Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

How would you feel if we draft a WR , RB, or TE with pick 24?


Pantha-kun

Who would you take in senario below?   

79 members have voted

  1. 1. Which player

    • Calvin Ridley, WR , Alabama
      24
    • DJ Moore, WR , Maryland
      30
    • Christian Kirk, WR , Texas A&M
      2
    • Darrius Guice, RB, LSU
      3
    • Other RB
      0
    • Oline
      1
    • Dline
      1
    • DB
      14
    • TE
      4


Recommended Posts

Lets just say that we didnt trade up in this senario. In a somewhat surprising move, the Ravens pick up Courtland Sutton instead of Ridley . Most of the picks in front of us are crazy trade ups for  QBs, Darnold, Rosen , Allen, Mayfield , Jackson , and Rudolph all go before us , and other teams picking up the prime defensive talent pushes alot of top offensive prospects down to us. 

So imagine we are sitting at 24 with say almost all the WRS ( Ridley, Moore, Kirk ) , all the RBs not named Barkley , and no TEs have been drafted.  Would you be okay with drafting one of those 3 , a RB, or a TE?  

I think Id be perfect. Use our first pick for offense and go defense for most of the rest of the draft . For example , players available in the most recent sim I did : 

Offense : 

  • DJ Moore , Calvin Ridley, Christian Kirk, 
  • Darrius Guice, Ronald Jones, Sony Michel
  • Gesicki, Andrews, Goedert, Hurst
  • Connor William, Billy Price, Will Hernandez

Defense: 

  • Marcus Davenport, Josh Sweat , Sam Hubbard
  • Josh Jackson , Carlton Davis, Mike Huges
  • Ronnie Harrison, Jessie Bates , Marcus Allen

I think in a situation like this, the offensive talent is tipping the scales massively. I dont see any defensive players worthy of R1 besides maybe Davenport, and I'm leery of the DEs in this draft not named Bradley Chubb. I'd select Ridley here. 

In this senario I would take Ridley. What would you do? Would you feel comfortable with offense pick in general? Or would you reach for defense b/c our secondary is so bad? Im thinking we could also massively gut some team trying to trade up for Ridley or Moore in this senario. 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

as long as Rivera is our coach, our best chance at winning it all is to have a stellar year on defense.  I trust Cam and Norv can keep the offense afloat this season.  I would love to see us put together a secondary to compliment the front seven for once.  I would take the best DB available.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yeah I'm saying Moore all the way, just looks like the kind of receiver we are missing...have CMC and it's not like Cap has been given enough reps to know what we have in him...can take a rb I just wouldn't do it before round 3..tight end..if the receivers/secondary we like are gone I'd be ok with it...it's not like we haven't lost games because Dickson had a tendency (obviously couple exceptions) to not catch wide open touchdowns/first downs

Link to comment
Share on other sites

57 minutes ago, Pantha-kun said:

Lets just say that we didnt trade up in this senario. In a somewhat surprising move, the Ravens pick up Courtland Sutton instead of Ridley . Most of the picks in front of us are crazy trade ups for  QBs, Darnold, Rosen , Allen, Mayfield , Jackson , and Rudolph all go before us , and other teams picking up the prime defensive talent pushes alot of top offensive prospects down to us. 

So imagine we are sitting at 24 with say almost all the WRS ( Ridley, Moore, Kirk ) , all the RBs not named Barkley , and no TEs have been drafted.  Would you be okay with drafting one of those 3 , a RB, or a TE?  

I think Id be perfect. Use our first pick for offense and go defense for most of the rest of the draft . For example , players available in the most recent sim I did : 

Offense : 

  • DJ Moore , Calvin Ridley, Christian Kirk, 
  • Darrius Guice, Ronald Jones, Sony Michel
  • Gesicki, Andrews, Goedert, Hurst
  • Connor William, Billy Price, Will Hernandez

Defense: 

  • Marcus Davenport, Josh Sweat , Sam Hubbard
  • Josh Jackson , Carlton Davis, Mike Huges
  • Ronnie Harrison, Jessie Bates , Marcus Allen

I think in a situation like this, the offensive talent is tipping the scales massively. I dont see any defensive players worthy of R1 besides maybe Davenport, and I'm leery of the DEs in this draft not named Bradley Chubb. I'd select Ridley here. 

In this senario I would take Ridley. What would you do? Would you feel comfortable with offense pick in general? Or would you reach for defense b/c our secondary is so bad? Im thinking we could also massively gut some team trying to trade up for Ridley or Moore in this senario. 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • He’s overthrown WRs numerous times deep,I don’t think his arm strength there is a problem, def seems to be and issue in the 20-30 yard range, I don’t see a lot of outbreaking routes being completed, whether that’s due to his lack of ability to drive the ball to the outside hash or our WRs, especially XL cornering at the top of there routes. regardless of his weaknesses, the question is can a team be built around him to mask them, or can he overcome those weaknesses and adapt. I know it’s beating a dead horse, but something big is missing from Bryce’s qb play that’s leading to so many sub 200 yard passing games, all signs lead to a physical trait that’s the cause of this, wether it’s arm strength or his height  
    • That was fully intentional, because something people who engage in hyperbole can't stand is to be systematically told why and how they don't have a clue. It's the prevalence of this farcical idea that everyone's opinions are valid and the more impassioned they are about them, the more valid they are. And the point of the post wasn't merely to cut the knees of the exaggerators, but to illustrate why it shouldn't seem miraculous that someone like Mayfield and Darnold could come through Charlotte and fail and then suddenly seem much more successful elsewhere, when the reality is that there's far more to being successful at that position than one's own talent. It's also why young quarterbacks like Caleb Williams and Cam Ward deserve much longer leashes to determine their long-term viability and not be written off immediately, because the circumstances surrounding them are hardly conducive to success.
    • I think at some point you top out what God gave you.  He can use leverage via his mechanics to maximize what he has and When he pays attention to it the throws are better.    IMO as a layman a lot of it is what kind of ‘headroom’ you have. The guys who are gifted don’t have to use maximum effort to get good results and stay within themselves but they have it in reserve. They can do an arm throw for substantial distance without max effort.    I think what we may be seeing with these ‘lasers’ is a throw that Bryce puts the max effort into and does his mechanics right and has his base right and it works together.    To get to the payoff here, I think his best velocity throws take dall that whereas  a naturally gifted guy doesn’t need to go full effort to get that same velocity. I have said this three or four times over the years and it never gets picked up on but the accuracy is more consistent with an easier motion and max effort can produce less predictable location. It is a baseball pitcher thing but it applies to throwing a pass too. It isn’t that you can’t make an accurate throw with full effort it is just not as reliably accurate to the same degree. Someone said something about his pro day and that is where I saw it too. He took a little extra step on the deep throws. Some call it a hitch but I don’t see it that way because I don’t see it on shorter throws. He does it trying to get distance. I saw that and just wanted no part of it at 1.1 . That is not tne characteristic of a 1.1 passer.  He should have been at best, late first  I had him second day. Of course I am no one and certainly not a pro evaluator, it is just that he was so easy to suss out. It is kind of in your face obvious.  They must have thought they could fix him. Changing a lifelong throwing motion with the footwork tied into it is not fuging easy. Anyone that had decent success with ‘their’ way and tried to change it to get more, can tell you that.     
×
×
  • Create New...