Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

RANKING ALL 32 OFFENSIVE LINE UNITS HEADING INTO THE 2017 SEASON


ladypanther

Recommended Posts

12 hours ago, LinvilleGorge said:

If we truly do field a borderline top 10 OL, we're winning the Super Bowl. Straight up.

I think that's also on Cam too, my man.  He's gotta revert back to 2015 form, or better.  I would love to see him have an over 62 percent completion percentage this year.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 hours ago, Hoenheim said:

I call BS , our tackle situation is a complete mystery until weve played a few games. 

yes but three things:

our interior is very good

potential is there

and i dont think there are many teams with great o lines, so the fact our interior is so good, that gives us that push.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 hours ago, LinvilleGorge said:

If we truly do field a borderline top 10 OL, we're winning the Super Bowl. Straight up.

Only if the O-line can actually stay together. For once, I'll take mediocre Ugly play if it means the worst injuries only take guys out a week or so. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Kalil will be better than expected. Coaching had a lot to do with his drop, coupled with injury. A good prospect coming out of college who handled the work well in rookie season but then dropped off in later seasons points to carrying over good coaching in college and lesser coaching in the pros.

Give him a season with us and we might be thinking we got a bargain.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, nctarheel0619 said:

I think that's also on Cam too, my man.  He's gotta revert back to 2015 form, or better.  I would love to see him have an over 62 percent completion percentage this year.  

Cam is never going to be a Brady or Brees type of precision passer. But, if we revamp our offense to include more easy passes, we should see a good bump in his completion percentage. By and large, we're asking him to throw the hardest passes a QB has to throw - downfield throws to well covered WRs. That's a relatively low percentage throw for anyone.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Would Morgan or Beason have been HOFers' if injuries hadn't derailed their careers?  I was not a close watcher of the game when Morgan was in his prime but I thought Beason had a few seasons at close to Lukes' level of play.
    • Franchise QBs feast when things are rolling and the tide that raises boats when things are going sideways.  Bryce isn't that. He's a complimentary player, that's it.  When the defense and STs are on point, he plays loose and it shows.  When we are in a dog fight and things haven't gone our way, he struggles.  It's that simple. He's not a horrible QB, but he's not top tier either.  So the question begs, is this worthy of a second contract?  The answer should be no.  It definitely is my answer. Bryce will never be a QB that can produce wins largely on his arm.  That's a FRANCHISE QB, any other QB is simply a placeholder at the starter's position until that guy can be found.   At some point the excuses of lack of weapons will be a straw man.  Heck, it's nearly there now.  I mean if he doesn't look even better than last year will we blame it on the TE position?  'Well if Bryce only had a player like Kelce, Kittle or Gronk on this team...'  Are we really going to do that?  
    • When I arrived at college, I was 18, not too much younger than some of these draft picks.  It was not a huge school, but there were guys on the team who were 21, 22, 23....playing ahead of me.  I was seventh on the depth chart.  Those guys have been through a few seasons, were stronger, more knowledgeable.  I was a better raw player than some of them, but those other factors matter.  As I grew stronger, more familiar with the playbook, and learned what it was like to play in college, I gradually improved and with that, I rose up the depth chart.  It took most of my freshman year for the light to come on.  Had the coach thrown me into the starting lineup day 1, I would have probably failed.    And that was college.  So I agree with you based on my experience on a much lower level.  Frankly, I think that is why so many kids drafted to fill huge gaps bust.  The teams are desperate.  Anyone who looks to fill vacancies in the starting lineup through the draft is desperate.  You draft depth to develop.  For this reason, I say, "Let Walker start for a while."  Maybe Brazzell can be our WR 4.  Throw Hunter into a rotation and ask him to do one or two things.  Freeling needs some strength and he needs to work on run blocking.
×
×
  • Create New...