Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Did anyone else want to see “more” while watching D.J Moore’s tape?


Yaboychris28

Recommended Posts

5 minutes ago, LinvilleGorge said:

Yep, gotta factor in the QB limitations. He was playing with backups and 3rd and 4th string QBs.

You can tell if a WR has won their route regardless of where the ball is thrown.

Now if someone wanted to knock his production that’s a different story.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

One of best traits is how fluid he is. Meaning, his stature and form is always on balance. This gives him an edge even in the smallest of margins, giving him the opportunity to break any tackle and make any catch. He's also a methodical and smart route runner he won't out run the zone or sacrifice the advantages of ball position in man. Add above average hands and I'm expecting great things as everyone should from the highest, or 2nd highest, WR coming out of all college football.

I would hate to be a S or OLB playing against us. The threat that Samuel or Moore will have when they get 3-6 screens a game keeps them cautious when they are in or pushing the box. But they need to get to CMC's hole before he gets too much space in a run.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, steven8989 said:

Dude your just as bad as this other guy on here RunHam. Y'all need to just go pull for another team. You don't anything and I've heard a bunch of people say he reminds them of Brown and Smith. Don't get why y'all are so negative, Ridley is terrible and glad we didn't draft him. He isn't even a first rounder imo.

Don’t quote me, thanks.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I can understand being a little cautious about the pick. But if you've been clamoring for offensive help for Cam Newton for years, and you're legitimately upset about the addition of Moore, you need to seriously reassess some things.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, TheRed said:

I can understand being a little cautious about the pick. But if you've been clamoring for offensive help for Cam Newton for years, and you're legitimately upset about the addition of Moore, you need to seriously reassess some things.

Some solid logic there!

Because he’s listed as a WR regardless of his skill set I should be happy, got it.

Same crap was said about the Samuel pick last year, remind me how that worked out?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, TheRed said:

I can understand being a little cautious about the pick. But if you've been clamoring for offensive help for Cam Newton for years, and you're legitimately upset about the addition of Moore, you need to seriously reassess some things.

There is no use these morons are not going to understand anything you say.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Moore has the ceiling to be a true #1 with homerun speed, and is a better compliment to Funchess than Ridley.

Moore's ceiling is Smitty, Ridley's is more Roddy White. Both can be Pro Bowlers, but Moore can be a true game breaker.

Both are good receivers, and both probably for the mold for what their team was looking for better than the other.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

40 minutes ago, *FreeFua* said:

Some solid logic there!

Because he’s listed as a WR regardless of his skill set I should be happy, got it.

Same crap was said about the Samuel pick last year, remind me how that worked out?

Looked like it was going to work out fairly well once he saw the field, which unfortunately wasn't for long.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

No because I actually pay attention. Same reason I knew we weren't going S there.....just a little bit of attention paying....well...pays off.

I don't think Saca could fug this analysis up....actually look forward to his gifs and tweets from randos.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Torn achilles.  The reason he was out more than half of last season.
    • When the panthers are bad, we sell a shockingly low number of jerseys, and options become limited. In the good years, we had a lot of different options. I think T-Mac is going to have to play well on the field for his jersey to get produced in the FUSE template. 
    • it's not the only way to be a threat, it's certainly important for certain roles in an offense and for certain type players and offenses.  as is the ability to get open quickly and generate easy throws.   as far as Renfrow goes, I have consistently said he is sort of his own thing and not really in comp w/ others here.  It's a niche role/job.  Anyone talking about something else from him isn't me.  Just depends if we want to do what he does and if he can still do it.  as far as AT goes, yeah, he does lower our ceiling given the % of our offense that goes through him and his limitations at this stage in his career.    He should be a roleplayer, much like Renfrow should be if we want to insert what he does into the O....not an O being run through him.    Renfrow isn't going to lower the ceiling if used correctly.  Niche assignments to move chains.   It's like a short yardage RB that comes in to pick a random play.  Renfrow is best at that 3rd and 4 type scenario IMO. AT lowers the ceiling because we build the pass game off an old WR that shouldn't be the focal point of a pass attack.  Not to mention, Bryce Young is practically tailor made to get the ball in the hands of YAC players.   So you need those type on the field. 
×
×
  • Create New...