Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Lower concession prices...Higher profits?


Mr. Scot

Recommended Posts

I sent this exact feedback to "Spectrum Center" last time I went to an event there. Prices were so high on everything in the arena the we opted to only buy a drink each and just not partake in anything else. I'd have been fine spending money but there was no value in what we were purchasing and it was totally cost prohibitive. If they would lower prices we would have spent far more than we did and likely enjoyed ourselves more. Plus, if you get folks drinking the purse strings tend to loosen up a bit more. But at $10-15 per BEER we weren't enticed to purchase anything. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Snake said:

Yeah I never really understood the movie popcorn theory. The more affordable you make something the more people buy. 

There was an interesting segment on the show Brain Games about that one time. They had a showing of a movie one night and had only small and medium popcorn. The small was $3 and the large was something like $7. The first night almost everyone bought the small. Then the second night they added a large for $8. The second night almost everyone bought a large. That perceived value of the large over the medium effectively tricked people into thinking it was a value to pay $9 for something that would cost them less than a dollar to make at home.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, bigpoppa said:

There was an interesting segment on the show Brain Games about that one time. They had a showing of a movie one night and had only small and medium popcorn. The small was $3 and the large was something like $7. The first night almost everyone bought the small. Then the second night they added a large for $8. The second night almost everyone bought a large. That perceived value of the large over the medium effectively tricked people into thinking it was a value to pay $9 for something that would cost them less than a dollar to make at home.

Well yes playing on stupid people has always worked. Like. 99 instead of 1.00.

Still if you lower the total price each person buys something and doesn't share the total revenue goes up. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

49 minutes ago, RoaringRiot said:

Is this showing profits are higher or that people spent more money? Because they're different things. 

They looked at it from both sides.

Quote

One caution: Mimicking the Falcons’ concessions approach is not simply a matter of a team deciding to mark down prices. Blank and his staff did it by abandoning the traditional vendor structure and crafting an operator relationship that allowed the Falcons more control over prices.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

These places would rather make one slow nickel than five fast pennies. And honestly as long as it takes to get through the lines now, I can't imagine how bad it would be if half the attendees weren't refusing to participate in being fleeced. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • with arm strength people often get stuck on the distance  arm strength in the NFL is moreso measured in speed / velocity .which of course is how long does it take for  the ball to travel from the time of release until it reaches its target ? & u beat world class speed with more speed on the ball...just saying  
    • No GM hits 100%. I'm well aware. But what a GM has to do is look at the roster, what's available, and future contracts and go from there. XL was a one season wonder in college. He has speed. Who cares. He body catches and his hands are bricks. Speed doesn't matter when you don't actually have the ball. There were other receivers available with better resumes. XL was a project. Fitts loved projects. You don't have the luxury of projects when you just traded away DJ for a QB. 1st round WRs need to contribute now.  Brooks was a luxury RB pick we didn't have the luxury to make. Who cares if Dallas was going to pick him. We had holes all over our defense. Chuba was coming off a fresh contract. We just inked 150m interior line and then centered it by moving a guard to center that had suffered 2 season ending injuries. The most critical area on our line was being held together by a bandaid and a prayer. No surprise when it didn't work.   Wallace is getting better but Wilson was sitting there waiting to be taken. DPOY for college football right there for the taking. That was a gimme pick. If you're going to take a risk on an injured player, the 3rd round for Wilson made a whole lot more sense at a position we were rest stop TP thin at.  4th round and on aren't going to be heavy contributors unless you're lucky.  He did well on the trade for Jackson. Coker, I believe he offered the largest guarantee. He actually got more than some late round picks make.  Those 1st 3 picks, IMO, were straight up whiffs.  Looking back at Fitterer's picks, I think he tried to plug holes because we had a ton of them. Problem was, he wasn't very good at it and he loved RAS scores and developmental players with a coach that couldn't develop a Polaroid. He tried to do too much. He was impatient. His other problem was he panicked during the draft and couldn't read or understand the flow of how drafts tend to go. DJ Johnson was the prime example. We needed an edge rusher and he jumped in at the end of the run instead of starting it.  Morgan's first year looked exactly like Fitts to me. Lots of projects.  2nd year looks better.  We'll see how 3rd year goes. FA also plays into all of this as well but that's a whole different topic of how it played out and planning with regard to drafting. 
    • I judge how good our players are by the way a defense covers them. XL draws no special coverage. Coker on the other hand always has a man over the top. It still doesn’t matter. You be the judge.
×
×
  • Create New...