Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Defensive versatility emerging as a theme


MHS831

Recommended Posts

10 hours ago, AU-panther said:

What is wrong with a CB that is relatively fast (4.4) and tall 6'0"?  What are we going to do? Have different starting CBs depending on who we are playing?  How many teams do that?  I'm sure the players and their agents will love that.

 

Sometimes it feels like we outsmart ourselves.  Cam throws high, lets get tall receivers.  Cam's receivers can't separate, lets draft really fast ones.  Our corners are big and slow.  Lets find some really fast ones that happen to be small.  

The Shaq draft still bugs me.  I think the has the potential to be a good player but we basically drafted him to be a backup in the first round.  He will become a starter once he is expensive.  We could have just signed him as a free agent.

If we used a 2nd round pick on a slot CB so be it.  I can make the argument that your slot is probably more important them a lot of your traditional 22 starters.  I just don't buy this versatility idea they are claiming.  Maybe he becomes our starting outside corner, its not like Revis was much taller.

Good points--It seems that the presser after the draft is to sell the player to the fans--maybe rightly so--but they do get idealistic.   I am curious about the 2 LBs and how and where they fit in.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Playing in our division means you need a secondary that can play the run and the pass. When you play cover 3 on one play, come back and play cover 2 on the next play and cover 0 the next, should we really be talking about corners and safeties as if they were totally different positions with clear differentiated responsibilities. We value flexibility and athleticism with a competitive attitude and swagger. I like what we are doing and think there is not only where the NFL is going but what our teams needs at this point. I can't wait to see what this staff can do with these guys.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Can’t get excited about the Curtis Samuel pick because of his versatility a year ago and then hate picks this year because they are versatile.

BTW just because the coaches say players have skill set to play multiple positions doesn’t mean they will. As matter of a fact they rarely ask anyone to play more than 1 position.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It’s the same sh!t on offense too.

Samuel, McCaffery and now Moore were all drafted because of their ability to line up in different spots. 

They said they took Moore over Ridley because he brought more to the table like the ability to return. Well, didn’t we just f’n draft those other two because of the same reasons?! 

At some freaking point you need guys that can actually play the position and quit sacrificing skill for versatility. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

One of the draft guys was in an interview prior to Thursday (Tony Pauline, I think)  and said he thought the Panthers might pass on Will Hernandez because he's really only good at one thing.

The counter of course, is that Will Hernandez is very good at that one thing.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 hours ago, Growl said:

"emerging" lol

the panthers have been allowing players who can play one position well to pass them by in favor of guys who play a bunch of positions poorly throughout Rivera's entire tenure

This is exactly what I was thinking for the entire draft after DJ Moore. More of the same poo. I knew it would just continue when we skipped on Justin Reid in the 2nd, which alot of people were projected us to take in the 1st round lol.

Nothings going to change unless Rivera and Hurney get fired. 

I mean, I'd love to be suprised and for all these guys to work out. But bringing in about 20 different nickle CBs since Norman left and trying to play them everywhere on the field hasnt been working going on 2+ years. 

They say doing the same thing over and over again and expecting different results, is the definition of insanity. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 hours ago, panther4life said:

Can’t get excited about the Curtis Samuel pick because of his versatility a year ago and then hate picks this year because they are versatile.

BTW just because the coaches say players have skill set to play multiple positions doesn’t mean they will. As matter of a fact they rarely ask anyone to play more than 1 position.

But the same position can have different responsibilities on different plays requiring different skill sets. The whole versatility complaints makes little sense to me. That is like saying you didn't like Magic Johnson because he was so versatile and could literally play all five positions including center. I don't agree that versatile means you are giving up quality because of flexibility. Seems to me that to be versatile you have to be athletic and fit well into the team's scheme and philosophy. Why wouldn't you want versatility and flexibility. Gaulden for example is an NFL caliber nickel corner but will be a dynamic safety in our scheme. Playing close in the line in running situations and in cover 2 in clear passing situations. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

23 hours ago, MHS831 said:

We draft D. Jackson who is told he will play nickel and outside, depending on matchups.  Rivera said Bradberry will be used against the bigger WRs, etc.   Jackson is going to take away the other team's speed advantage.  Period.  He is good enough to play outside, inside, etc. but we went after him hard because he has a versatile skill set.

Then we draft Gaulden, who is told he might play CB, nickel, and S.  While I think he is a safety, and maybe they say that so the veterans don't feel threatened, he will be on the field a lot. 

Then we draft Haynes (DE...or is he?) called a DE by Rivera at the presser but he mentioned the Joker position and suggested that he is able to cover TEs in the seam--like a LB.  Personally, I think Haynes is basically going to play the Sam some, DE some, and I think we will stunt him to the QB a lot. 

Get a traditional 4-3 out of your heads.  This defense is going to hunt.  

 

Exactly we are putting in a lot of those Seattle / Jaguars concepts with hybrid schemes. Watch for man/zone coverage also with Jackson following the fastest and the others filling in zone with the others. 

Jokers are wild,... says Riverboat Ron,..

key the kenny Rogers fellas.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

23 hours ago, MHS831 said:

We draft D. Jackson who is told he will play nickel and outside, depending on matchups.  Rivera said Bradberry will be used against the bigger WRs, etc.   Jackson is going to take away the other team's speed advantage.  Period.  He is good enough to play outside, inside, etc. but we went after him hard because he has a versatile skill set.

Then we draft Gaulden, who is told he might play CB, nickel, and S.  While I think he is a safety, and maybe they say that so the veterans don't feel threatened, he will be on the field a lot. 

Then we draft Haynes (DE...or is he?) called a DE by Rivera at the presser but he mentioned the Joker position and suggested that he is able to cover TEs in the seam--like a LB.  Personally, I think Haynes is basically going to play the Sam some, DE some, and I think we will stunt him to the QB a lot. 

Get a traditional 4-3 out of your heads.  This defense is going to hunt.  

 

I been trying to tell a lot of Panthers fan this on Twitter. Last year we brought a lot of heavy blitz packages. I think this year we will bring even  Moore heat than most fans will expect. This defense will have to be well conditioned to RUSH how they want to but it can be done. Marquis Haynes has that potential to become a smaller but similarly explosive version of Greg Hardy. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

23 hours ago, LinvilleGorge said:

We've heard these defensive versatility stories before...

Rivera when he was hired:

[paraphrasing] Our defense will feature aspects of both the 4-3 and 3-4.

Reality:

We've always played a pure 4-3

Rivera after Shaq was drafted:

[paraphrasing] Shaq will give us the versatility to stay in our base defense more often.

Reality:

We played the same way on D and Shaq was simply a backup LB.

Oh, and remember this one:

"Despite his 6-foot-4, 323-pound frame, Butler is considered one of the most versatile defensive linemen in this year's draft. Not only does Gettleman covet big players, but Carolina's coaches prefer guys who can play multiple spots. In his four years at Louisiana Tech, Butler played end, three technique and nose tackle."

 

7_N5AAXfEguectTbocTUlVRgk18=.gif

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 hours ago, Hoenheim said:

This is exactly what I was thinking for the entire draft after DJ Moore. More of the same poo. I knew it would just continue when we skipped on Justin Reid in the 2nd, which alot of people were projected us to take in the 1st round lol.

Nothings going to change unless Rivera and Hurney get fired. 

I mean, I'd love to be suprised and for all these guys to work out. But bringing in about 20 different nickle CBs since Norman left and trying to play them everywhere on the field hasnt been working going on 2+ years. 

They say doing the same thing over and over again and expecting different results, is the definition of insanity. 

You mean that Justin Reid that was passed over until the 3rd round?  Maybe he just isn’t as good as everyone in here wanted him to bed.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • In my view, the realistic expectation for this team to compete will start 2027.  At that time, I think we could be looking at the following (this is HIGHLY speculative):   QB:  You know, Bryce.  I am not a fan, but they don't ask me.  But there is reason for hope--and here it is.  Bryce will be entering his prime.  Since we are likely to pay him, there will be changes that I include throughout this exercise--I realistically speculate on what they are going to do with Bryce and then I realistically speculate on what means in terms of the cap and other positions. Bryce HAS IMPROVED.  The idea is that if you give him more weapons and protection, that will continue.  His career:   At this rate, if his growth continues, by 2027 we should expect nearly 30 TDs and about 12 Interceptions and a Rating of about 98.  His completion percentage should settle at 65-66% or so.  If that happens, you can win with it. The following stats demonstrate how the Panthers will be able to afford it (and re-sign Ickey) My guess is they will require about $60m per year. This is why rookies who can play are important.  It also helps us see the blueprint.  You may disagree, but this is the cruel realities of the salary cap. Robert Hunt:  Cut post June 1 and save $19m.  Who do you replace him with?  Ickey. Tershawn Wharton:  Cutting him saves nearly $15m.  We should all hope to see Aaron Hall (UDFA) make the roster and play well.  Regardless, this is a position we would likely have to address in the next draft. Trevin Moehrig:  Cutting Moehrig as the starting SS saves this team $16.5m.   Ransom will be on year 3 of a cheap rookie deal and should be more than ready to take the reins.  their styles are similar.  Furthermore, FS Wheatley (R, 4th round) will be starting. Taylor Moton:  So much depends on his knee, but I have an idea that he can play another 3 years.  extending him could save the team about $5m per year.  Cutting him outright would save the team about $21m. In the most drastic situation, we have to cut Moton and the other three players mentioned.   We would need (in all likelihood) a starting DT and RT.  It is possible that the DE would be addressed, but Wharton's production (so far) could be equaled by a rookie.  Look for a cut free agent and a 2027 draft pick here.  If you cut Moton, you save $21m, and that would be the only big hole to fill.  Having Ickey at RG gives you some depth at T, and Ickey could be the guy.  T could be pick in the 2027 draft (first round), fwiw.  It saves you $21m while costing you $5m, for example. We get younger, creating a core of Freeling, Hecht, and the RT first rounder in 2027) along with Ekownu (second contract in the $15m range, and Lewis, whose contract would be in the $16m range if not extended.)  The OL cuts (Hunt, Moton) would save $40m.  The OL would get younger and still solid with veterans at G.   By cutting Wharton (no brainer if his play stays the same) and Moehrig (good player--but we have Ransom on a rookie contract who would not be that much of a drop off--if any) in addition to Hunt and Moton, we would save over $70m in cap room. We would be able to give Bryce bag  and we would have enough to re-sign Ickey (if the knee is not too risky) to a Guard contract (probably at a discount, coming off that injury).  Furthermore, we could add a RT in the draft (or a RG if Ickey moves to RT) and that would be the only large hole to fill. Correct my logic if you see issues-- On defense, in addition to the aforementioned, Scott ($2m contract) is out, replaced by a 4th round rookie contract. CB Jackson's contract ($7.8m) expires and he is (possibly) replaced by a rookie contract.  At Edge, patrick Jones II's $10m contract expires and he is likely a reserve, and his role is absorbed by Phillips, Scourton, Princely, and possible an UDFA like Isaiah Smith or a 2027 draft pick.   These productive developmental players over the past 2 drafts will pay huge dividends.  On paper, I see the team getting much younger and possibly better while cutting nearly $100m and reallocating that money to get more production.          
    • If everything played out and that last thing happened, I probably just quit. 
×
×
  • Create New...