Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Playing defense as the GM (Hypothetical)


TheCasillas

Recommended Posts

I am really curious about people's opinion on this matter. This is completely hypothetical and more me wanting to hear out your perspective. Here it is:

Failcons have lost both starting safeties. They need help - Earl Thomas is available. You are the GM of the Panthers, in effort to prevent the Failcons from getting their safety situation resolved, and the need of a safety to resolve your own team's concern. Do you go into a bidding/trade war with the Failcons to acquire Thomas or just watch the Failcons trade away their future and destroy their cap?

I'd love to hear your opinions.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 minutes ago, BrianS said:

Hell no.  While I do agree that we need to address safety, Earl Thomas isn't what we need.

Especially if it involves any sort of "bidding war".  Let someone else overpay.

So you wouldn't try to screw up the Failcons future by tactically increasing the price tag?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

There have been zero legitimate reports of any Falcons interest in Thomas. Not even an "exploring all possibilities" type report to include Thomas. Not sure why people think this is a thing... could change but as of now there's no reason to discuss this.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, t96 said:

There have been zero legitimate reports of any Falcons interest in Thomas. Not even an "exploring all possibilities" type report to include Thomas. Not sure why people think this is a thing... could change but as of now there's no reason to discuss this.

Did I fail to put "Hypothetical" in the OP or Title? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If I were to trade for Thomas, I'd be doing it because I felt like he was the missing piece getting us over the hump to make us a SB caliber team. I would never make a trade just to block a division rival.

The fact that the Seahawks turned down a 2nd rounder from the Cowboys pretty much rules him out in my mind. I can't rationalize trading more than that for an aging safety that's starting to become injury prone who wants big money.

In reality, it doesn't matter anyway. We probably wouldn't trade a stale pack of crackers and pay him veteran minimum because he plays safety and we don't give a single flying fug about the safety position. Maybe when Thomas is 38 and would struggle to break 5 flat in the 40 he'll fit our mold for a safety.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The first answer is absolutely not, in any circumstance, at any time.

The NFL, especially the GM's and HC's are a very close lot. 

 

You call the Hawks and offer a 2 because you think the Falcons may offer a 3?  Or you offer a 2 and a 3 cause the Falcons have the higher 2nd?

What happens when the Hawks say deal...it's a 2 and a 3, and he will be on the plane this afternoon with medicals in hand.

Now what?  You have sent away a 2 and a 3, for a player who is going to be pissed for having to move across country, but in addition, got traded to a team who can't extend him this season (what he's pissed about), and can't afford to sign him in the offseason.

OK, that's a bad move...only thing you can do is tag him next year (if we could afford that), and hope he loves Charlotte so much that he just shows up on another 1 year deal.  And you lost a 2 and a 3.

The other possibility is you just say...."nah, I'm kidding, I was just trying to get Dimitroff to over pay...you know a little gamemanship, we really don't want him".

Now you have burned, at a minimum, relationships with 2 GM's and 2 HC's.

Not a smart move long term no matter which way you shake it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, thefuzz said:

The first answer is absolutely not, in any circumstance, at any time.

The NFL, especially the GM's and HC's are a very close lot. 

 

You call the Hawks and offer a 2 because you think the Falcons may offer a 3?  Or you offer a 2 and a 3 cause the Falcons have the higher 2nd?

What happens when the Hawks say deal...it's a 2 and a 3, and he will be on the plane this afternoon with medicals in hand.

Now what?  You have sent away a 2 and a 3, for a player who is going to be pissed for having to move across country, but in addition, got traded to a team who can't extend him this season (what he's pissed about), and can't afford to sign him in the offseason.

OK, that's a bad move...only thing you can do is tag him next year (if we could afford that), and hope he loves Charlotte so much that he just shows up on another 1 year deal.  And you lost a 2 and a 3.

The other possibility is you just say...."nah, I'm kidding, I was just trying to get Dimitroff to over pay...you know a little gamemanship, we really don't want him".

Now you have burned, at a minimum, relationships with 2 GM's and 2 HC's.

Not a smart move long term no matter which way you shake it.

I’m glad you brought this up. Bruce Allen use to do this while he was with the Bucs. He’d call other GM “buddies” and tell them lim going to tell this team you offered me an additional pick to squeeze them for more. If they reach out, just nod. I’ll get you back come draft time.”

Now Bruce Allen wasn’t a favorite GM around the league, but he would do this. Especially if it was a rookie GM he was squeezing.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

come trade deadline if both seahawks and cowboys have losing records i'd explore trading for thomas, obviously barring if he really wants to be here or is he deadset on being a cowboy. we'll have the money to pay him and don't have any money invested in the secondary. however i wouldn't go above a 3rd round pick regardless of what the falcons offered.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I wouldn't mind trying to keep him away from them in a little bit of a trading war. But at the end of the day I would prefer they pay too much for him and hurt them for years to come. However we need a Safety who is young and has four or five more good years in him. Know of anyone? asking for a friend.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Cpt slay a ho said:

come trade deadline if both seahawks and cowboys have losing records i'd explore trading for thomas, obviously barring if he really wants to be here or is he deadset on being a cowboy. we'll have the money to pay him and don't have any money invested in the secondary. however i wouldn't go above a 3rd round pick regardless of what the falcons offered.

We don't have the money to pay him.

And we don't have a lot of money invested in the secondary, yet.  But we do have Bradberry coming up very soon, and he won't be cheap.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • If we pay Bryce like a franchise QB we're completely and utterly buttfuged.
    • In my view, the realistic expectation for this team to compete will start 2027.  At that time, I think we could be looking at the following (this is HIGHLY speculative):   QB:  You know, Bryce.  I am not a fan, but they don't ask me.  But there is reason for hope--and here it is.  Bryce will be entering his prime.  Since we are likely to pay him, there will be changes that I include throughout this exercise--I realistically speculate on what they are going to do with Bryce and then I realistically speculate on what means in terms of the cap and other positions. Bryce HAS IMPROVED.  The idea is that if you give him more weapons and protection, that will continue.  His career:   At this rate, if his growth continues, by 2027 we should expect nearly 30 TDs and about 12 Interceptions and a Rating of about 98.  His completion percentage should settle at 65-66% or so.  If that happens, you can win with it. The following stats demonstrate how the Panthers will be able to afford it (and re-sign Ickey) My guess is they will require about $60m per year. This is why rookies who can play are important.  It also helps us see the blueprint.  You may disagree, but this is the cruel realities of the salary cap. Robert Hunt:  Cut post June 1 and save $19m.  Who do you replace him with?  Ickey. Tershawn Wharton:  Cutting him saves nearly $15m.  We should all hope to see Aaron Hall (UDFA) make the roster and play well.  Regardless, this is a position we would likely have to address in the next draft. Trevin Moehrig:  Cutting Moehrig as the starting SS saves this team $16.5m.   Ransom will be on year 3 of a cheap rookie deal and should be more than ready to take the reins.  their styles are similar.  Furthermore, FS Wheatley (R, 4th round) will be starting. Taylor Moton:  So much depends on his knee, but I have an idea that he can play another 3 years.  extending him could save the team about $5m per year.  Cutting him outright would save the team about $21m. In the most drastic situation, we have to cut Moton and the other three players mentioned.   We would need (in all likelihood) a starting DT and RT.  It is possible that the DE would be addressed, but Wharton's production (so far) could be equaled by a rookie.  Look for a cut free agent and a 2027 draft pick here.  If you cut Moton, you save $21m, and that would be the only big hole to fill.  Having Ickey at RG gives you some depth at T, and Ickey could be the guy.  T could be pick in the 2027 draft (first round), fwiw.  It saves you $21m while costing you $5m, for example. We get younger, creating a core of Freeling, Hecht, and the RT first rounder in 2027) along with Ekownu (second contract in the $15m range, and Lewis, whose contract would be in the $16m range if not extended.)  The OL cuts (Hunt, Moton) would save $40m.  The OL would get younger and still solid with veterans at G.   By cutting Wharton (no brainer if his play stays the same) and Moehrig (good player--but we have Ransom on a rookie contract who would not be that much of a drop off--if any) in addition to Hunt and Moton, we would save over $70m in cap room. We would be able to give Bryce bag  and we would have enough to re-sign Ickey (if the knee is not too risky) to a Guard contract (probably at a discount, coming off that injury).  Furthermore, we could add a RT in the draft (or a RG if Ickey moves to RT) and that would be the only large hole to fill. Correct my logic if you see issues-- On defense, in addition to the aforementioned, Scott ($2m contract) is out, replaced by a 4th round rookie contract. CB Jackson's contract ($7.8m) expires and he is (possibly) replaced by a rookie contract.  At Edge, patrick Jones II's $10m contract expires and he is likely a reserve, and his role is absorbed by Phillips, Scourton, Princely, and possible an UDFA like Isaiah Smith or a 2027 draft pick.   These productive developmental players over the past 2 drafts will pay huge dividends.  On paper, I see the team getting much younger and possibly better while cutting nearly $100m and reallocating that money to get more production.          
    • If everything played out and that last thing happened, I probably just quit. 
×
×
  • Create New...