Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

18 rushes for 21 yards


AU-panther

Recommended Posts

That is Stewart's rushing total for today.

Is it Stewart? is it the line? or is it coaching?

Personally I think he is too good of a running back to have those kind of totals.  Very rarely do I think to myself that another player would have actually got more out of a play then he does.  If anything, some of his two yard rushes are impressive and other backs might have ended up with a loss.

I often hear announcers talk about how complex our running attack is but I don't see our RBs getting that many "easy" yards like other teams.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, AU-panther said:

That is Stewart's rushing total for today.

Is it Stewart? is it the line? or is it coaching?

Personally I think he is too good of a running back to have those kind of totals.  Very rarely do I think to myself that another player would have actually got more out of a play then he does.  If anything, some of his two yard rushes are impressive and other backs might have ended up with a loss.

I often hear announcers talk about how complex our running attack is but I don't see our RBs getting that many "easy" yards like other teams.

The Lions defensive game plan was to sit on the running game and spy cam. They were forcing Cam to beat them with his arm. That is your explanation. They were sending 8 in the box a lot. That is why Dickson was able to work himself open multiple times for big gains. The Lions were biting on the play action and run options all day.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, BIGH2001 said:

Quit posting this dumb poo.  Ed Dickson (the guy who everyone around here wants to cut every year) had 175 yards receiving.  Its not like our offense wasn't effective.   Some of you act like you have never seen a football game before.

It's quite comical 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Word is that Lawrence showed up and weighed in at nearly 400 pounds for his Bengals medical check. I'd find a reason to fail him. Blood type tested as bacon grease. Fail. We've all seen what happens when a dominant huge, explosive DT can't manage his weight. You're gonna age like milk. Looking like Kris Jenkins 2.0.
    • Hard to interpret some of Brugler's opinions. Capable of running a robust route tree sounds like a lazy thing to say - I'm sure just about every slot TE is capable of running a full route tree... I want to know if he is currently able to (which from tape leads me to a no). Granted, it's pretty common for most receivers/TE not having a full route tree developed before they get drafted. Agility/acceleration after the catch hasn't shown up on his tape (at least his Oregon tape) for those dig/out breaking routes while it has for the seam and slant routes. Agree he has a good physical build and he is very good running seam routes. His build definitely helps him to shield defenders and create a large target point for the QB. Drops were a concern, but it could be focus drops just like T-Mac was/is prone to. Run blocking is an accurate statement, but again, we have only seen him run block in the slot/backfield - inline blocking is a whole different animal. With his athleticism, he definitely has a high ceiling. I just think he also has a low floor and don't like taking that big of a risk on a mid 1st rounder. I think this is a deep TE draft and would much rather target one in the 3rd or later. He's very boom or bust to me - bust in terms of being worth a 1st round pick, not an out of the NFL in a few years type bust. I feel like he gives me Evan Engram vibes. Not saying that Evan Engram was/is a bad NFL player, just that most people would agree he shouldn't have been drafted in the 1st.
×
×
  • Create New...