Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Sirles to I.R, does Robinson start at RT week 1?

panther4life

By panther4life,
in Carolina Panthers

Recommended Posts

panther4life Community Regular

panther4life

Posted
Posted

Can’t believe they decided to send Sirles to Injured reserve with a hamstring injury.

Moton looks like the starter at LT while Kalil is out. Williams and Robinson who we just traded for are the only othe tackles on the roster. 

Any chance Williams is ready to go week 1? If not Robinson has to start right? 

On the bright side he must be better than Clausell and Bisnowoty, however that isn’t saying much.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
MHS831 Grand Master

MHS831

Posted
Posted

Robinson has a history of foot injuries--and he hurt his foot Thursday night vs Cleveland.  Hope Marty did his homework.  We don't need 4 Tackles on IR  (Williams, Kalil, Sirles...) 

Not serious.  Kalil fans headed to SC for some bottle rockets.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Woodie Newbie

Woodie

Posted
Posted
12 minutes ago, MHS831 said:

Robinson has a history of foot injuries--and he hurt his foot Thursday night vs Cleveland.  Hope Marty did his homework.  We don't need 4 Tackles on IR  (Williams, Kalil, Sirles...) 

Not serious.  Kalil fans headed to SC for some bottle rockets.

It was a very low risk deal.  The condition for the 7th is likely based on him playing a certain number of games.  So, if his foot continues to be a problem, we'll likely let him go and not owe anything.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Woodie Newbie

Woodie

Posted
Posted
13 minutes ago, WarPanthers89 said:

This is insane. We have two tackles currently healthy on the team, one was just  picked up an hour ago........can you imagine if Moton gets hurt game one?????

Yeah, this is a real concern.  Despite people wanting some sort of savior to come from cuts or a trade, the chances of anyone giving up a serviceable OT at this point is very small.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Mr. Scot Grand Master

Mr. Scot

Posted
Posted
8 minutes ago, Woodie said:

It was a very low risk deal.  The condition for the 7th is likely based on him playing a certain number of games.  So, if his foot continues to be a problem, we'll likely let him go and not owe anything.

That part doesn't bother me.

21 minutes ago, WarPanthers89 said:

This is insane. We have two tackles currently healthy on the team, one was just  picked up an hour ago........can you imagine if Moton gets hurt game one?????

That does.

We're thinner than an anorexic supermodel right now.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
KB_fan Proficient

KB_fan

Posted
Posted
10 minutes ago, Woodie said:

It was a very low risk deal.  The condition for the 7th is likely based on him playing a certain number of games.  So, if his foot continues to be a problem, we'll likely let him go and not owe anything.

True. But in the meantime we still need a healthy RT for week 1. For now Robinson is the guy. He'd better be 100%.

And who's behind Moton and Robinson?!

Wonder if there's still a chance that Williams or Matt will be sent to short-term IR to free up a spot to bring in someone else.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Mr. Scot Grand Master

Mr. Scot

Posted
Posted
Just now, KB_fan said:

True. But in the meantime we still need a healthy RT for week 1.

Wonder if there's still a chance that Williams or Matt will be sent to short-term IR to free up a spot to bring in someone else.

Word that they're not gonna IR Williams. Don't think it was ever an option for Kalil.

Barring another move, this is what we got.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • cranky
      2027: Sharing my thoughts on the cap without a lotta research

      By cranky · Posted

      I can't help but think that you are equating physical attributes alone with wins. I don't subscribe to that thought. No one will argue that Young has a strong arm, but he makes up for it in other ways. The real limitation for him is he needs good route runners with great hands. That's why Young was so good at the end of the 24 season. Thielen and Coker were perfect receivers for him and he had his best games with them. Not having them to start the 25 season hurt. Look at the first 10 games in 25 with a rookie receiver and no Coker and then look at the final 7 games with a more experienced rookie and Coker back and there is a telling difference in Young's performance. Prior to week 10, Young had 1 game with a QB rating above 100, 2 games with a rating above 90 and 6 games with a rating below 90. In the last 7 games with Coker back, Young had 3 games with a QB rating above 100, 2 games with a rating above 90 and only 2 games with a rating below 90. The tools a QB has to work with matter more than their arm strength.  To go back to Darnold and Stafford, yes they both have great arm strength but neither had much success with that alone. As I already pointed out, Stafford, even with a canon for an arm, only had 4 winning seasons in his first 12 years. It was only when he went to the right environment that he had true success.
    • Jens
      Bryce Young 5th year option exercised

      By Jens · Posted

      One more wasted year! ☹️
    • tukafan21
      Report: Panthers great Luke Kuechly being eyed for big TV job

      By tukafan21 · Posted

      I don't love this role for him if I'm being totally honest The pregame show is much more flash than substance and doesn't seem like the right fit for what Luke would bring to the table, and that's his vision of the game. I'd like to see him do something where it more involves him breaking down film and explaining what he's seeing out there, as he sees the game in a way very few ever have.
×
×
  • Create New...