Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

About the new stadium...


MHS831

Recommended Posts

2 minutes ago, Squirrel said:

I bet Tepper doesn't bring up a new stadium for atleast 2 years. 

This is the way to refer to a stadium that doesn't exist and isn't planned- 'a' new stadium, not 'the' new stadium.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Squirrel said:

I bet Tepper doesn't bring up a new stadium for atleast 2 years. 

In 2022 the city is due to give 75 million to owner for upgrades.  I be he tries at that time to parlay that into much more for a new stadium.  While also threatening to leave.  It's just business 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Squirrel said:

I bet Tepper doesn't bring up a new stadium for atleast 2 years. 

Are you kidding?  He's going to be asked about it everytime he has a press conference by Joe the Schmo.  I can't wait to hear him tell Person to fug off, you know it's coming.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, ARSEN said:

If he wants to ask Charlotte for money, the stadium better be in Charlotte and not SC. Would be dumb for us to pay money and SC get all the revenue....

He will have both states lining up to throw money at him like a stripper at a frat party.  You watch.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, caatfan said:

This is the way to refer to a stadium that doesn't exist and isn't planned- 'a' new stadium, not 'the' new stadium.

The writing is already on the wall, whether there are plans yet or not.  Proactive speculation based on concrete facts and patterns of behavior elsewhere at other times. Take Minnesota  for example. They used Goodell to leverage the stadium during the 11th hour.  Take Oakland for another one--no new stadium, the owners approve a move to Vegas.   Do you think he WON'T try for a new stadium?  That could lead to a threat to move the team if he does not get it, and Richardson showed us  how people will react.  Tepper is a businessman.  Objective.  I will say that he will do what they did in Minnesota in 3-5 years.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Not many people talking about DT, but we have a need.  (DE)  Now this guy is a NT like Brown III
    • But is it about letting Bryce develop or about winning games? Bryce has not been good enough to be an uncontested starter. He just hasn't. How many times has last drive Bryce shown up for 4 entire quarters? Once in 3 seasons? You aren't going to win 9 or 10 one score games every season year in and year out. You may want Bryce in the last 2 minutes. I want that Bryce the full 60.  No one is saying you have to give up on him, but bringing in another QB that can do anything is not hindering Bryce. It helps the team and that's where the focus needs to be. If drafting Sadiq to plague the middle of the field would help out offense, but Bryce struggles to get pass into the middle of the field, is Sadiq a bad pick? Or could he be a good pick with a better option at QB? We can't be afraid to improve. QB, TE, OL, LB, DL, CB, S. It doesn't matter. The goal is SBs, not 5 to 8 years seeing waiting to see if Bryce can develop while the rest of the league keeps passing us by.  Sadiq is a nice option, but I think we have to address tackle if one we like is there because we are painfully thin after this year, a LB to general the field, and a true ball hawking safety that can set the tone in the secondary. Those 3 positions are bigger game changers than a TE that will likely struggle to make a round 1 impact in this offense. 
    • Lil Stanky 100% in the dot tonight... And our 2nd line has been our best offensive line this season. Maybe our 2C really was on the roster this whole time...?
×
×
  • Create New...