Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Here is the "need index" for QB, RB, WR, and TE.


JakeDel5674

Recommended Posts

7 minutes ago, JakeDel5674 said:

Hard to argue with RB & WR, and might need to start looking at the future for the TE position. 

Good find. 

I like the TE from Stanford--Dalton Shultz for us. I would also take Notre Dame TE Durham Smythe.  Both are probably 5th/6th rounders (guessing). The others are overrated and/or 1 dimensional.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Give me Geisicki, Fumagalli, or Shultz. Depending on who's there at 24, I'd go with Andrews or Goedert too. I think adding a WR in free agency and tight end in the draft makes more sense than spending an early draft pick on a WR. 

We know Cam performs better with two tight end sets and also that Turner will incorporate that in to his gameplan more. Cam needs weapons, and we will need at least one RB, WR and TE to complete this offense.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Soul Rebel said:

Give me Geisicki, Fumagalli, or Shultz. Depending on who's there at 24, I'd go with Andrews or Goedert too. I think adding a WR in free agency and tight end in the draft makes more sense than spending an early draft pick on a WR. 

We know Cam performs better with two tight end sets and also that Turner will incorporate that in to his gameplan more. Cam needs weapons, and we will need at least one RB, WR and TE to complete this offense.

 

Fumagalli is a beast.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Basically agree.  He is the one of that bunch that offers upgraded pass catching along with he is supposed to be kind of special.   Then you have the OL and the ideas that if they perform you can have JAG backs and still do well. So okay we could be fine.  But Brooks is important and to me that receiving element sets him apart.  So there sure is something riding on him.     What strikes me as incongruent is people over in Atlanta or those that follow them look at Penix with a third surgery and act like it is no big deal.      And we are on pins and needles over Brooks.  Either they should worry a lot more or we should worry a lot less.  
    • I usually go a game or two optimist over the consensus here but this is too early for me to say. I need to see some players on the field.  I am not feeling real optimistic though.  
    • Okay as a ‘take CJ’ fan I actually don’t obsess over CJ and Houston, contrary to the narrative.  But I thought I picked up some noise that his OL left a lot to be desired.    Not a single Beyce supporter would judge him harshly if he had a crappy OL. We all know that.    So be fair about it.  A QB needs to be protected.  Especially a guy that gets to his spot and wants to finish the play from there. Which CJ is.  
×
×
  • Create New...