they can't key on Cam as a runner OR a passer on every down. Stew is unreliable due to health and a struggling OL at times.

A talented RB that we can rely on for the next 5-8 years is just what we need and I think Gman knows that if he knows anything about the build of this team.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Trade back with Cleveland and get Barnett

Use the NE second rounder and Cleveland's second to move up and get Ross in the first

Use our second rounder to get Obi

Use the 3rd round comp pick to get the Iowa TE

Use the 4th rounder to get Perine

Use the 5th on a developmental LT like Davenport

Use the sixth and seventh for whatever.

Celebrate

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, XClown1986 said:

Maybe we set up a package of picks to go to 1 and get Myles Garrett

Really??

1st i don't think we have a package good enough to convince Cleveland not to take Garrett..

2nd We aren't one player away..

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I would very much liked to have seen Jake Delhomme's career if Tommy Jone no hurt Jake.  I just know that roster and the leadership were destined to hit paydirt but Jake was never the same after the elbow injury, and unfortunately he was the sole reason they didn't make it back to the big one.  I think that 08 team was the best in the league, and Jake masked his inability well all season til the Arizona game put it all on display.  I'll go back to the season prior even and say the 07 team was primed to be a competitor.  Jake was off to a fantastic start that year (for a Panthers QB).  They may have been a championship caliber club for a few seasons after 08 too.
    • "In fact, they’ve worn silver pants just six times since 2023. Compare it to the number of times they’ve worn black (20), white (15) or process blue (11) pants in those same seasons and you start to wonder how long it’ll be before they promote their black alternate helmets to primary status and phase out silver entirely" Basically this - just eliminate silver from the colour scheme. Maybe experiment with white matte helmets as an alternate to the black ones too.
    • Ideally every player would win the job in a fair competition. Beat out the guy in front of you. If you can.     If XL is in front of a draft pick, the draft pick needs to beat him out. Whoever is in front of him.  Should be the way of the world.     Aside from that if they do want to trade XL they should give him a chance to rehabilitate his rep and up his value. Showcase.   But then if he proves he is worth something you want to trade him away?  I do  no t think we would save all his guaranteed money, for one.  Not sure though.     And finally, today I posted about Bryce throwing it away on 4th down.   It got me thinking of the mental stuff with XL. What Bryce did was just about as bad as XL’s mental lapses in terms of being ignorant.   I bet there are some Bryce supporting XL haters here, that one is for you.   
×
×
  • Create New...