Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Malcolm Butler's response to his benching


Mr. Scot

Recommended Posts

48 minutes ago, Wyank said:

If he was benched for the Super Bowl over breaking a team rule, I doubt he would want to go to a team that benches their franchise QB over not wearing a tie.

Id flip out if we got Malcom Butler and drafted a good saftey . Our secondary was a horrible problem last season. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 minutes ago, NanuqoftheNorth said:

Without more information as to what Belichick was thinking...

There's something i wouldn't hold my breath waiting on.

6 minutes ago, thefuzz said:

This may sound weird, but maybe he did stay out too late, and got popped with weed....what if BB is trying to cover that up so it won't hurt his upcoming free agency?

Now, I'm not one to think that BB would do anything nice for anyone, but that could be an explanation.  (not that I think it's a real possibility)

Butler's reaction doesn't really lend to that.

And honestly, it seems like Belichick hasn't been Butler's biggest fan for a while now.  Remember when it was all but a done deal that he was getting traded to the Saints?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just an absolutely baffling decision by Belichick. Anyone not already wearing 5 rings would be hearing calls for his head over that one. Evidently making a last minute decision to bench a starting CB then proceed to give up nearly 400 yards and 3 TDs to a backup QB to lose the Super Bowl. Yikes.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 hours ago, Mr. Scot said:

From what I've seen of his ego, I'd be willing to bet Belichick believes he could win a Super Bowl with 53 high schoolers.

This isn't the first time he's outsmarted himself.

Today, Felger & Mazz, on cable TV from Boston, are really laying into BB & his giant ego because of the benching.

They pointed out that Butler played one snap --on special teams.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yep, when you make a last minute decision like that and it blows up in your face you deserve all the criticism that you're gonna catch over it. 

That's the way it goes for coaches. You're a genius when decisions go your way, you're an idiot when they don't. So it has always been, so it will always be.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Mr. Scot said:

From the whispers I've read, it sounds like some of his teammates think it could have.

A few different journalists have pointed out that Butler basically played every single defensive snap this season, including in the playoffs.  He was also getting the majority of the reps this week in practice.

Maybe BB has been reading his own press to much, and overthinking things.  IMO, you go with the horse that got you there instead of taking a risk.  Had Butler played, they might have lost anyway, but one thing is for certain.  They did lose without him playing, and their secondary got shredded.  In fact, it was their worst performance of the year, even worse than when they allowed ED and KB to run uncovered thru their secondary

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, Davidson Deac II said:

Maybe BB has been reading his own press to much, and overthinking things.  IMO, you go with the horse that got you there instead of taking a risk.  Had Butler played, they might have lost anyway, but one thing is for certain.  They did lose without him playing, and their secondary got shredded.  In fact, it was their worst performance of the year, even worse than when they allowed ED and KB to run uncovered thru their secondary

Some bold moves make sense...like Saban benching his QB at the half...some don't, like this one.  Just a strange situation all around.

 

BB had to be thinking that Butler was leaving via FA, and was going to show him he wasn't needed for them to win or something...that's the only thing that makes any sense.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Still makes no sense. If it was for performance typically he would have found that out during the week leading to the superbowl as you build your game plan. Something isn't right about this but we may not find out until Butler signs with his new team, and trust me he will have a new team, no way he stays after this.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

26 minutes ago, Clicheking said:

Still makes no sense. If it was for performance typically he would have found that out during the week leading to the superbowl as you build your game plan. Something isn't right about this but we may not find out until Butler signs with his new team, and trust me he will have a new team, no way he stays after this.

Panthers ?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • The only thing I said was he was part of the staff that made part of the decisions, and that I am judging the decisions made by that group as a whole. As assistant GM, you can pretty much guarantee his input held more sway than an intern or the guy that takes coffee requests. Fitterer didn't operate in a vacuum. Neither does Morgan now. While Fitterer did have the ultimate decision, to say that Dan had no input in ranking boards, evaluating FAs, trade offers or anything else would be asinine. We all know he did. Otherwise what the hell was his job as assistant GM? He wouldn't have been kept for 3 years if he was arguing every decision Scott ever made.    And the actual quote was "Morgan has done a bang up job in the draft and FA. Compared to what the last guy did, he is kicking ass and taking names." So is XL kicking ass and Brooks taking names from last years draft or did I get it backwards? We took Wallace over Payton Wilson because he was an injury risk after trading up for a RB with a torn ACL? Which one of the kicking ass and taking names was that?  Maybe we should review the thousands of gameday posts calling for XL to get off the field because he's a bust and can't catch a cold. We could review the posts about Brooks but... And Wilson. He's at 118 tackles this season vs 36 for Wallace.  I gave credit to Dan for a good draft this year. But I'm also not ignoring last year's draft either since he did that one after the last guy too.  That's not a strawman. 
    • And then, in week 18, we can take Mayfield out of the game and whoop Bridgewater's @$$ for good measure! Let the former QB revenge train roll on!!
    • If we keep our guards in tact ($$$) and go with Mays at C, some OT depth would be nice. I think we should be happy about CB with Thornton's development (pre injury) and Smith Wade. I think Ransom is developing nicely, but I would like to see a FS type for situations. We suck at ILB and Edge (as a whole). We should be OK at RB.  I hope we sign Dowdle to a short contract. QB?  There are signs of hope and development.  (I don't like our backup QB) TE?  Good draft for TE, but I think we are developing with Evans, Sanders, and Tremble. WR?  A #2 with Coker and Horn in the slot.  XL?  What is that? We should be good in 2026. Morgan does more than draft.  Free agency has been strong too.  (Just emptying my brain on your comment--sorry)
×
×
  • Create New...