Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

4-2


cookinbrak

Recommended Posts

1 minute ago, Chardee MacDennis said:

So you are saying we lose to Packers, Bucs twice, Falcons twice, and Saints again? 

That's exactly what Im saying. Maybe we beat MN and split with the Bucs but I'll be shocked if we dont implode. Our defense is terrible, and our QB has to play like a created player in Madden every week for us to have a shot

Link to comment
Share on other sites

In terms of the schedule, we're not in a bad spot. 4-2 is always a good record to have at this point for any team. Plenty of season left. The way we've lost those two games, this one in particular, is the problem.

We got manhandled and out-coached by a team that was very beatable.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 minutes ago, BIGH2001 said:

I'm sure most of us would have taken 4-2 at this point with the schedule we had. What is unacceptable is that we are 1-2 at home.

Bingo. Its hard to reconcile how a team that looks so good against NE and Detroit can be this bad at home. 

Objectively speaking, 4-2 is not bad. Just so deflating losing this way at home and with the Luke injury 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

18 minutes ago, Seltzer said:

Bingo. Its hard to reconcile how a team that looks so good against NE and Detroit can be this bad at home. 

Objectively speaking, 4-2 is not bad. Just so deflating losing this way at home and with the Luke injury 

Shot week and bad coaching don't mix well. We could have easy won if our offense would have just not turned the ball over. 14 points off of ints are killer. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Like I said before, I don't get the "only as a UDFA" sentiment, you have to keep following your board. Now if Pavia falls to what amounts to the supplementary UDFA section of the board, that's great, but if he's sitting at the top when you're picking day three (yes, I can't see him being drafted before day three), then you pull the trigger. Rounds 5-7 don't generally provide keepers anyway, you can use them for players that you want to take a closer look at that you may be able to develop.  Pavia may not translate to the pros. Nobody would bet anything of value on it. But, he was highly productive in college due to his play extension abilities, "body torque" mechanics on short and intermediate throws, and good accuracy on said throws. And, he has that dawg in him to be sure.  All that being said, Drew Allar will probably be able to be had on day three, and if it comes down to it--due to nothing but my prejudice against short, weak-armed QBs--I'd pick Allar.
    • Yeah, receivers contracts are crazy, and it's probably not going to change. You almost have to take your swings--keep some picks at WR churning between rounds one through three in order to keep your costs down and give you options at contract time. Creating that value surplus appears to be more important at WR and all the premium positions than getting a non-premium position player who generally are just easier to replace as it pertains to value. The holy grail is to hit on a premium position late, but due to the gradually declining hit rate on days one and two that drops off a cliff day three, you basically have to get lucky. 
    • Very interesting indeed. It did make my head swim more. It said a lot, but it still didn't give any concrete answers. Kinda makes me want to pivot back towards a premium position though...
×
×
  • Create New...