Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

I know it's not keen, but man. Props to Gettlemen again. At least when our QB goes down, we can still win games.


JakeDel5674

Recommended Posts

1 minute ago, KillerKat said:

No we can't. Have you seen Anderson lately? He should be retired already.

I think OP is referring to the fact that not only is their offense terrible without Aaron Rodgers, but their defense is just as bad, if not worse. At least we have the backbone to be successful if Cam is out (hint: great defense).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Jesse said:

I think OP is referring to the fact that not only is their offense terrible without Aaron Rodgers, but their defense is just as bad, if not worse. At least we have the backbone to be successful if Cam is out (hint: great defense).

Correct.  Thank you, sir.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, micnificent28 said:

I don’t think this is fair... they had a plan in place and Brett Hundley was highly thought of as a prospect and the packers had gotten offers for him for a year or so,they just thought he was a good back up. Sometime plans to work out.. but they had a plan.

Hundley coming out of UCLA was garbage.  He had like the most interceptions in that Pac-12 that year.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, GoobyPls said:

No Cam, means no running game, no running games means no milking the clock, which in return means this defense would suffer.

We would be just as bad

Do you see what the Packers have on Defense right now?  No fuging way we would be just as bad as they are.  They are pure garbage.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • okay I found this and it sounds like my hopes for the first surgery being not such a great job seems like it could be actual reality.  I only hoped because that would give a better chance for recovery and ia a possible scenario so I just thought it could be possible. Had no real evidence of it. But I’ll be damned.    This is a detailed report of Brooks’ surgery and the condition of his knee after the failed repair.     https://x.com/jmthrivept/status/2055743129408704806?s= Sparked by some very good questions by @CoachspeakIndex, here’s some info on Jonathon Brooks: 1. Speculation that the first graft/ACLR by Dr. Cooper didn’t “take” or at least was too lax, leading to failure and re-tear. Brooks dealt with issues cutting, progressing in his rehab into the early stages of 2024 and then re-tore it late 2024, requiring a second ACLR in January 2025 (essentially revision). Notably, CAR prolonged Brooks’ rehab process through Sept-Oct due to issues progressing into the next stages of rehab. 2. Second surgery performed by Dr. Neal ElAttrache, who has extensive experience with revisions. He did a double bundle technique, harvesting graft from Brooks’ left patellar tendon and a strip of his right IT Band (his right patellar tendon had been utilized for the prior graft in 2023. The double bundle technique significantly increases rotational stability of the knee, leading to a stronger and more secure graft/reconstruction. Also to note, Brooks’ surgery wasn’t significantly delayed, meaning that the tunnels from his prior ACLR were in good shape and they didn’t need to perform bone grafts to fill in (would have delayed 2nd surgery by 5-6 months). Essentially, reading the tea leaves tells me that everything else except for the graft itself was still in good quality within his knee. Good sign for future.  3. Typically, you see a performance increase anywhere from 16-20 months post-revision. Brooks will be ~21 months out from his second surgery by the time Week 1 hits. His knee should be more stable and stronger this time around, with adequate time for healing and return to all movement patterns. I’m not viewing this situation as a typical “Player __ had TWO ACL tears, he’s cooked” situation. Rather, I’m viewing it as the first procedure failed, but the second procedure is significantly stronger and should allow him to return to form this time around. I don’t know why it posted as a link but there it is.  
    • Jackie, any more reps tomorrow, or is that it for this session?  thanks for the work
    • How can you say they aren’t trying to win now with all the moves made in free agency? Or is trading first round picks the only way to be win now? I’d be fine never trading another first round pick again, win now be damned.
×
×
  • Create New...