Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

About the new stadium...


MHS831

Recommended Posts

2 minutes ago, Squirrel said:

I bet Tepper doesn't bring up a new stadium for atleast 2 years. 

This is the way to refer to a stadium that doesn't exist and isn't planned- 'a' new stadium, not 'the' new stadium.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Squirrel said:

I bet Tepper doesn't bring up a new stadium for atleast 2 years. 

In 2022 the city is due to give 75 million to owner for upgrades.  I be he tries at that time to parlay that into much more for a new stadium.  While also threatening to leave.  It's just business 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Squirrel said:

I bet Tepper doesn't bring up a new stadium for atleast 2 years. 

Are you kidding?  He's going to be asked about it everytime he has a press conference by Joe the Schmo.  I can't wait to hear him tell Person to fug off, you know it's coming.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, ARSEN said:

If he wants to ask Charlotte for money, the stadium better be in Charlotte and not SC. Would be dumb for us to pay money and SC get all the revenue....

He will have both states lining up to throw money at him like a stripper at a frat party.  You watch.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, caatfan said:

This is the way to refer to a stadium that doesn't exist and isn't planned- 'a' new stadium, not 'the' new stadium.

The writing is already on the wall, whether there are plans yet or not.  Proactive speculation based on concrete facts and patterns of behavior elsewhere at other times. Take Minnesota  for example. They used Goodell to leverage the stadium during the 11th hour.  Take Oakland for another one--no new stadium, the owners approve a move to Vegas.   Do you think he WON'T try for a new stadium?  That could lead to a threat to move the team if he does not get it, and Richardson showed us  how people will react.  Tepper is a businessman.  Objective.  I will say that he will do what they did in Minnesota in 3-5 years.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • No, you're right. It doesn't mean you can't call out his flaws and poor play. But it also doesn't mean you can't admit when he plays well and shows improvement. Not you personally, just in general I mean.
    • I will say, I do think there's a version of Bryce that could be really successful as a high-volume passer in a spread-based offense built around quick throws and timing-based intermediate throws with deeper throws schemed up around them. I actually think the power run based offense we're running is a poor fit for Bryce as it requires him to play under center far more often. It's a very traditional offensive approach whereas I think a scheme that spreads defenses out and lets Bryce distribute the ball quickly with anticipation and accuracy is the sweet spot for him. The key, of course, is to find a way to run the ball efficiently out of those formations. Our personnel right now (backs and OL) aren't good fits for that style of offense and I'm not sure it's a scheme Dave Canales favors very much either.
    • I root for him, and I hope for the best, as does essentially everyone. But that doesn’t mean you can’t call out flaws and bad plays. And that’s what a lot of people get wrong.  I hope I’m wrong and that he continues to improve a lot, I just doubt it. But I’ve been wrong before 
×
×
  • Create New...