Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Nfl wants Panthers to remain in the Carolinas


jfra78

Recommended Posts

http://www.espn.com/nfl/story/_/id/21839807/nfl-first-choice-carolina-panthers-remain-charlotte

"The franchise in Carolina is successful both on the field and from a business perspective as far as community impact,'' Lockhart said. "So we think that it's very important that franchises, particularly ones that have achieved the success of the Panthers, stay in the market where they're playing."

Good news for all Panther fans!

Also in in the article was an outline for purchasing a franchise

 

During the call, Lockhart outlined what the sale of the Panthers involved. He said the new controlling owner:

  • Is required to individually own at least 30 percent of equity. (Most owners typically own more than that, and some own 100 percent).

  • Must to be able to demonstrate financial wherewithal to acquire and effectively operate the team.

  • Must have full voting control over all matters involving the club and stadium, including all football operations.

  • Cannot exhaust his or her (total) financial resources to make a bare-minimum equity acquisition.

  • Is limited to a maximum of $250 million in total debt related to the club. Other debt is permitted beyond that debt ceiling, but it has to be collateralized by non-football assets.

In addition to that:

  • The payment must be paid in cash or financed.

  • A new ownership group is limited to a maximum of 25 co-owners.

  • A public company or not-for-profit can't buy the team.

  • All owners must be approved by three-quarters (24 of 32) of member clubs

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, countryboi said:

 

so when someone buys the panthers they are going to pull up with 3 billion dollars in cash? that sounds like the plot to an oceans 11 movie. 

Doesn’t mean physical cash. Means cash assets as in money in a checking account or other type of account that can be wired out.

 

im just wondering what JR is gonna do with all his Bils 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

44 minutes ago, Asurfaholic said:

Doesn’t mean physical cash. Means cash assets as in money in a checking account or other type of account that can be wired out.

 

im just wondering what JR is gonna do with all his Bils 

Him, Smitty and TD will all have a nice dinner?0

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, PantherCam213 said:

I would think this.

All owners must be approved by three-quarters (24 of 32) of member clubs

That's not his problem, this is his problem 

  • Is required to individually own at least 30 percent of equity. (Most owners typically own more than that, and some own 100 percent).

30 Percent of the Panthers is 750 million dollars for a guy that has net worth of 800 million. Like I said before the NFL is a billionaire game. Diddy never had a chance

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, countryboi said:

That's not his problem, this is his problem 

  • Is required to individually own at least 30 percent of equity. (Most owners typically own more than that, and some own 100 percent).

30 Percent of the Panthers is 750 million dollars for a guy that has net worth of 800 million. Like I said before the NFL is a billionaire game. Diddy never had a chance

Supposedly ESPN says Diddy signed paperwork but hard to believe that.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Personal preference but despite loving blue as a color in general, it's not often I like it being such a dominant color.  That and it's hard to knock off the traditional white on white as my personal favorite combination. Not only is it a clean look, the majority of the greatest moments this franchise has had - 03 Super Bowl run, 15 Cam to Olsen against the Seahawks, etc - were with that combo. 
    • You people keep making me defend the 2024 class.  Look XL might as well be 2nd rounder, guys drafted in the 30s-50s do not have what the first round 1-10 have. There's a huge gap. *Most drafts have a tier system that varies. 1-8, 9-14, 15-30, 30-50. Each level there's a huge talent fall or more risk involid. SInce Im a interwebz grandpa, "Back in my day" WRs took 3 full seasons before you knew the ones that had the talent. XL still has time to figure it out and if he doesn't, toss on 20 LBs and give TE a try.....Ive seen him blocking the number off players recently... I still holding out he and BY and...Dave can ALL figure out how to break XL out of the slump.  Im not going to defend Brooks, it was wrong. I heard they viewed him as a first rounder, still.......no more. Wallace is looking better each week after that terrible week one, he's looking more and more like a great pick now. Sanders- a little unlucky, but he's the #1 TE on the roster. He's just got to figure out the silly minor injuries bug. Great pick for a 4th if he does, CSW- Unlucky with minor injuries too, but he's the starting NB. Great pick for the 5th round too as he's a legit starter. Crumedy- part of a deep DL and facts are he is the 50s on roster ranks. Still for a 208, that's about what's normally happens. He's still on the team and next year could have a better role.  UDFA- Coker and RIchardson. They also signed Tremayne form that year, he made the deeeeep WR group and plays a solid ST.    Im a former draft nerd... If you draft 2 starters and a top backup, that's a good/great draft. *Thus far this 2024 class has netted 4 starters, one backup, and one prayer. If you include and should the UFDA its increases the impact. 
    • Sounds like no Garrett Wilson next week…
×
×
  • Create New...