Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

While we are at it.. Mike Mitchell?


imminent rogaine

Recommended Posts

There is speculation from various sources that Mike Mitchell could be on his way out of Pittsburgh. 

http://www.post-gazette.com/sports/steelers/2018/02/15/mike-mitchell-contract-sean-davis-safeties-tom-bradley/stories/201802150130

He would certainly not have a big price tag.

Would you take him over Coleman? 

Bringing back Norman and Mitchell would give our defense a huge boost of nasty. 

 

@Ace_Aladdin

 

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hVl4v9v13oU

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Steelers save 6.5 million by cutting him...yeah he gone.

Would like to bring him back, and the price wouldn't be high...but how much does he have left?  A legit question because outside of his (sometimes dirty) hits, not sure how much of an upgrade he would be over (hopefully) a draft pick.

 

 

Side note, we signed Mitchell for 1 year, 1 million dollars back in 13. I miss contracts like that. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

18 minutes ago, LinvilleGorge said:

Mitchell should come relatively cheap and he's six years younger than Mike Adams. Yeah, another stopgap. But probably a better stopgap than we currently have.

I agree.. I can't stand the hypocrite clown .. Who had no problem with one person bargain shopping vets but does now...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, LinvilleGorge said:

Yes. Absolutely.

He's not only an upgrade over our current safeties, but he'd bring some swagger back to our secondary as well.

Have you seen him play the last two years? Dude is slow and takes bad angles. He does draw good unsportsmanlike penalties though. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Smith-Wade for me. He has the path to some decent hefty snaps in Evero’s scheme. He held his own last year and improved as he continued to get snaps— If he makes some strides, could be a very capable nickel.  I agree with Sanders. Bryce had some trust in him that final Falcons game post crazy head-stand.  Bryce looked for him a lot that final game and made some critical catches to get us the W. Seems he’s put in major work so I’m hopeful about him.  Wallace will have an offseason under his belt. I like him a lot, was higher graded than most remember in his draft (I.e Brugler had him LB3/70 overall) but he isn’t as cerebral of an LB as we’re used to. I think he could thrive if we get D captain/film-junky type next to him— because right now that’s Jewell.  Still a bit cautious but love the talent. Rozeboom may snag some playing time from him if he’s still working out the kinks.
    • Didnt Canales already say starters are playing in the pre season? either way extra reps dont hurt but im not one of those people that think playing in the pre season would have saved Bryce from an awful start.
    • very helpful.  I read back in this thread where they might try Jarvis at C--I thought he and Aho had good chemistry, however.  Nonetheless, he could expand his value there, and now we have a guy who can play jarvis' spot.  Freddie is a pro, no doubt--and as little as I know about the inner workings of strategy and positions, I could tell Burns was burning us at times.  I figured he'd retire and I was looking forward to it.  FWIW, they have Jarvis listed as a C on the 2025-26 roster.
×
×
  • Create New...