Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Am I overreacting to say we need an entire secondary change?


beastson

Recommended Posts

Both corners, slot corner and safeties need to be replaced. Your secondary needs to be independent of your pass rush, not dependent. What we have now aint got the answers Sway

I would call the Seahawks and ask what would like for Earl Thomas. I'm going after Malcolm Butler, TJ Ward, I'm bringing Tre Boston back and Kyle Fuller if we can't get him. I wish we could bring Leonard Johnson back but we're stuck with Captain it seems

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yea

We need to replace the S's though. Even if we changed all of our secondary and keep those old DEs without getting younger there it won't matter if our better corners have to cover for longer and the WR gets open anyway.

The best way to win is with pressure so even with our CBs we need to keep the DEs strong and younger. The Saints have literally 100X the secondary we did and we coulda won the game and they didn't make poo for plays on the ball...Clay just dropped it and 79 yards from half a funchess is respectable....shows you what pressure does as NO beat us with pressure not from their elite secondary.

Last time i checked they let Bersin do em
Last time I checked they let CMC get his best play of the year
Last time I checked Funchess has like 1 arm and a leg out there doing 79 on em.
Last time I checked Cam went for 349 and 2 shoulda been 4(fun/Clay)
Last time I checked Olsen 3rd leg Gregged em.

Passrush bruh...sack won em the game.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, beastson said:

Both corners, slot corner and safeties need to be replaced. Your secondary needs to be independent of your pass rush, not dependent. What we have now aint got the answers Sway

I would call the Seahawks and ask what would like for Earl Thomas. I'm going after Malcolm Butler, TJ Ward, I'm bringing Tre Boston back and Kyle Fuller if we can't get him. I wish we could bring Leonard Johnson back but we're stuck with Captain it seems

I don’t like who we have.  I think we need 5 new starters.  It’s just going to be tough to fill all those holes in one offseason with limited cap space.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, Fox007 said:

Yea

We need to replace the S's though. Even if we changed all of our secondary and keep those old DEs without getting younger there it won't matter if our better corners have to cover for longer and the WR gets open anyway.

The best way to win is with pressure so even with our CBs we need to keep the DEs strong and younger. The Saints have literally 100X the secondary we did and we coulda won the game and they didn't make poo for plays on the ball...Clay just dropped it and 79 yards from half a funchess is respectable....shows you what pressure does as NO beat us with pressure not from their elite secondary.

Last time i checked they let Bersin do em
Last time I checked they let CMC get his best play of the year
Last time I checked Funchess has like 1 arm and a leg out there doing 79 on em.
Last time I checked Cam went for 349 and 2 shoulda been 4(fun/Clay)
Last time I checked Olsen 3rd leg Gregged em.

Passrush bruh...sack won em the game.

Rivera is a biiiiig believer in pass rush.

So yeah, don't expect major changes on the back end.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

One thing people need to remember is we played a lot of good quarterbacks this year. Brees and Ryan x2. Stafford, Brady, Rodgers, Wentz. Even guys like Keenum and Winston were plenty productive this year. When a good QB is on and isn't getting pressured, they will carve up even the best secondaries. LOB at the height of it's powers wouldn't have slowed down Brees last night. 

With that said, yes of course the secondary needs work. Hell, every position group other than QB needs to be looked at improved on a yearly basis. The glaring weakness though is safety, too many times we were beat over the top when a safety should have been in position to stop the play. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Randolph Panther said:

Bradbury has really been a disappointment this year. After last year I thought he was going to be a lock down cornerback 

Not sure what you saw out of him that would make you think he would be a lockdown corner. I did think he could be a serviceable CB after last season, but man did he just look lost out there this season.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, FugAllY'all said:

One thing people need to remember is we played a lot of good quarterbacks this year. Brees and Ryan x2. Stafford, Brady, Rodgers, Wentz. Even guys like Keenum and Winston were plenty productive this year. When a good QB is on and isn't getting pressured, they will carve up even the best secondaries. LOB at the height of it's powers wouldn't have slowed down Brees last night. 

With that said, yes of course the secondary needs work. Hell, every position group other than QB needs to be looked at improved on a yearly basis. The glaring weakness though is safety, too many times we were beat over the top when a safety should have been in position to stop the play. 

They also let Josh McCown roast them. The only QBs who didn't do anything were Hoyer, Taylor, & Trubisky. Otherwise, every other QB we played had their way. If the secondary was capable of creating some turnovers, that could at least excuse the infinite amount of passing yards they give up each game. Unfortunately, nobody in our secondary can do that.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Wow, didn't catch that!  I don't think Chuba's a power back either but he's usually good at getting that 1 or 2 yards. That was an uncharacteristic day for him.
    • The referee assigned to this game is Shawn Smith. This is a critical data point for betting purposes because his crew has one of the most distinct, long-term statistical biases in the NFL. "Road Team" Bias: Historically, Shawn Smith is known as the "Road Team Referee." In a league where home teams usually win ~55% of the time, home teams in Smith's games have historically won at a rate far below league average (often hovering around 40-42%). Against The Spread (ATS): The trend is even starker here. Home teams have covered the spread at a rate of roughly 37-40% in his career. The Mechanism: Analysis shows his crew tends to call a higher rate of False Start and Unnecessary Roughness penalties on the Home Team. This negates the traditional home-field advantage (crowd noise causing false starts for the visitors). Impact on This Game: This specific assignment heavily favors the Buccaneers (Road Team). If you believe the referee influences the game, Smith's presence suggests the Panthers will struggle to get "home cooking" calls and may face untimely procedural flags that stall drives. The Panthers have only had Shawn Smith officiate four home games since he became a head referee in 2018, and they are all losses. Date Opponent Result Score Nov 24, 2024 vs. Kansas City Chiefs Loss 27–30 Oct 9, 2022 vs. San Francisco 49ers Loss 15–37 Dec 12, 2021 vs. Atlanta Falcons Loss 21–29 Nov 25, 2018 vs. Seattle Seahawks Loss 27–30   Considering the how rare it is for Shawn Smith to officiate a Panthers game at all, this seems like an odd time to assign him to a Panthers game, unless the NFL wants to kill the Panthers season once and for all.  The Panthers' offensive line situation creates a "perfect storm" for referee Shawn Smith's specific tendency to call False Starts on the home team. The "Carousel" Factor (Communication Vulnerability) The most damning stat for the Panthers' offensive line in 2025 is their lack of continuity. The Stat: By Week 13, the Panthers had already fielded their 10th different offensive line combination. The Impact: False starts are often "communication penalties"—they happen when a guard doesn't hear the center's snap count or a tackle anticipates the wrong cadence. A unit that hasn't played together struggles with non-verbal communication. The Shawn Smith Multiplier: Shawn Smith’s crew calls False Starts at a high rate on home teams. He will likely look for flinches on the exterior of the line. A disjointed line that is constantly rotating players (due to the injuries of starters like Cade Mays and the illness issues with Robert Hunt earlier this season) is "fresh meat" for this specific referee bias. The Specific Culprits (2025 Penalties) Ikem Ekwonu (LT): Leads the team with 4 False Start penalties this season. He is the most frequent violator on the line. Taylor Moton (RT): Has been flagged for 3 False Starts. The Trap: Smith’s crew often focuses on the tackles (the players furthest from the ball) jumping early to get an edge on speed rushers. Since Ekwonu struggles with this discipline naturally, having a referee who hunts for it is a massive disadvantage. The "Managed Outcome" Synthesis The "Bucs Cover" Script: If the desired outcome is a Buccaneers win to solidify their playoff standing, the officials simply have to apply the letter of the law. Calling strict False Starts on a confused, banged-up Panthers O-line will consistently put them in "3rd and Long" situations, killing their drives and allowing the Bucs (-3.5) to cover easily. The "Close Game" Script: If the desired outcome is "Week 18 Drama" (keeping the division tied), look for the officials to ignore the Panthers' twitchy tackles. If Ekwonu jumps a split-second early and no flag is thrown, it effectively neutralizes the Bucs' pass rush, allowing the Panthers to keep the score close. Summary of the Edge Vulnerability: Extreme. The Panthers are playing backup interior linemen (like Jake Curhan or practice squad call-ups) next to jumpy tackles. Betting Implication: This strongly reinforces the Bucs -3 or -3.5 play. The combination of a "Road Team Referee" and a "Home Team O-Line in chaos" suggests the Panthers will beat themselves with procedural penalties. Based on the collision of the hard data (Referee bias + Offensive Line injuries) and the soft narratives ("Managed Outcomes"), here is the definitive recommendation. If you have to place a single Moneyline bet to win this game straight up: The Pick: Tampa Bay Buccaneers (-165) While the "Entertainment Script" hints at a Panthers upset to keep the division messy, the structural disadvantage the Panthers face in this specific matchup is too massive to ignore. Here is why the Buccaneers are the stong moneyline play: 1. The "Shawn Smith" Road-Field Advantage This is the decisive factor. In the NFL, Home Field Advantage usually accounts for about 1.5 to 2 points of value. The Reality: Referee Shawn Smith negates that advantage entirely. His crew calls penalties in a way that historically suppresses home crowd momentum (False Starts, holding). The Result: You are essentially getting the Buccaneers on a neutral field (or even a "pseudo-home" field) against a team with a worse roster. 2. The "Drive-Killer" Synergy To win as an underdog, the Panthers need to play a clean, mistake-free game to keep drives alive. The combination of Panthers' 10th O-Line combo + Jump-prone Tackles (Ekwonu) + A Referee who hunts False Starts is a recipe for disaster. The Scenario: Expect the Panthers to face multiple "1st and 15" or "3rd and 12" situations due to procedural flags. These drive-killers will force them to punt or settle for field goals, while the Bucs' offense (led by Mayfield) stays on schedule. 3. The "TV Product" Counter-Argument You asked about the "Managed Outcome." While a Panthers win creates "chaos," the NFL also values Star Power in the playoffs. Baker Mayfield and the Buccaneers are a proven national TV draw with recent playoff history. If the league has to choose between "Chaos" (Panthers) and "Ratings/Legitimacy" (Bucs), the "Script" likely leans toward ensuring the Buccaneers—the more marketable team—secure the division lead. They won't "fix" the game against the Panthers, but they won't intervene to save them from their own penalties. Final Verdict Betting on the Panthers requires you to hope for a miracle 4th-quarter collapse. Betting on the Buccaneers requires you to trust that a superior roster—aided by a favorable officiating crew—will control the game for the first 45 minutes. Take the Buccaneers Moneyline. The "Safe" money is on the Ref. The Prediction: Tampa Bay Buccaneers Win and Cover Projected Score: Buccaneers 27, Panthers 17 The Bet: Buccaneers -3 (or Moneyline -165) Confidence Level: High on the Winner; Moderate on the Spread (due to potential "garbage time" variance).
×
×
  • Create New...