Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Deep threat WR on the trading block


CRA

Recommended Posts

He isn’t a choir boy...

but Martavis Bryant has requested a trade from the Steelers.  Unhappy with his role.

we have a good relationship with the Steelers, he has local ties (Clemson) and dude can defiantly take the top off a defense. 

Issue of course....is the weed problem.  

 

I’d say if the cost isn’t too high....he would be worth the gamble.  Dude is a freak.  But we all know it ain’t happening 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, CatTower said:

Who do you demote though?  Unless we could trade Samuel straight up?

You don’t trade a promising rookie because he is behind. 

Bryant, KB and Fun.....that would be a good threesome.   Shepard could go.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, CatTower said:

Who do you demote though?  Unless we could trade Samuel straight up?

Why would we demote anyone? Currently have 4 wideouts on the roster. Can carry five, just cut one of the safeties.

Also why in the hell would we want to trade Samuel?? Give them a 5th or 6th rounder and call it a day.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Saca312 said:

If we get Martavius we get a WR1 that will contend with the WR1s in this division and be near unstoppable.

Bryant is not even close to any of the other top wideouts in our division. Not even a discussion. He's worse than KB and Funch to be honest.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, thomas96 said:

Bryant is not even close to any of the other top wideouts in our division. Not even a discussion. He's worse than KB and Funch to be honest.

He arguably goes deep better than anyone in the division...

all about fitting a role.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, CRA said:

He arguably goes deep better than anyone in the division...

all about fitting a role 

He's just as inconsistent as Ginn was here, if not more inconsistent. Not as fast either. Solid tracking skills and catch radius, yes. But not really a burner. Samuel is our deep threat. Give him time. Anything more than a 5th for Bryant would be retarded.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • And that makes you right. 
    • Mel Kiper said he would retire if Jimmy Clausen wasn't a successful NFL starter too. Just because the experts make a claim doesnt mean it's true either.  Bryce may be a serviceable QB for someone. Serviceable QBs don't bring you a perennial winner or lead you to the playoffs over and over. Serviceable QBs also dont get 50m plus per year deals which is what a Bryce extension would look like.  The stats show he hasn't been even a serviceable QB in the 3 years he's been here. The eye test shows he hasn't put together 2 franchise QB salary games back to back in 3 years.  Complain all you want about people being negative, but people pointing out that Bryce is held to a different standard than anyone else on the team isn't complaining. It's stating the obvious. 
    • We have big bodied WRs and 3 TEs who all have potential and each bring something different to the table. I never saw the need to go out there and try and find a new starting TE.  While it's nice to have a guy like McBride, Bowers, etc, I think a team's better use of the cap is by having TEs on rookie contracts or cheap vets, not having to pay elite TE money.
×
×
  • Create New...