Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Possible GM Candidates


Mr. Scot

Recommended Posts

Tina Becker being in on it is likely just a rubber stamp for Richardson.

If Ron Rivera is part of it, and I expect he will be, we know from his own words that he'll favor Hurney (and it's not like Rivera makes the greatest decisions when it comes to hiring people anyway).

I'd take the process a lot more seriously if it involved someone from outside the organization, but that's not likely.

I'm hopeful that an actual qualified candidate is selected, but I can't help feeling like this is all just a show and we'll wind up with Hurney in the end.

Prove me wrong, Panthers.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, Mr. Scot said:

While I still think the process is going to be rigged for Marty Hurney, this is at least potentially good news.

 

I thought so too.  I am not buying the Marty 2.0 crap.  It was my opinion  that he started mortgaging the future to save his job before getting canned---that is a character issue.  Secondly, he always drafted a safe pick in the first round. Finally, there were positions he would ignore or suck at drafting--like DT, WR (Jarrett, Colbert, etc) , and I don't recall many DBs that made me squirm with outright joy.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

43 minutes ago, top dawg said:

Hurney probably ain't going to make the cut, guys.  It appears that "interim" really meant interim. 

The only way I see this being the case is if new ownership is already basically decided upon behind the scenes and is giving their okay on this search. If not, I have to think there's a really good chance that new ownership will bounce whoever and put the people of their choosing in place.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, LinvilleGorge said:

The only way I see this being the case is if new ownership is already basically decided upon behind the scenes and is giving their okay on this search. If not, I have to think there's a really good chance that new ownership will bounce whoever and put the people of their choosing in place.

This whole thing is looking more and more like it's a last ditch effort to go all in to get a title for JR and his cronies.  The only reason they are doing this at all is because by rule they have to.  The panel will in the end select Hurney.

Then Hurney will have free reign to do whatever it takes to make sure they win it all with the next two years.  Cap be damned. 

I would bet my left nut that old Jerry has already set this up with the next owner.  Except for wrecking the cap part that is, the new owner will find that out later.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I'm impressed with the way Tillis is structuring the books. The team is currently spending more on non-premium positions like iOL and S, but that’s because they’ve got rookie deals locked in at several key premium spots: QB: Bryce Young LT: Ikem Ekwonu EDGE: Nic Scourton, Princely Umanmielen WR: Tetairoa McMillan, Xavier Legette, Jalen Coker The only veterans at those premium positions on second contracts are Taylor Moton, Adam Thielen, and the recently extended Jaycee Horn. Given that setup, it makes sense to allocate bigger dollars toward non-premium roles - especially if those pieces support the development and success of the younger core. Investing in iOL helps our young QB. Strengthening the DL helps both of our young EDGE guys and our high-paid CB. I can see the vision. Fingers crossed that it works!
    • I don’t know why the tanking concept is not understood. Coaches and players are not involved at all. It’s always the front office. If we had actually traded players like we should have back in 2022, we would have effectively tanked and gotten a better pick than 9 so we lost all the draft picks to get Young. We traded CMC. We should have traded Burns for the haul and taken GB’s offer of a 1st for Moore. We could have easily traded anyone else. We see it in every sport, every year. Trade deadlines where bad teams give up current assets for future assets. Unfortunately, we were stupid and decided we only wanted to trade CMC for peanuts even though we clearly had a plan to go after Young. We were dumb and there is no way you can tell me that we shouldn’t have tanked via trading away Burns, Moore and anyone else. We’d be a much better team right now had we had a fire sale and tanked the 2022 season. Trading away your top players for future draft picks or prospects (baseball) is tanking. Shoeless Joe and the black Sox is not tanking. That’s point shaving/betting on your sport/team. Again, I just don’t get why this concept is so hard to get when MLB, NFL and NBA teams trade players for future assets every single year and usually end up with better draft slots (or at least odds since Hornets never win the lottery).
×
×
  • Create New...