Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Is it just me?


BuckNaked

Recommended Posts

6 minutes ago, E CaT PanTHer 2 said:

Lol meant the clock only stops under 2min the 2nd and 4th quarters

You’re referring to two minute warnings, I think. But the issue being referred to is the game clock not stopping when a player catches the ball and runs out of bounds. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Jackofalltrades said:

That is a new rule, Olsen was marked down inside the field of play thus the clock didn’t stop. They explained it in the radio feed. 

What is the rule exactly? I don't understand how the ref can just choose to mark him down inside the field of play? He wasn't touched and he didn't give himself up... He was sliding to catch the ball not to give himself up. That call is the kind of call that can cost you a game.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Jackofalltrades said:

That is a new rule, Olsen was marked down inside the field of play thus the clock didn’t stop. They explained it in the radio feed. 

The marking him down part was the poor reffing. Unless there’s some weird new rule like college where they’re down as soon as they hit the ground, cuz nobody touched him before he slid out, to my recollection. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

So,,   if  Greg had been able to run out of bounds, instead of a sliding catch, on his knees catch,,   the clock would have stopped  ??

By being on his knees when the catch was made ,, it was like ...  Greg was giving himself up inbounds ?  so the clock kept running ?

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, OceanPanther said:

So,,   if  Greg had been able to run out of bounds, instead of a sliding catch, on his knees catch,,   the clock would have stopped  ??

By being on his knees when the catch was made ,, it was like ...  Greg was giving himself up inbounds ?  so the clock kept running ?

 

Exactly.  Same as "taking a knee" at the end of the game or when fielding a kickoff.  The play is dead at that spot. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • In my opinion Fitterer was probably right about not paying McCaffrey. Now not wanting to "pay RBs" in my opinion isn't something you want to set in stone, to me it all comes down to the individual.
    • Maybe I'm just not understanding, but everywhere that I have read says that signing bonuses go against the cap prorated by as much as five years. The following example uses Andrew Luck's rookie contract as an example. "Take Andrew Luck, the first overall pick in the 2012 NFL draft. Luck signed a four-year contract with the Colts worth $22.1 million and included a $14.5 million signing bonus. Rather than a $14.5 million cap hit in 2012, the Colts spread out his signing bonus over the life of his contract. The hit against the cap would be $3.625 million per year over four years instead of a direct cap hit of $14.5 million directly in 2012. This gave the Colts more leverage and cap flexibility in signing other players." https://www.the33rdteam.com/nfl-signing-bonuses-explained/ I don't know why some of you think that signing bonuses aren't counted against the cap over the length of the contract, but whatever.   "The bonus with a signing is usually the most garish aspect of a rookie contract. Bonus is the immediate cash players receive when they ink a deal. It factors into the cap, but only for the whole contract duration, in terms of salary cap calculations. In the case of Bryce Young’s $24.6 million signing bonus, that’s prorated to approximately $6.15 million per season over a four-year deal. This format allows teams to handle the cap and provides rookies with some short-term fiscal stability, which is important given the high injury risk in this league." https://collegefootballnetwork.com/how-rookie-contracts-work-in-the-nfl/ I understand how signing bonuses can be a useful tool in order to manage the cap, and as one of the article suggests, signing bonuses may become important if you have a tight cap, but the bill is always going to come due. I'm not necessarily referring to you Tuka, but it seems to me that others simply don't want to understand that fact which is why they're reacting to what I'm saying negatively. How odd. In any event, I have a better general understanding of why signing bonuses are used now, and it's generally to fit salaries under the cap. Surely players, whether they be rookies or not, love a signing bonus because they get a good portion of their money up front. This in turn gives them more security and probably amounts to tax benefits as well. I also understand why teams would not want to use signing bonuses, particularly for players or draftees who have a higher probability of being gone before a contract even ends.
    • Get any shot you can at humane society, so much cheaper
×
×
  • Create New...