Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Speaking of failed physicals..


Mr. Scot

Recommended Posts

2 minutes ago, steven8989 said:

Yeah NFL should look into that, I think that is dirty to do a player like that. Totally different than our situation, Breeland and his agent tried to keep his injury silent and that's bs.

It seems to me that it was more like Breeland didn't think the injury was a problem at all not anything nefarious. He was certainly wrong but I don't blame him for us getting screwed over. Just an unfortunate situation.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, PantherCam213 said:

He knew he had an injury and stalled getting here to have it checked out,  Why delay if he didn't think it was a concern?

This. I thought it was weird that he didn't show to sign on Wednesday but I didn't think much into it. But based on what happened yesterday, I think he was 100% stalling.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yall are funny. Nothing will happen and there aren't any rules related to this anyway. This happens all the time plus there is no NFL wide physical standard. Teams pass people all the time who aren't actually healthy and fail other players based off previous injuries or any number of things if they think the future could be compromised. 

If you have had surgeries or even just minor injuries even within a year the effects will still be visible and most players could fail any scrutinized to the fullest physical just based on future "scares" because they are all fuged up under the microscope. Literally 0 that could be done to the Ravens. Dood was injured in week 15 and again in 17 so there is absolutely something to see on a scan at this point. Once again just because he passed a physical or 10 elsewhere doesn't mean anything and it never has.

Hell there could be a player who is flat footed and played 10 years injury free and go try to sign with another team and get failed because of that even if that is the only thing wrong with em.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I dont think the Ravens will see any repercussions from this, but I do absolutely think that Crabtree's sudden availability played a huge role in him "failing" his physical.

They had reached a 4 year/$29M agreement with grant with $14.5M guaranteed. They signed Crabtree to a 3 year/$21M deal with $11M guaranteed. I bet that contract looks virtually identical to the first three years of the Grant contract. They probably pretty much took Grant's deal and translated it into a 3 year deal for Crabtree due to his age.

If Crabtree didn't get cut I'd bet just about anything that Grant is a Raven.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • The question is which Bryce shows up game 1. Do we get week 2 (2024) Bryce, or week 18 (2024) Bryce?  I will say that his progression after the benching last year was amazing. He literally got better every game - sans Dallas. Like every week he did something we hadn't seen him do before. And it wasn't luck, toss it up for grabs plays like Penix did against Carolina. Penix was just throwing the ball as hard as he could in the direction of a receiver and hoping they'd make a play for him. What we saw from Bryce was different. Decision making, reading defenses, recognizing blitzes and where they were coming from, knowing his hot, avoiding pressure and manipulating the pocket, throwing with anticipation, taking shots downfield, and running the ball surprisingly well. Stats don't always tell the story. Did he miss some throws that he should have made - sure did. But the clutch gene is strong with this one. One score game and Carolina has the ball with 2 minutes on the clock - I'm confident he'll give them a chance to win more than he doesn't. 
    • I really like David Moore. He's a reliable WR. Smart, doesn't drop the ball and he's where he's supposed to be. Now, he ain't gonna route up a DB. He ain't gonna 50/50 ball a DB. He ain't gonna run by a DB either. But he runs a good enough route and catches the ball - definitely an NFL average WR. Every team could use a David Moore. Now if this receiving group can force Dan and Dave to let him go, then this team has come a long way since 2023. A LONG way. But I will say that Horn's speed is a big deal. They don't really have another guy with speed and quickness to blow the top off the defense and make guys miss in space after the catch, though he is still a rookie and hasn't done it in the NFL. If he and Renfrow push Moore out, then we might actually have something gents. Plus I see Renfrow as Thielen's replacement in 2026. I just don't think Coker is the reliable, move the chains guy like Thielen. Could be wrong. 
    • david newton still doesn't have a clue. how long has he been doing this?
×
×
  • Create New...