Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Tepper committed to CLT; "at least one finalist had eyes on stadium in SC"


UNCrules2187

Recommended Posts

7 minutes ago, UNCrules2187 said:

Per @RapSheet

Assuming that'd be Navarro in which case glad he didn't get the team.

Navarro wanted to keep BOA.

LaCanfora reported that one of the reasons Tepper placed a lower bid was that he didn't like the stadium.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Mr. Scot said:

Navarro wanted to keep BOA.

LaCanfora reported that one of the reasons Tepper placed a lower bid was that he didn't like the stadium.

If there's a discrepancy in reporting between Rapoport and La Canfora, go with Rapoport every time.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Mr. Scot said:

No argument on that.

Guess what I mean is: you can pretty much throw out what La Canfora said about which guy wanted which improvements to the stadium. If Tepper doesn't want the stadium in SC, that leaves us with Navarro, Kestenbaum, or Rubin. Which of those makes the most sense to you? Keep in mind that Kestenbaum and Rubin seem to have faded away weeks ago.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Marcogreenbush said:

South Carolina sucks ! Only thing they got going for them is myrtle beach , I like myrtle beach , other then that North Carolina is the better state in general . I like our location 

I doubt a SC move meant something like Charleston or Columbia. Probably more like Fort Mill or Indian Land. Still, that would have sucked so hard compared to having one in Charlotte.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

23 minutes ago, ECUPantherFan said:

Ugh.  South Carolina.  

I would love to hear the proposed locations in SC.  The only one that would make sense would be Fort Mill.

I am guessing Florence.  They have a booming paper mill there and  their Motel 6 is quite nice.  Seriously, there is nowhere in SC that makes sense.  I did like the idea of a stadium on the line--if ever a new stadium situation comes up as before, they would have to actually pay something for it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Would Morgan or Beason have been HOFers' if injuries hadn't derailed their careers?  I was not a close watcher of the game when Morgan was in his prime but I thought Beason had a few seasons at close to Lukes' level of play.
    • Franchise QBs feast when things are rolling and the tide that raises boats when things are going sideways.  Bryce isn't that. He's a complimentary player, that's it.  When the defense and STs are on point, he plays loose and it shows.  When we are in a dog fight and things haven't gone our way, he struggles.  It's that simple. He's not a horrible QB, but he's not top tier either.  So the question begs, is this worthy of a second contract?  The answer should be no.  It definitely is my answer. Bryce will never be a QB that can produce wins largely on his arm.  That's a FRANCHISE QB, any other QB is simply a placeholder at the starter's position until that guy can be found.   At some point the excuses of lack of weapons will be a straw man.  Heck, it's nearly there now.  I mean if he doesn't look even better than last year will we blame it on the TE position?  'Well if Bryce only had a player like Kelce, Kittle or Gronk on this team...'  Are we really going to do that?  
    • When I arrived at college, I was 18, not too much younger than some of these draft picks.  It was not a huge school, but there were guys on the team who were 21, 22, 23....playing ahead of me.  I was seventh on the depth chart.  Those guys have been through a few seasons, were stronger, more knowledgeable.  I was a better raw player than some of them, but those other factors matter.  As I grew stronger, more familiar with the playbook, and learned what it was like to play in college, I gradually improved and with that, I rose up the depth chart.  It took most of my freshman year for the light to come on.  Had the coach thrown me into the starting lineup day 1, I would have probably failed.    And that was college.  So I agree with you based on my experience on a much lower level.  Frankly, I think that is why so many kids drafted to fill huge gaps bust.  The teams are desperate.  Anyone who looks to fill vacancies in the starting lineup through the draft is desperate.  You draft depth to develop.  For this reason, I say, "Let Walker start for a while."  Maybe Brazzell can be our WR 4.  Throw Hunter into a rotation and ask him to do one or two things.  Freeling needs some strength and he needs to work on run blocking.
×
×
  • Create New...