Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Scenario for the #2 seed


usmcpanthers

Recommended Posts

7 minutes ago, brandon_87 said:

Are we not alive for the 1? Why is the thread for the 2?

We are but Philly would have to lose out and they play the raiders and the cowboys, I had them splitting at worst case and that still puts them above us.

 

I forgot about their tiebreaker on us...We can't get the #1 seed.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, brandon_87 said:

Damn, that sucks, the egg we laid against Chicago really came back to bite us

Every loss of ours has come back to bite us for seeding. We’d essentially have the division locked up if we beat the Aints once, losing to the Bears sucked and losing to the Eagles made the 1 seed essentially not achievable.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

54 minutes ago, JPino said:

I can’t remember where I heard it, but I remember an analyst last year saying “You can’t win a playoff spot early in the season, but you can lose one.” I know that we will probably make the playoffs, but it’s around this time of year that you realize those Philly and Chicago Losses really bit us in the ass. If we would’ve beaten Chicago we would be the number 2 seed, had we beaten Philly, we’d be the number 1. 

Said it then, will say it again...the Chicago loss will bite us in the butt.  Without a couple balls bouncing our way, that game could have kept us out of the playoffs potentially.

We lost a couple that we should have won, and won a couple we should have lost...but here we are.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Nails said:

Too good to be true.  Then again, not too far fetched.

Just wish it didn't potentially come down to a depleted Bucs team in Week 17. Maybe after we put a whoopin' on them, they'll be out to make a statement week 17. One can dream.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, EgoDogg said:

Just wish it didn't potentially come down to a depleted Bucs team in Week 17. Maybe after we put a whoopin' on them, they'll be out to make a statement week 17. One can dream.

Us getting the 2 seed with no Seahawks or Cowboys would be more than enough if not.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, usmcpanthers said:

We are but Philly would have to lose out and they play the raiders and the cowboys, I had them splitting at worst case and that still puts them above us.

 

I forgot about their tiebreaker on us...We can't get the #1 seed.

Yea, for some reason I thought Philly had 3 losses on them, sucks

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, JPino said:

I can’t remember where I heard it, but I remember an analyst last year saying “You can’t win a playoff spot early in the season, but you can lose one.” I know that we will probably make the playoffs, but it’s around this time of year that you realize those Philly and Chicago Losses really bit us in the ass. If we would’ve beaten Chicago we would be the number 2 seed, had we beaten Philly, we’d be the number 1. 

If Ifs and Buts were Candy and Nuts it would be Christmas (Holiday season for you sensitive types) all year long. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • You may be interested to know that the average depth of separation is dependent upon the type of route run. Though go-routes are the most type of route run, they also produce the least amount of separation (and, of course, completions).   "The average pass catcher runs a go route on nearly a quarter of all routes (22.3%), the highest percentage of any route type in our data. However, those routes are targeted roughly 1 out of 10 times (10.8 percent), the lowest target rate of any route. The WR screen is the least-run route (3.4%), and it's the only route where the average target is behind the line of scrimmage. But it's also targeted at the highest rate (40.7%) and early in the play (1.6 seconds average time to throw). The most targeted routes outside of the WR Screen? The out (27.8%) and slant (25.2%) routes are the next most popular across the league."     "The most valuable routes by expected points added per target were the post (+0.48) and corner (+0.43) routes. The go route (+0.19) ranked seventh on the list of 10 route types. The go route (+0.19) ranked seventh on the list of 10 route types. One possible reason for this: It's harder to separate on go routes, which put the player on a straight path, than on posts or corners, which ask the player to make a cut. Targeted pass catchers on posts and corners average 2.4 yards and 2.3 yards of separation from the nearest defender, respectively, while pass catchers targeted on go routes average just 1.8 yards of separation."   https://www.nfl.com/news/next-gen-stats-intro-to-new-route-recognition-model#:~:text=Targeted pass catchers on posts,) and slant (+0.26).   I would expect that Thielen would have an easier time catching the ball based that he runs the routes where it's easier to get open. Tet? Yet to be seen, but we may be better served getting him on some slants and crossers also.  In general, receivers are going to average a lower completion percentage and yards of separation on certain types of routes than others, that's why we shouldn't necessarily be taking stats, even advanced ones, at face value, as there are dynamics that most aren't even thinking about.  In terms of Tet, he's bigger and somewhat slower than a smaller dude, so you'd expect him not to have as much separation on go-routes, but his catch radius is massive and his hands are awesome. Hitting him in stride will probably be killer, but of course QBs are less accurate on go-routes according to the stats. Depending upon Tet's route versatility and how he is used, we could have a unicorn though. He's relatively fast, has great hands and gets YAC (and on an off note, if X can hold on to the ball, he's dangerous as well because he already has shown some separation ability).    
×
×
  • Create New...