Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

You can't settle for field goals inside your opponents 10 yard line and expect to win in the playoffs.


Eazy-E

Recommended Posts

Some of you may disagree but 4th and short you need to be going for it when it is do or die and Cam Newton is your quarterback. Even if you fail you have the opposing team backed up in their own end zone with the potential for a safety. 

I can't believe Ron still plays not to lose in the playoffs. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

We got Shula'd. Could go for it on 4th, or we could just not call terrible plays and have WRs drop easy TDs on the early downs... Rivera's flaw is not firing Shula, otherwise he's very solid. Loyalty over production will end up being his demise unfortunately.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, thomas96 said:

We got Shula'd. Could go for it on 4th, or we could just not call terrible plays and have WRs drop easy TDs on the early downs... Rivera's flaw is not firing Shula, otherwise he's very solid. Loyalty over production will end up being his demise unfortunately.

Yeah Shula fuging sucked it up but it's Ron's call to settle for a field goal.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, brandon_87 said:

I agree with this to an extent, being that it IS the playoffs, you kinda gotta go off how your defense is playing, and at that time, the D wasn't doing too well. Wish we had gone for it though

On the first FG that Gano shanked the D had just stuffed the Saints.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, thomas96 said:

We got Shula'd. Could go for it on 4th, or we could just not call terrible plays and have WRs drop easy TDs on the early downs... Rivera's flaw is not firing Shula, otherwise he's very solid. Loyalty over production will end up being his demise unfortunately.

I hear ya... but it's more WR's dropping TD passes than Shula IMO (at least in this game).  If Clay catches that TD... the game has a completely different complexion.  Really fuged us

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, PantherNation123 said:

I hear ya... but it's more WR's dropping TD passes than Shula IMO (at least in this game).  If Clay catches that TD... the game has a completely different complexion.  Really fuged us

Yep, that was a HUGE drop only compounded by the fact that Gano then shanked a chip shot and the Saints proceeded to throw a 80 yard TD bomb all within the matter of seconds of game time. Massive swing of events.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, LinvilleGorge said:

Yep, that was a HUGE drop only compounded by the fact that Gano then shanked a chip shot and the Saints proceeded to throw a 80 yard TD bomb all within the matter of seconds of game time. Massive swing of events.

Exactly... simple things like this can completely change games.  If Clay catches that ball (which I have to believe Samuel/Byrd/most other WR's) would, or if Gano makes that FG... we probably are headed to MN

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 hours ago, PantherNation123 said:

I hear ya... but it's more WR's dropping TD passes than Shula IMO (at least in this game).  If Clay catches that TD... the game has a completely different complexion.  Really fuged us

 

8 hours ago, LinvilleGorge said:

Yep, that was a HUGE drop only compounded by the fact that Gano then shanked a chip shot and the Saints proceeded to throw a 80 yard TD bomb all within the matter of seconds of game time. Massive swing of events.

It's both. Shula's flaw has long been red zone efficiency, and many of the play calls in the red zone yesterday just made no sense at all. He called a solid game within the 20s but completely fuged it up when it mattered most. Plus yes WR drops which doomed us as well.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm pretty sure Rivera dictates a win his mind by how many field goals are accumulate in a game.

We're 7 years into Rivera right?   Things won't change.    This guy coaches like he's in the 80's and we'll continuously be out-coached when it matters most.     Rivera plays for field goals, Payton plays for touchdowns, that's why we lost.

When you play for field goals, you have a tight window.     We could have tied that game if Gano didn't miss the chip in earlier. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Zaximus said:

When you play for field goals, you have a tight window.     We could have tied that game if Gano didn't miss the chip in earlier. 

Even worse, we could have won that game on the final drive...even with that intentional grounding :( 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

6 hours ago, Zaximus said:

I'm pretty sure Rivera dictates a win his mind by how many field goals are accumulate in a game.

We're 7 years into Rivera right?   Things won't change.    This guy coaches like he's in the 80's and we'll continuously be out-coached when it matters most.     Rivera plays for field goals, Payton plays for touchdowns, that's why we lost.

When you play for field goals, you have a tight window.     We could have tied that game if Gano didn't miss the chip in earlier. 

I use the Denver Broncos with Elway and Shannahan as a prime example . Elway was stuck with Dan Reeves for the longest time , couldnt win the SB until Mike Shannhan came to town . They started winning bowls when they got a more complete team to help a generational QB win . 

Its no suprise either that 99 Rams turned it around after getting a new HC/OC and getting a couple key players in Faulk in Free Agency and Torry Holt in the draft. 

The theme of all of this is that , coaching MATTERS sooo much. And making a more complete team with dangerous weapons on offense especially matters in a  league that in modern times favors offenses rule wise. Rivera and Shula are dinosaurs stuck in the 80s trying and failing to build a historic defense and wasting an incredible QB talent away with poor coaching descions and mediocre skill position talent . 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I feel like this trade just lives rent free in people's heads and keeps morphing into different things. First thing is that the rumored trade was for future firsts. They wouldn't have any extra picks in 2023; the firsts would have been for 2024 and 2025. With very few exceptions, NFL GMs don't value picks that far away. You have to have a lot of job security to pull that off. Like Chiefs, Eagles, Rams kinda stability. That's obviously not the case with David Tepper, especially since he'd just fired his head coach. No GM except for like Howie Roseman is going to trade an asset you have now for a future asset you probably get to use.  Second, at the time you'd have to assume these are first rounders late in the first round. Obviously currency is currency and the panthers need young players, but these weren't slam dunk top ten picks. At the end of the day there's one pick that separates a first and second round pick.  Lastly, the only place that ever reported this trade was the Rams. All the reporters just repeated what McVay said and it became gospel. We have no idea how serious the negotiations were, if they ever really happened, if the offer was real, etc. And I personally believe McVay and Sneed are the kind of guys who would make up rumors like that to fug up other teams, mostly because I assume if I've thought of it someone smarter than me has.  I don't know how you'd call it the greatest draft haul of all time. Firsts quickly lose their value the farther out they are and Burns had 16.5 sacks last season. And anyway those picks would probably just been tossed into the burning inferno of the Bryce trade up so it's a moot point anyway. 
×
×
  • Create New...