Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

oui. bene benwikere going off on sean mcdermott


Saca312

Recommended Posts

i mean he does have a point.

sean mcdermott and brandon beane have been really bad so far, and it's showing.

their offense is a replica of our 2016 offense minus cam newton. their defense is bad after trading their best defender to the jaguars.

they get rid of sammy watkins and robert woods for guys like kelvin benjamin and jordan matthews; both who are huge downgrades. their receivers can't separate while tyrod taylor literally has to try and do what cam newton does in 2016 all the time.

to add on, they invested most of their draft picks into a pathetic 2018 draft.

sean mcdermott benching their best quarterback and making him the scapegoat, and you got ineptitude up there.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I mean Tre Boston is clearly a good every down safety this year for San Diego. Kony is doing well for the Jets but that’s a big scheme difference. Bene’s injury was really severe. He could’ve been a solid depth player. All these players had potential but ultimately coaches would rather start the corpse of Jared Allen or sign and start Michael Griffin three days before the Julio game. 

Josh Norman could have also slipped away. 

These coaches aren’t infallible. poo like that is why people need to chill on making Worley the scapegoat. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It seems like Mcdermott is a no tolerance type of guy. If you're not all in he would make an example of you.

 

I think Tyrod is way better than Peterman I think most would agree.. but Tyrod also seems a bit salty at times and maybe not all in, or don't like the way the system is going who knows.

 

I feel like coaches do this pretty often and this is only getting blown up.

 

Most back up QBs end up getting owned and benching the starting QB is just a example or to light a fire..

the bills defense has been getting worse week after week as well. Sean could be "losing" the team?

 

One person on that team that can be questionable off field sometimes but Lesean McCoy shows up to play anytime his name is called. So props to him.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I realize it about the expectations, but on paper, we drafted players who would have a chance to compete at positions where any could realistically step in and take the job---Freeling?  Yup.  Hunter?  Yup.  Brazzell?  Yup.  It is likely that all three see the field early and often.  Day 3:  Lee?  I see him as the #3 CB and the job is his when they are ready for him--and it is his to lose.  Hecht?  I loved him in mock research and called him the best C in the draft.  He might play a year behind Fortson or he could take the job--regardless, he is the obvious front runner for the 2027 season.  Wheatley?  I see Ransom and Moehrig as basically the same "in the box" type S.  If Wheatley can learn for a season behind Scott, he has the tools to be a serviceable FS, something this team needs.  Finally, Kuwatch seemed to be a PS pick, and he could be--but to win the 4th ILB job, he needs to beat out Bam Morris-Scott and with a 46.5 vertical (I can't do that on the triple jump) and a superior RAS rating, he looks like a special teamer and depth piece.....I forgot about Morgan's comment about giving up the 5th--probably to get ahead of Detroit.  Freeling has the athleticism and the tools to be the best OT in this draft.  The others lacked arm length or something like that--Freeling simply lacks a ton of experience. 
    • excellent points and insights.  I agree on Tepper.  I guess I worry that his questions and comments might influence the thinking of his employees, that his presence in the room might add pressure to an already stressful situation, but after watching it again, it does not appear to be like that.  Morgan was in charge.  Canales mentioned needing a center, but beyond that, he was there to serve as a consultant, more or less, if asked.  I suppose my point was this--everyone knew their roles, I did not see egos--I saw empowerment.  As for Morgan--I saw a leader that listened to others, made wise decisions, and never lost control.  I was VERY IMPRESSED with Dan Morgan. 
    • Pretty good summation, although I would caution just a bit that there might be a little of over-enhanced expectations. I do agree with the assessment on BPA. It was exceedingly clear they had a specific shopping list. Early on when there was some discussion about the tackles available, Morgan was asked if he was willing to give up a 5th to get Freeling, if it came to that. I think the only way it wasn't a left tackle with that 1st pick is if none that were valued as a 1st were still available.
×
×
  • Create New...