Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

When to be concerned about Curtis Samuel?


Jeremy Igo

Recommended Posts

Yes. Very worried. As a rookie snaps are invaluable. 

CMC is getting used to the strength and speed he'll see in the NFL. 

This is prime time if you're a rookie. He has to learn what in his arsenal works in the NFL and throw away everything else. That takes reps, in pads.

Yes

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yes, the time to be concerned is now. If you expect him to be an integral part of this offense, he needs these reps and these preseason games. He missed too much time already in OTAs & minicamp. Missing practice for various things has been a trend for him since the draft. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 I was concerned when we selected him. Lightning fast but undersized RB being converted to slot?

Best case he can perform multiple roles adapting with ease and be a multi-threat. We are harder to read, AND we have cover at RB, WR and ST. I can totally see why we would want that.

Worst case he gets injured and initially struggles with the physicality of the NFL. His injury setback means he is setback in learning his part in the team. He takes up a roster spot but struggles to make an impact. This isn't an impossible scenario.

I'm not saying either scenario will be the outcome. I hope he recovers and lives up to all his potential. Right now though I am not feeling massively confident about that. Looking forward to him proving me wrong. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, ItsPantone278 said:

Odell Beckham Jr had some hamstring issues his during his rookie camps if I remember correctly..  He seemed to turn out alright.

Yep, and missed the first four games as well, I believe.

It shouldn't be a problem physically as I'm sure they will be careful with him.  But it's the reps he'll miss that will initially keep him on the sidelines early.  But as long as he's ready for the Super Bowl, I'm good!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Malcom Spence is the best player remaining, hope he’s there.
    • The era that you played in, and, more importantly, who you played with actually matters. Honestly, that's why these issues will be debated forever, as it's just difficult to say that this person or that person is better when you're discussing the passage of time. As for me, after Rice, Moss and maybe Megatron and T.O., there's probably a dozen or so guys that can be argued about to the cows come home. Personally, I'm not putting Fitz, Harrison, Johnson, Evans, or especially D-Hop, Jefferson, Chase or Hill definitely in front of Smitty (and Colston ain't even in the discussion). Context and all that stuff actually matters. Things like the triple crown matter. 
    • Some of those guys? Yeah honestly you can.  I would 100% take Steve Smith over Larry Fitzgerald, Harrison, even Mike Evans. He is 100% a better player than those guys in his prime. If you look at the numbers Smith is historically under targeted in comparison to his contemporaries. He was only targeted 150 times or more only once in his career. Fitzgerald for example was targeted well above that 9 different seasons. Had Smith played with Peyton, Brady, Greatest Show on Turf, or even with Warner in Arizona he would broken records. His 2008 season was ridiculous accumulating 1400 yards in 13 games on less than 80 receptions. All time he also lost a season due to injury in 04, barely played WR as a rookie. Got robbed of 1k season with Clausen. Thats easily another 1800yds minimum that should have been tacked on to his #s. The only guys I’d say for certain are better than Smith are Rice, Moss, TO, Megatron, Julio Jones, Antonio Brown.
×
×
  • Create New...