Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Panthers Are Tops In The NFL With Something Special Teams Related. This Is Not A Joke.


Saca312

Recommended Posts

Woah. That's not something you hear everyday. 

The Carolina Panthers Special Teams are one of the best in the NFL at something. Surprisingly, it's not penalties.

The Panthers coverage unit as a whole has been one of the best in the NFL.

http://pantherswire.usatoday.com/2017/10/21/panthers-return-coverage-leads-nfl-through-six-weeks/

Quote

In terms of total yardage allowed on returns, the Panthers have allowed a very small number on both kickoffs and punts.

In six punts returned by opponents, the Panthers have only allowed a total of 29 yards. That’s the second-fewest total punt return yards allowed by a team in the league through six weeks. Only the 49ers have allowed fewer yards, giving up just 24 yards on 14 return attempts.

To put that number into a bit more context, Michael Palardy has punted 21 times in six games. With only six of them being fielded, that’s a credit to the Panthers’ coverage unit and to Palardy, himself, who is averaging almost 45 yards per punt. Eight of his punts have been fair caught, six have landed inside the 20 and only two have gone for touchbacks.

As far as kickoffs go, no team has allowed fewer total yards to this point on kickoff returns than the 45 the Panthers have allowed.

So, Panthers are 2nd best against punt returns and tops against kickoffs. Now, credit is certainly due to Gano and Palardy for being decent at their jobs and making life harder for the returners. However, still something pretty cool.

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, brandon_87 said:

Kickoff numbers don't mean poo since we kick for the touchback instead if the high angle to force a return, but the bunt #s are good

Id rather them start on the 25 everytime than than have them start <25 and then have a big return fir a TD every so often

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

26 minutes ago, The Huddler said:

Id rather them start on the 25 everytime than than have them start <25 and then have a big return fir a TD every so often

 

 

I understand this point of view, but there is another side to this.

How often do you see returners fumble the ball? I would bet it is far more common than kick off returns for a TD. No chance of that with touchbacks.

Only 7 teams have a return average of more than 25 yards.  And since most kicks go at least a couple of yards into the end zone, only a couple of teams have an actual average starting field position beyond the 25. So many more times than not, the opposing team would have a worse starting position if we had returnable kickoffs.

But RR is risk averse so we will keep doing what we do.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I realize it about the expectations, but on paper, we drafted players who would have a chance to compete at positions where any could realistically step in and take the job---Freeling?  Yup.  Hunter?  Yup.  Brazzell?  Yup.  It is likely that all three see the field early and often.  Day 3:  Lee?  I see him as the #3 CB and the job is his when they are ready for him--and it is his to lose.  Hecht?  I loved him in mock research and called him the best C in the draft.  He might play a year behind Fortson or he could take the job--regardless, he is the obvious front runner for the 2027 season.  Wheatley?  I see Ransom and Moehrig as basically the same "in the box" type S.  If Wheatley can learn for a season behind Scott, he has the tools to be a serviceable FS, something this team needs.  Finally, Kuwatch seemed to be a PS pick, and he could be--but to win the 4th ILB job, he needs to beat out Bam Morris-Scott and with a 46.5 vertical (I can't do that on the triple jump) and a superior RAS rating, he looks like a special teamer and depth piece.....I forgot about Morgan's comment about giving up the 5th--probably to get ahead of Detroit.  Freeling has the athleticism and the tools to be the best OT in this draft.  The others lacked arm length or something like that--Freeling simply lacks a ton of experience. 
    • excellent points and insights.  I agree on Tepper.  I guess I worry that his questions and comments might influence the thinking of his employees, that his presence in the room might add pressure to an already stressful situation, but after watching it again, it does not appear to be like that.  Morgan was in charge.  Canales mentioned needing a center, but beyond that, he was there to serve as a consultant, more or less, if asked.  I suppose my point was this--everyone knew their roles, I did not see egos--I saw empowerment.  As for Morgan--I saw a leader that listened to others, made wise decisions, and never lost control.  I was VERY IMPRESSED with Dan Morgan. 
    • Pretty good summation, although I would caution just a bit that there might be a little of over-enhanced expectations. I do agree with the assessment on BPA. It was exceedingly clear they had a specific shopping list. Early on when there was some discussion about the tackles available, Morgan was asked if he was willing to give up a 5th to get Freeling, if it came to that. I think the only way it wasn't a left tackle with that 1st pick is if none that were valued as a 1st were still available.
×
×
  • Create New...