Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Lower concession prices...Higher profits?


Mr. Scot

Recommended Posts

I sent this exact feedback to "Spectrum Center" last time I went to an event there. Prices were so high on everything in the arena the we opted to only buy a drink each and just not partake in anything else. I'd have been fine spending money but there was no value in what we were purchasing and it was totally cost prohibitive. If they would lower prices we would have spent far more than we did and likely enjoyed ourselves more. Plus, if you get folks drinking the purse strings tend to loosen up a bit more. But at $10-15 per BEER we weren't enticed to purchase anything. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Snake said:

Yeah I never really understood the movie popcorn theory. The more affordable you make something the more people buy. 

There was an interesting segment on the show Brain Games about that one time. They had a showing of a movie one night and had only small and medium popcorn. The small was $3 and the large was something like $7. The first night almost everyone bought the small. Then the second night they added a large for $8. The second night almost everyone bought a large. That perceived value of the large over the medium effectively tricked people into thinking it was a value to pay $9 for something that would cost them less than a dollar to make at home.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, bigpoppa said:

There was an interesting segment on the show Brain Games about that one time. They had a showing of a movie one night and had only small and medium popcorn. The small was $3 and the large was something like $7. The first night almost everyone bought the small. Then the second night they added a large for $8. The second night almost everyone bought a large. That perceived value of the large over the medium effectively tricked people into thinking it was a value to pay $9 for something that would cost them less than a dollar to make at home.

Well yes playing on stupid people has always worked. Like. 99 instead of 1.00.

Still if you lower the total price each person buys something and doesn't share the total revenue goes up. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

49 minutes ago, RoaringRiot said:

Is this showing profits are higher or that people spent more money? Because they're different things. 

They looked at it from both sides.

Quote

One caution: Mimicking the Falcons’ concessions approach is not simply a matter of a team deciding to mark down prices. Blank and his staff did it by abandoning the traditional vendor structure and crafting an operator relationship that allowed the Falcons more control over prices.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

These places would rather make one slow nickel than five fast pennies. And honestly as long as it takes to get through the lines now, I can't imagine how bad it would be if half the attendees weren't refusing to participate in being fleeced. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I read that Pittsburgh is a possibility.  I think of college QB studs who had some form of mental quirk yet tons of talent--but their issue made being a team leader difficult and it led to their demise--going back:  Jamarcus Russell, Art Schlichter, Jeff George, etc. I think people forget that the QB must not only have talent, but they must lead.  
    • I wish I knew more details, but the NIL money to 20-year olds combined with easy access to gambling sites is a side effect that these kids may not have considered.  To your point,A famous 2009 Sports Illustrated article titled “How (and Why) Athletes Go Broke” estimated that 78% of retired NFL players go bankrupt or face significant financial stress within two years of leaving the league.  I am guessing that ego and $$$ and the thrill of competition (most pro athletes love competition because they are the winners) makes it a powerful temptation.  Throw in the ease of gambling on your phone which is always in your hand, and I see your point x 10.
    • Freeling got some reps at RT when they gave Moton a rest day--I sorta hope Freeling gets brought along slowly as you describe.  It would be better for him for reasons you provide.  We have a really good problem. 
×
×
  • Create New...