Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Can Shula do it?


the butch

Recommended Posts

33 minutes ago, the butch said:

No Samuel.

Stewart has fumblitis.

Greg with a shaky wheel.

Now Cam's thumb.

Going into the most critical 2-game stretch of the season, I ask:  Can Shula do it?

 

ETA:  with a good but not great #1/#2 D

We have number 22 Time to put him to work

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, the butch said:

No Samuel.

Stewart has fumblitis.

Greg with a shaky wheel.

Now Cam's thumb.

Going into the most critical 2-game stretch of the season, I ask:  Can Shula do it?

 

ETA:  with a good but not great #1/#2 D

Samuel doesn’t really factor IMO. I mean he has Clay and will have Byrd back.  

Did we go into Foxboro and beat Brady without Greg?  Pretty sure we did. 

We can beat Brees 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

lol no

 

we will have Armah sitting in pads on the sidelines facing one of the only teams we play with slower run stopping LBs where a FB leading a RB is crucial.

We will go up the middle instead of sweeps and getting out and challenging their conditioning, which isn't great from the games ive watched of them. No adjustment to Cam Jordans sack dance. Because he sacks Cam Newton every time we play them, causing trouble.

Vaccaro will get away with dirty plays, but Byrd is going to burn his ass on turf. They don't have much film on that guy. they aren't expecting speed without Samuel. they will load the box IMO mainly for cam running. Byrd can have huge plays if they dial them up and don't just put him out there for 3 plays.

Im just getting pissed thinking about the saints. I hope Norwell is full devil mode slinging saints around. I want to see CMC challenge Kamaras big plays when Kurt Coleman is trying to catch up to him.

 

Let Jarius Byrd fug round and get some revenge. Jarius was hype as poo for Luke when he scooped the TD at MetLife. I think he's enjoying his time here and looks like a vet.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Would be happy with Lomu or Iheanachor at 19. Fano is intriguing but I don't think he makes it.
    • II see it this way: We have to look at long-term needs and current depth.  We have filled some key spots with players on one-year contracts.  I firmly believe that they intend to pay Bryce some big bucks next year.  That means you cannot hope that your rookies in 2027 can fill the spots vacated by the veterans you could not afford to re-sign.   We need to consider the cap and the fact that the need to start a rookie is not viewed as a positive by coaches and general managers, but they value first contracts--so it is a delicate balance. I think they have to look at the cap by position--"Can we afford a $50m QB and a $100m OL?  That is half the cap, before you pay your WRs and RBs and TEs.  They need to start getting younger on the OL as well.   I am not suggesting that we draft OT in round 1, but we could and I would get it.  RT on a 1-year deal, they may have intel about Ickey (who was not the best LT, to be honest) and 32-year old Moton is on a bad wheel.   Now if you go by Morgan's history, you can almost tell what position we are going to address with the first pick by noting the positions he has not focused on in free agency.  DT, considering the lack of performance by those not named Derrick Brown and the loss of Robinson, is screaming to be addressed with a top player.  Wharton is not an early down DT (DE if you want to get technical) and our LBs need to be clean--they were not in 2025.  Look for a DT early. I also think we will address ILB (pass covering Will) on day 2.  The other day 2 pick will be an OT, in my view. Do not rule out CB.  We are thin there too, and Jackson is in his final year.  I am not sure that we love Smith-Wade.  Some crackhead on here talked about moving him to S----stay tuned.   Hopefully, a team wanting Ty Simpson will move up and offer us a pick or two to move back. DT WILB OT OC QB  (you heard it here 337th--but this pick could come sooner than you think.      
    • Bryce had some bad games, but he had some good ones as well (and this is coming from a Bryce skeptic). I think it's a little simplistic to put all the offensive woes on Bryce, you also should be looking at O-line play, receiver play, RB and TE play, and also coaching. There's no way when I look at the offense in it's totality am I ready to say that a so-so to bad offense was all on Bryce, and, I also can't say that we don't need to upgrade any position on offense, save Tetairoa McMillan (who also wasn't perfect) and maybe the starting guards and T-mo.
×
×
  • Create New...