Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Does Jackson have a higher ceiling than Bradberry?


Manther

Recommended Posts

I went back and watched the Patriots game.  The 3rd down stop Jackson made took some impressive athleticism, as Jackson was following another receiver downfield and had to come back.  I know there is going to be some rookie growing pains, but he looks better as a rookie than Bradberry.  He might turn out to be the better corner.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Not sure.  If I had to say right now, I would say yes.   But I remember how bad people used to think of Norman before he blew up.  So I don't think the Bradberry ship has sailed.  It just Bradberry doesn't have the swagger/aggressiveness that imo makes a great cornerback.   Seems like he just plays sound football.   Jackson on the other hand has that swagger and I can see him being agressive (sometimes to his detriment).  So far we are playing generic zones for the most part.  However in TC I saw jackson in press and the 2 camps sessions I went to he looked impressive. 

So short answer,  I think Jackson has the higher ceiling, but I don' know if ultimately he will end up being the better cornerback.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Pretty sure Bradberry was one of the best CBs in the NFL statistically as a rookie. He may have had a sophomore slump but he is capable of being really good. I'm not going to already say Jackson is better based off one play in one game of the preseason. That's crazy. I think they will be great together

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Jackson's ceiling is probably higher. I still haven't given up on Bradberry yet although he definitely had a rough year in 2017. Jackson strikes me as a sugar or poo guy at the moment but maybe he can thrive as the season progresses. We need something out of one or both of them. I don't know that we can afford even one of our starters to stink it up, because the secondary as a whole is pretty suspect. 

Let's just hope Bradberry can get back to his rookie form AND Jackson shows he is NFL ready right out of the gate. We damn sure need it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Professor Chaos said:

Bradberry is in his 3rd year and they're still having to play him off the line to keep him from getting burned every drive. So yes, I would like to think that Donte is going to be better.

Do they have to or do they choose to?

We've seen corners playing off the line pretty consistently under Rivera.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I just hope the two of them can prove to be a legit starting CB tandem. One thing I do hope we see is to get away from the whole RCB/LCB concept. If we don't, I fear our opponents will just move their WRs around to create favorable match ups. Bradberry on a speedy deep threat and Jackson on a big, physical WR doesn't favor us and I think it's what we'll see if we insist on keeping Bradberry and Jackson married to one side or the other.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I know it's only been training camp and one preseason game, but I think T-Mac has already shown his floor to be exactly what I said about him in the pre-draft process. That his floor if he never improves his game, is as one of the best #2 WRs in the NFL, if not even still a low end #1 (i.e. a 25th-ish best WR in the league). I think it's safe to say he's already established himself as our #1, and there are only a small handful of teams in the league where I don't think he'd be their starting #2 WR in Week 1. Bengals (Higgins), Dolphins (Waddle), Eagles (Smith), Bucs (Godwin if healthy), Rams (Adams) are really the only teams where I think he'd be the #3 as a rookie in Week 1.  A few others like the Lions (Williams), Bears (Odunze), Seahawks (Kupp), Commanders (Deebo), where he'd be the 2b to start the season, just because they're vets and/or already have a year or two of experience with their team/QB. And even having said that, I think by year 2, he's better than every one of those players (And no, I'm not saying he's already going to be better than a prime version of Adams, just whatever he'll be at 33 next year), and same goes for Kupp, but that's more because it seems like his body might be quitting on him in a way that hasn't happened to Adams (yet).
    • Well to be fair, Horn not practicing right now to let his stitches heal up from a car accident isn't something that should be concerning.  Sure, you don't want him missing practice leading into the season, but it's one that once healed, won't have lingering affects or fear of re-injuring it, it was just bad luck.
    • Quality backups are absolutely important. This franchise has been plagued with depth problems. That said, there is a little bit of dismay that Mays can't beat out a 1-legged man, and all the talk going into the off-season was how BC would certainly be gone since he had position versatility.  In the end, it doesn't matter too awfully much, as I would be shocked to no end if Corbett makes it through the season. We know what we have in reserve, and that should surely be better than trying to sign random fat guys mid season to try and take over.
×
×
  • Create New...