Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Dez Bryant


ncfan

Dez Bryant  

122 members have voted

  1. 1. Do you pick him up?

    • Yes
      35
    • No
      89


Recommended Posts

Just now, Leeroy Jenkins Ph.D. said:

Would he make the team better? Of course.

Can we afford him? Nope.

He's being cut by Dallas so we dont pick up his current one.  He's older and not going to get Allen Robinson/Wakins money.  You cut Shepard (another WR) and open just enough space for a vet chasing a ring

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, ncfan said:

He's being cut by Dallas so we dont pick up his current one.  He's older and not going to get Allen Robinson/Wakins money.  You cut Shepard (another WR) and open just enough space for a vet chasing a ring

poo, Dez doesn't care about a ring. Even if he's cut he'll be too expensive for his production 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 minutes ago, jasonluckydog said:

No matter where he goes he will be bringing his best he will want to prove Dallas messed up by not getting him. Revenge game every game

Take him away from Jerry Reality Show Jones. 

Playing with a chip on his shoulder, playing with Cam.  

Win for us

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, Cpt slay a ho said:

Like rod Woodson stated, he’s a little late in his career to be working on his routes etc, he’s lost a step, wouldn’t be any better than kB at this point. 3 route specialist, fade, slant and hitch 

I'm glad some can see he's a bigger ego shorter version of KB at this point 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • lol, that second part is quite literally one of the dumbest things ever. Having or not having guaranteed contracts has absolutely nothing to do with how much these billionaires have to pay.  Because there is a hard cap and a minimum cap spend requirement, and teams either use their cap or roll it over to use it all the next year, so the owners have to pay the same amount of money in the end no matter what. Having fully guaranteed contracts in the NFL would only hurt salary cap management, and thus would end up screwing over the team and its fan base when teams kiss on signings as they take up cap room that is needed to improve the roster. Look at the Browns with Watson, they gave him the fully guaranteed deal and all it’s doing is sucking up massive cap space now.  If they hadn’t done that, the owner would still be paying the same amount of money each year as that cap space would still be used elsewhere. If you want to argue for fully guaranteed contracts because the players deserve it, that’s an entirely different argument and a fair one to discuss.  But anyone against fully guaranteed deals isn’t doing it to argue for the billionaire owners.
    • Start posting in threads in the other forums instead of just creating threads. No one comes over here so you aren't starting conversations.  Get your ass up to 100 posts. It's not that hard. Don't create 100 posts. Contribute to conversations. 
    • Ryabkin could be the steal of the draft, he was a Top 10 pick heading into last season and had a rough year.  Lots of GMs passed on him because of that and his workouts. Pick has really high upside and Svech should be able to translate Rod tearing his arse a new one for making dumb plays since Svech has had several years of it.  🤣😂
×
×
  • Create New...