Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Saints will host Joe Mixon, hold 32nd pick in the Draft. Most GMs think he's a second rounder now.

nctarheel0619

By nctarheel0619,
in Carolina Panthers

Recommended Posts

nctarheel0619 Newbie

nctarheel0619

Posted
  • Author
Posted
Just now, saints4lifeagain said:

I'm honestly somewhat surprised by the coninued interest (they met with him at his proday as well). Seems like they've spent the last couple years cleaning out the locker room. Dealing with only high character guys. Not saying Mixon isn't,  and I'm sure that's what these meetings are about, he just comes with a lot of baggage, which is something they've tried to steer away from. 

As far as him as a player, I think he fits well. Obviously, it's hard to know what these guys will do in the NFL, but strictly talent wise, I think he's a better prospect than Ingram, but like @stbugs has said, Ingram has been vastly underrated since his underutilized rookie year. Does it make the Saints better? Possibly. 

Good, hopefully they think like you and stbugs and don't take him.  Keep him out of the NFC South.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites
t96 Grand Master

t96

Posted
Posted

Hope they take him at 32 and he proceeds to fug up again and is out of the league within a couple years. Both because fug the Aints and so I don't have to listen to poo here on days 2 and 3 about him.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
saints4lifeagain Rookie

saints4lifeagain

Posted
Posted
11 minutes ago, nctarheel0619 said:

Good, hopefully they think like you and stbugs and don't take him.  Keep him out of the NFC South.  

I'm certainly not saying I wouldn't take him. I think it depends on how the board falls, and how you have him graded. With no character concerns, he's probably the 2nd best back in the draft. Some may even have him ahead of Fournette, although I wouldn't. 

I wouldn't necessarily be surprised with him being the pick at 32. I don't think he will be, but could certainly see him at 42 or one of the 3rd rounders, although I doubt he falls that far.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
tiger7_88 Experienced

tiger7_88

Posted
Posted
59 minutes ago, nctarheel0619 said:

He's that dynamic.  Dude would be a stud on the Saints.  You don't think he's the most talented?  LOLZ.  Your hate is blinding you.  Per usual here on the Huddle.  

Tissue re-supply for nctarheel0619, stat.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
saints4lifeagain Rookie

saints4lifeagain

Posted
Posted
22 minutes ago, stbugs said:

Glad someone got my point. Ingram's been really solid the past two years. Few RBs do better than 4.9ypc on almost 400 carries and also catch almost 100 balls in two years as a non-solely 3rd down RB.

Agreed. I tend do think he benefits from playing in the Saints offense a bit, but he's really improved over the years. His vision and patience has really gotten better. The switch to a zone blocking scheme really helped him.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
WOW!! Grand Master

WOW!!

Posted
Posted
1 hour ago, nctarheel0619 said:

I'm born and raised in North Carolina.  Why the fug would I root for the Saints?  I'm not some guy that enjoys penis, thinks Frozen is the best movie ever, and is from California and jumped on the Panthers bandwagon.  

Just ignore Bwood he adds nothing to any conversation and tries to act gangster behind a computer screen.. When reality is he's a cosplay dude who plays female chacracters exclusivly.. (guessing about the female part)..

Link to comment
Share on other sites
WOW!! Grand Master

WOW!!

Posted
Posted
1 hour ago, sanjay_rajput said:

Not with the upgraded secondary , our LBs will be able to roam more free and DL will be able to control the inside runs.

No he is not the most talented back in the draft that my friend is Leonard Fournette whose catching ability is underrated

Joe Mixon is #2 or 3 back but I rather take McCaffrey for the Panthers scheme.

1. Fournette

2. McCaffrey

3. Mixon

Disagree about McCaffrey.. But Fournette and Mixon can battle for top spot skills mixed with size, and weight style..

Link to comment
Share on other sites
WOW!! Grand Master

WOW!!

Posted
Posted
3 minutes ago, Bogart said:

fug the Saints and fug this Mixon apologist who started another Mixon thread.  

Nahhh fug yourself for clicking on a thread that had Mixon in the title if you didn't care for the conversation..

Blame your dumbass self not the OP..

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • LinvilleGorge
      Tight End: The Need is Bigger than We Think

      By LinvilleGorge · Posted

      Build the best roster we can and if Bryce continues to be a weak link continue building that roster by replacing him. Bringing Pickett was a real disappointment. Felt like we gave him $7.5M just so that we could pretend he's a quality backup. Well, he must be since we're paying him like one.
    • frankw
      BREAKING!!! Panthers signing Packers LT Rasheed Walker

      By frankw · Posted

      Well if we are being realistic doesn't what you just lined out already tell us where we are at? If the rookie UDFA kicker was the savior more often than not and we had a bottom 5 offense despite us having a #1 pick behind center who was billed predraft as a mini Payton Manning is that just going to magically change trajectory overnight with a tougher schedule added in? If we are going to repeat as division champions then it will be with the defense doing the heavy lifting. So keep adding to it.
    • BEASTfromdaEAST
      At this point its Sadiq or bust... A

      By BEASTfromdaEAST · Posted

      Everyone keeps arguing all these teams have great TE's that made them successful. THATS BS! What makes those teams great is QB play and we don't have that. So again even getting a NON-INLINE TE who can run a fast 40 time isnt going to get us anywhere without competent QB play consistently. Which we don't have by a long shot. So honestly all these great teams have a TE argument doesnt hold water to me.  Mahomes would be nasty without Kelce, Lamar would blow you away without Andrews, does it help? of course any weapon will help but only if you have someone making those correct reads week to week. When we have that then I'd be all in on a game breaking TE but unfortunately we are stuck with one of the most inconsistent starting QB's currently in the NFL.  Not to mention all the TE's mentioned are COMPLETE TE's not just a receiving threat with drop issues which Sadiq does. Argue all you want but nothing will change that fact other than getting a consistent QB week to week in a Panthers uniform which doesnt seem to be happing anytime soon.
×
×
  • Create New...