Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

PFF explains how versatile we really can be now with CMC and Samuel


Recommended Posts

Yeah... 88 on the left vs a safety, KB, Funch and Samuel on the right taking all the corners up and CMC coming out of the backfield against a LB is pretty intriguing.  Cam should have about 10 different options available with that assuming the O line gives him time.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Darth Biscuit said:

assuming the O line gives him time.

 

You hit the nail on the head.....the issue with the offense last year was OL, and the offense can be ridiculous this year IF the OL can get it done.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, Darth Biscuit said:

Yeah... 88 on the left vs a safety, KB, Funch and Samuel on the right taking all the corners up and CMC coming out of the backfield against a LB is pretty intriguing.  Cam should have about 10 different options available with that assuming the O line gives him time.

 

I think the biggest factor will be who will be the first and second read in the offensive plays. Usually it was KB / Olsen as the first and second read. We didn't have time for a 3rd or 4th read last year. 

For us to be truly effective especially early in the season I think CMC must be 1st or 2nd read in the offense. This will make defenses focus more on him and will open the offense up for Olsen, KB, Samuels/Funch. 

Last year it seemed like KB was the first read and couldn't get separation so the next guy was Olsen. KB recovering from ACL made it easy for defenses to cover our first read. Zone defenses were particularly effective against us because it takes big guys longer to get into the holes in zone defenses.

Having 2 speedy guys (Samuels/CMC) will create issues for defenses to use zone or we can dink and dunk our way down the field. Using man to man will create issues bc CMC against a linebacker is a mismatch. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, MadHatter said:

You hit the nail on the head.....the issue with the offense last year was OL, and the offense can be ridiculous this year IF the OL can get it done.

 

The whole point of brining in these playmakers is to make it easier on the O-line by getting the ball out of Cam's hands a little quicker though. Cam is going to have to learn to dink and dunk a little bit more.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Hogmolliesmaht said:

The whole point of brining in these playmakers is to make it easier on the O-line by getting the ball out of Cam's hands a little quicker though. Cam is going to have to learn to dink and dunk a little bit more.

It definitely goes both ways...  having quick playmakers makes the Defense concerned about quick passes... the O line giving Cam time to find guys down field puts pressure on their D backs... doing both keeps defenses confused.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

54 minutes ago, MadHatter said:

You hit the nail on the head.....the issue with the offense last year was OL, and the offense can be ridiculous this year IF the OL can get it done.

 

Well the Oline should be helped out a bit...with a better short passing game.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, TheMaulClaw said:

Well the Oline should be helped out a bit...with a better short passing game.

This is true, and in turn defenses will have to commit more defenders to cover the shallower routes implemented which also limits the available blitzers for defenses to let loose regularly. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 hours ago, TheMaulClaw said:

Well the Oline should be helped out a bit...with a better short passing game.

Shula drove me insane with this last year. 

The OL is complete poo yet we design and call plays that take a long time to develop. 

If the OL is complete poo you got to design and call plays that have the ball out in 2-3 seconds. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, PrimeTimeHeel said:

Shula drove me insane with this last year. 

The OL is complete poo yet we design and call plays that take a long time to develop. 

If the OL is complete poo you got to design and call plays that have the ball out in 2-3 seconds. 

If Shula can't do common sense things, why people question those that are skeptical of what he can do with CMC and Samuel?

Truthfully the problem with Shula is he doesn't know how to adjust. Whatever he has planned, he's going to stick with until the season is over. If we get exposed, the adjustments will be minimal. We need to go to a faster paced offense and let Cam adjust to what he see.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

21 minutes ago, PrimeTimeHeel said:

Shula drove me insane with this last year. 

The OL is complete poo yet we design and call plays that take a long time to develop. 

If the OL is complete poo you got to design and call plays that have the ball out in 2-3 seconds. 

What players did we have last year that we could get the ball out out in 2-3 seconds, without the opposing team being draped all over that receiver? ginn? With those hands? We were a SLOW team, our receivers were literally the worst in the league about getting separation. We just got quick and fast af with our two first picks. This theoretically should work.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • For starters, and again I am not sure what his capacity is in the media or how connected he is to the team, but I posted above Al Wallace says he is "absolutely" getting 50+ a year and he deserves it.  I obviously strongly disagree with it but it feels like like season when the team is slow leaking info to gauge the temp.   Secondly nobody on Gods green earth is going to sign an extension making less than he is making now.  Thats just crazy talk.  
    • No. Physical tools alone aren't enough. There are plenty of examples of draft busts to support that. Aost all of them had the physical tools and that wasn't enough. But Bryce is a perfect example of the opposite. Absolutely elite intangibles aren't enough either. If you simply don't have the physical abilities all the football intelligence and work ethic in the world won't be enough to overcome it. Just look to the sidelines every Sunday. We call those people "coaches".
    • As much as I despise Billy B, his philosophy on QBs is how I would approach things if I were a GM. You always keep looking for your next starter.  He has Bledsoe, who got injured and his backup ended up being the GOAT. Even while he had that going, he kept getting his next guy and developing them. When Brady got hurt, Cassel stepped in and went 11-5 and they missed the wild card by dumb luck. Who knows how far they would have gone if they had gotten in. Jimmy Gs career started in NE. There were others, but he always kept looking.  You can't be afraid to keep looking for your next starter, but it looks like we're afraid to look for more than a marginal one. If you're going to offer a $25m contract with incentives, that screams marginal QB. It also screams you're just a transition until we find our guy. After a 10 or 11 win season, he's not accepting that offer. And then you're in a Daniel Jones situation. Do you pay for a year of success and pray it wasn't a one year wonder?  To this point, Bryce has really produced nothing, yet for whatever reason, our FO has not even sniffed at the idea that we need a real QB room with real QBs. Dalton was never starter potential, Plummer was a joke. KP certainly isn't, neither is Grier.  Our approach to the QB room needs to be one of strength not fear. Bring in guys who can compete or who you think can compete. This is THE elite position, in an elite sport, paid premium salary, where production matters. Either you produce or you can lose your job. It's not mean, it's just the reality of the position.  And I'm really just tired of our candy ass approach to it. 
×
×
  • Create New...