Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Tre Boston has talked with Panthers' front office


Recommended Posts

I don’t know that we do anything at S. I see us going with Gaulden, Adams, Scearcy, and Jones.

 

If we add someone via FA or cuts more likely it will be Fozzy Whitaker’s replacement at RB. Having CAP and Samuel means Fozzy isn’t needed. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

43 minutes ago, Swaggasaurus said:

I don’t know that we do anything at S. I see us going with Gaulden, Adams, Scearcy, and Jones.

 

If we add someone via FA or cuts more likely it will be Fozzy Whitaker’s replacement at RB. Having CAP and Samuel means Fozzy isn’t needed. 

This would be a disaster IMO. 

Adams is serviceable but each year longer in the league, he becomes more of a liability and needs a partner to cover his flaws.

Searcy is a 7 year younger Adams....same issue. Good guy if he has a better compliment beside him.

Jones is a ST player and maybe an occasional sub-package DB....he scares me when I see him on the field.

Gaulden is a late third-round rookie that is seen equally as much as a corner as a safety. I do think he will be a good safety in time, but not in year one. 

Bottom line is we need to get Eric Reid, Kenny Vaccarro, Tre Boston or kick the tires in Seattle on Earl Thomas trade. It would probably cost us a 2nd next year, but to add one of the league's best safeties to a promising Gaulden and young CBs like Bradberry, Jackson, Cockrell, Elder and Seymour is the kind of move that SB contending teams make. Doubt he actually gets traded, and I wouldn't want to give up a 2nd round pick, but man.....Earl roaming our secondary with Luke handling the guys up front would be a beautiful thing.

I do agree adding a RB is equally as important, so an Orleans Darkwa, CJ Anderson, Morris or even West signing makes a ton of sense. 

Bottom line is that we are def not done yet. I think Marty lands a SAF and a RB and roles the dice on Moton being the answer at LG, with maybe Larsen and Sriles getting the next crack in camp.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • The division is most certainly wide open. The Bucs are a problem but Baker Mayfield is and will remain his own worst enemy it's a matter of when not if he has a bad game or even a stretch of bad games. As far as the Panthers they have done an admirable job of trying to address needs as best they can without pulling a Scott Fitterer and getting desperate which has only made us worse off in the past. On the Bryce subject all anyone can really say at this point is we just have to wait and see. This is the year and despite what the Panthers may say publicly doubling down and going all in on WR is as good as any sign anyone should need that they expect Bryce Young to have a very productive and convincing season. The pieces are in place. They aren't perfect but nothing ever will be. Regardless there's honestly no excuse for this staff and this team not to be able to compete in this iteration of the NFC South. Also just want to say this because I can say the hyper defensive posts already being made in here and it's probably going to be a season with highs and lows again but hopefully more highs for sure. But just because there is dialogue about a position group or a player that challenges your preconceived notions or makes you uncomfortable does not make it "hate" or "anti" this player or that player. For some people who talk a lot about nuance you would think this wouldn't need to be stated but that's where we're at. 
    • If I was a coach I would preach "Don't let the refs decide the game" because as soon as you let the NFL the chance to help their bottom dollar whether it be teams that make most money or gambling then they will screw the team that doesn't fit their bottom line......is it rigged? No but do they try and make certain narratives happen abso-freakin-lutley. As I stated in a previous thread NFL players are the ones that SHOULD have all guaranteed contracts but the boot lickers on this forum disagree and argue for the billionaires in this world who own these teams, sheep
    • I wont go quite so far as to say games are rigged.  You wouldnt have to work hard to convince me there was the occasional thumb on the scale but outright rigged? nah.   but collusion on the rest of the "business" of football, sure.  No one really believes that the only time the 32 owners act as one is during the negotiations of the CBA do they?
×
×
  • Create New...