Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Barnwell puts Panthers in top Super Bowl contender tier

Cary Kollins

By Cary Kollins,
in Carolina Panthers

Recommended Posts

Cary Kollins Experienced

Cary Kollins

Posted
Posted

Bill Barnwell expects the Panthers to rebound with top ten units on both sides of the ball. FWIW, he has the Falcons in the same tier as the Lions and Cowboys.

Carolina Panthers

Super Bowl odds: 3.1 percent (tied for ninth)

The numbers suggested that Carolina was likely to decline last season, but nobody saw them falling from 15-1 to 6-10 after winning the NFC Championship in 2015. The Panthers went from 6-1 in one-score games in 2015 to 2-6 last season, so while they declined significantly, it wasn't quite as big of a drop-off as their raw win total might indicate. They also lost their two best players for stretches of time when Cam Newton and Luke Kuechly went down with injuries. Ideally, the Panthers won't need to give Derek Anderson two starts.

Since-fired general manager Dave Gettleman built his offseason around protecting Newton, and while I might take issue with the decision to give new left tackle Matt Kalil a five-year contract with $31 million guaranteed, it's at least a new body with some (distant) track record of success. New receiving backs Christian McCaffrey and Curtis Samuel should provide useful intermediate targets, with McCaffrey also helping to shoulder some of the running load that had been thrust upon Newton and Jonathan Stewart. If James Bradberry continues to improve and develops into a No. 1 corner, the Panthers could look more like their 2015 selves.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Khyber53 Grand Master

Khyber53

Posted
Posted
2 minutes ago, TheSpecialJuan said:

This is also the same guy that predicted we would blow away the Broncos in the Super Bowl. 

That being said, the same could be said for just about everyone on this website. We all had egg on our faces after that one.

But here's to 2017!

Link to comment
Share on other sites
UnluckyCharms Contributor

UnluckyCharms

Posted
Posted
14 minutes ago, Cary Kollins said:

 

I'm not going to bother pointing out the differences between the 2015 SB Panthers lineup and the 2016 season opener lineup that lost by a missed field goal.

Surely you don't mean the lineup that got dominated by an all time great defense?

Besides, everyone and their mothers said our 2016 team would be better than the 2015 team. Added KB back to the mix, lost Josh. Upgraded from Harper to Boston. Finnegan to Bene.  Allen and Cotchery were let go. Got a better punter. Our core remained unchanged. On paper we got younger and faster plus the experience of knowing how they'd come at us. They came at us the exact same way and the the game ended in another loss.

They beat us and they did it both times with bad QB play. That team was just better than ours. Not a chance we beat them 4 times in 2015. 2016 would have been closer.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Cary Kollins Experienced

Cary Kollins

Posted
  • Author
Posted
26 minutes ago, UnluckyCharms said:

Surely you don't mean the lineup that got dominated by an all time great defense?

Besides, everyone and their mothers said our 2016 team would be better than the 2015 team. Added KB back to the mix, lost Josh. Upgraded from Harper to Boston. Finnegan to Bene.  Allen and Cotchery were let go. Got a better punter. Our core remained unchanged. On paper we got younger and faster plus the experience of knowing how they'd come at us. They came at us the exact same way and the the game ended in another loss.

They beat us and they did it both times with bad QB play. That team was just better than ours. Not a chance we beat them 4 times in 2015. 2016 would have been closer.

 

Jonathan Stewart was injured on like the first carry of the game, multiple fumbles all going the Broncos way, Remmers 1v1 vs. Miller because Shula is an idiot, extremely poor and fluky special teams plays etc etc. The Broncos played their best game of the year and the Panthers played their worst by a mile. It happens in one and done games.

 

The Panthers were the much better team in 2015. Football is fluky sometimes.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Randolph Panther Rising Star

Randolph Panther

Posted
Posted
2 hours ago, Cary Kollins said:

 

Jonathan Stewart was injured on like the first carry of the game, multiple fumbles all going the Broncos way, Remmers 1v1 vs. Miller because Shula is an idiot, extremely poor and fluky special teams plays etc etc. The Broncos played their best game of the year and the Panthers played their worst by a mile. It happens in one and done games.

 

The Panthers were the much better team in 2015. Football is fluky sometimes.

Absolute truth! No one will ever convince me the Broncos were better that year.  The Falcons beat us once that year also but they surely werent better.  That was so frustrating of a game.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • cardiackat88.
      Well, the Niners just doomed themselves to mediocrity

      By cardiackat88. · Posted

      Teams do some super stupid stuff with mid-fairly good QBs. I think they are just absolutely terrified they will be stuck with a QB that is not the quality of the QB they have now, even if its someone like Daniel Jones. Lots of trash QBs go in the first round. I encourage you to take a look at the sad, sad list of first round QBs in the last 15 years.  
    • Joe Bear
      Okay, now face the facta guyd

      By Joe Bear · Posted

      No, it will be a raw 6'7" 17-year-old European who just played basketball for the first time in March and who the idiot GM "had first on our board." He'll play the whole G-League season, get in 42 games for the Hornets and average 1.1 ppg on 35% shooting. Been there, seen that.
    • ForJimmy
      JJ Jansen on tanking

      By ForJimmy · Posted

      We missed on Burns at his peak value. That’s the problem with trading for picks 2-3 years away (which people were convinced the Rams would suck by now and these would be higher picks btw). Each year away the pick is the further in value it drops. Fitt was clearly hired based on turning us around quickly. It’s one of the many reasons tanking isn’t really a thing as our player JJ is telling you in this original article. It would take the whole organization from the owners down admitting they aren’t winning soon with Burns and picks 2-3 years away having more value because that’s when we are still rebuilding. It would only make sense if Fitt had a longer leash and would more than likely be the ones making these picks anyway which you wouldn’t want. The question is would you rather have those Rams picks with the strong possibility of Fitt still being here or would you rather Fitt try to “win now” like he did and expedite his firing? Altering the timeline would affect more than just the Rams picks. 
×
×
  • Create New...