Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Gettleman calls out Panthers draft strategy


panthersphan

Recommended Posts

3 hours ago, panthersphan said:

“With the second pick, we’re going to take the best player,” Gettleman told the team’s official website. “They screamed at me in Carolina, ‘You’ve got to draft a tackle, you’ve got to draft a tackle.’ If the value’s not there when you pick, you’re going to make a mistake. You’ll make a mistake. We’re going to set ourselves up so that we can take the best player available. And if the best player available is a quarterback, then that’s what we’re going to do.”

 

So Cargo Shorts blames everyone else at the organization for picking Vernon Butler?.....Kony Ealy? Shaq? triple dipping CBs in 2016? Does make you wonder that JR was pulling the strings I guess, but I'm ready to watch him pull some Gettlemagic with that #2 pick, BPA? If he doesn't take Fitzpatrick, Orlando Brown or Barkley over a QB here, I'll bump this thread and hand out pie to all! 

And we still dont have a tackle...go ahead gman work your draft magic...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Mr. Scot said:

To a degree, but more just saying you have to stick to your board and not reach for need no matter what people are saying.

I don't really think it's "calling out" anybody; just illustrating BPA philosophy.

 

Lol...3 corners bpa...talks a big game now

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I guess you need some time of strategy going into the draft and BPA is as good as anything else.  However, the experts (read: the men who get paid millions to make these selections) have proven that even with all of their tools it still involves a lot of luck.

Sometimes I think that the only reason first rounders work out, on average, better than 4th rounders is that a first rounder gets a lot more chances and snaps to be proven a bust than a 4th rounder.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

BPA only works if you adequately fill needs in free agency, and if you're actually picking the BPA.  

I actually don't think that that's what was done over the last several drafts.  

I think that because drafting Is such a crap shoot that you have to have margins of error as it pertains to want versus needs.  If players are close,  you go with the need.  If there's some generational or decidedly outstanding type of player at a position that falls,  then you draft him, period.  I've said all of this before (in another thread within the last month). 

Of course you have to take the overall make-up of your team into account,  so you can't keep on picking the same position over and over in the first and second rounds (unless you simply flopped the past years) because that continually neglects other areas of need,  unless you've adequately addressed the need in free agency.  If you do,  your weaknesses will become well-known and exploited year after year after year.  That's  what you don't  want. You want to stay as balanced as possible,  and upgrade whenever you get a chance. 

Again, that wasn't necessarily happening.  

One of the most important things IMO is that you have to have some flexibility and some adaptability on the fly---what I'll call situational drafting. It's not overrated.  You have to have a feel for what's going on. It applies to team building in general.  Situational team building!  That's where it's at! 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, Mr. Scot said:

Yep.

To illustrate reaching for need...

Let's say you go into a draft needing a tackle, and you're absolutely bound and determined to get one in the first round. It's a weak draft for tackles, but damn it we need one and we're gonna get one.

So your spot comes up. You look at your board and the best tackle currently available is a guy named Byron Bell.

As you're pondering this, someone mentions that there's a linebacker named Luke Kuechly available, and he's pretty good.

You acknowledge that Kuechly is good and all, but you don't need a linebacker because you already have Jon Beason.

So forget that. We're filling that need right now and taking Byron Bell. Best wishes to Luke Kuechly wherever he lands.

...

Think you might regret that decision a few years later?

That's what happens when you put need above best available.

lol... that's what happens when you look back...hindsight and all that rot.But I am glad G Man picked Luke instead of Bell...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Ravens mixing it up with a random Mark Andrew tush push last year isn't a similar situation.  Lamar has run QB sneaks his entire career.  And often instead of a traditional sneak will even employ a 4th and 1 direct snap to Lamar simply because of how athletic he is (which even Cam did a lot of) and let him pick his own holes.  
    • height being an issue doesn't just mean batted balls.  You could argue Bryce minimizes batted balls by adopting other poor habits such as his jump passing and leaving the pocket.   As I said, there are plays you can point to where he clearly was blind to parts of the field/players....which kills plays and opportunity. Which actually means some of the shorter/hot throws when things break down are where his vision gets blocked (and he had below average production all around the line of scrimmage).   has he figured it out? I mean, he improved off a trainwreck start.  But Bryce Young since arriving in the league (even while figuring it out)......doesn't generate much offensive production vs his peers.  I just think his ceiling is low.   And that's not in the grand scheme what you want in the NFL.  I think he can develop into a serviceable QB, that will largely always been a middle of the pack or low end starter.   
    • People make a lot of noise about his footwork and I think it is overblown. Whether he takes 3 steps backwards or 5 small steps doesn't matter as long as he ends up at the right depth and is in sync with  the receiver regarding timing. If he does that consistently who cares as long as he has a firm stable base as he delivers the ball. Which he does need to work on. However even that is somewhat overblown given that often QBs have to throw off balance or from different arm angles to fit the ball around defenders. He is considered very accurate so apparently it isn't hurting him that much.
×
×
  • Create New...