Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Frank could come off the books after this year.. How?


bLACKpANTHER

Recommended Posts

Frank Kaminsky is a RFA next year - his qualifying offer would only be $4.9m. If any other team extends an offer that beats that - do you let him walk?

I guess this is his final shot to prove himself worth a damn this year. It's a 'wait and see' issue but wanted to run the idea of creating more space next year.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

One huge takeaway from the late game last night was Frank being interviewed. He mentioned the coaching staff wanting him to play a lot of Center. I really like that idea. He played Center in college and always seemed like he was playing out of position. It seemed like his best games were when he was at Center. 

Now, I won't mind if we don't resign because he has disappointed but the idea of him playing at Center really gives him a chance. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If my math is correct we can open up about 24 mil after next year.  Let's say 3-4 mill for draft picks that leaves around 20 for Kemba...is that enough?  First year maybe with larger money later.  Seems possible if he wants to stay.

This would include dropping Frank and Lamb and possibly Bacon.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 hours ago, MillionDollarCam said:

Frank playing center is a catch 22. Imagining him trying to guard Ayton down low makes me cringe, but imagining Ayton trying to guard Frank at the perimeter makes me laugh.

I have a feeling this team is going to play matchups. Against guys like Ayton, Howard, Cousins expect to see more Biz and Hernangomez.  Quicker Centers we will use Cody and Frank. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

He has like no value on the market or to our team.  He can't out power anyone and his 3 ability in the NBA (which is supposed to be his strength) is streaky at best.  He's useless except for stupid social media dribble.    

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'd say we let him walk if someone's dumb enough to swoop in and massively overpay. He's looking more and more like a finished product and, unless there's a big leap this season, that's not gonna be worth a huge financial commitment. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

48 minutes ago, ImfromClayton said:

With Batum moving to the 3, and Bridges waiting in the wings, I wonder if we don't see a situation where MKG can play the 4?  If so, could be a situation where MKG, Marvin, and Frank are fighting for two spots.

he is same size and weight as Draymond - so i don't see why not.. I've never even thought about MKG at the 4..

that is interesting..

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Unless Bridges is a total bust and/or we trade Marv, I can see MKG getting very limited playing time this season.  His offensive game is the same as it was three years ago and his defense has started to slip, not to mention he can't stay healthy.  Even a 4 these days has to be able to hit a jump shot, and preferably 3s, and MKG still can't throw it in the ocean so what exactly is he bringing to the table at this point?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • https://www.yahoo.com/sports/article/versatile-2nd-db-named-panthers-154026075.html Smith-Wade's ability to play corner, nickel and safety makes him valuable to a young defense trying to rebuild after finishing last in the NFL a year ago. "Chau took advantage of an opportunity,'' coach Dave Canales said. "He made tackles. He had an opportunity on an interception, and he made it.'' Our defense has got to come alive for us to have a chance of winning our Division!
    • lol, that second part is quite literally one of the dumbest things ever. Having or not having guaranteed contracts has absolutely nothing to do with how much these billionaires have to pay.  Because there is a hard cap and a minimum cap spend requirement, and teams either use their cap or roll it over to use it all the next year, so the owners have to pay the same amount of money in the end no matter what. Having fully guaranteed contracts in the NFL would only hurt salary cap management, and thus would end up screwing over the team and its fan base when teams kiss on signings as they take up cap room that is needed to improve the roster. Look at the Browns with Watson, they gave him the fully guaranteed deal and all it’s doing is sucking up massive cap space now.  If they hadn’t done that, the owner would still be paying the same amount of money each year as that cap space would still be used elsewhere. If you want to argue for fully guaranteed contracts because the players deserve it, that’s an entirely different argument and a fair one to discuss.  But anyone against fully guaranteed deals isn’t doing it to argue for the billionaire owners.
×
×
  • Create New...