Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Modern NFL offense vs Panthers offense


GoobyPls

Recommended Posts

MO - Use the pass to set up the run

Panthers - do the opposite 

MO - pass at “least” 30 times a game

Panthers - pass around 27 times a game

MO - run no huddle offense on a consistent basis

Panthers - never run no huddle

MO - snap the ball with 20 seconds on the clock 

Panthers - snap the ball with 1 second on the clock

MO - help their QBs get into rythym 

Panthers - hinder Cam rythym 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

In a game where people are obviously running bad routes, dropping balls and just generally not playing clutch,.. I think the game that was called was the game forced to be called.

Even Samuel dropped that sideline pass right in the chest on the last drive. Gano was the only "clutch" guy in the end.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 minutes ago, JARROD said:

The Falcons play "modern" football,.. how did that work out playing the Steelers and now having a 1-4 record and getting blown out?

 

 

All the Falcons best players are on IR literally. They have had about as worst luck as you can get but they are still scoring points. Even with their injuries this team would still have to beat  them in a shoot out for a win. That says a lot about us. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, JARROD said:

The Falcons play "modern" football,.. how did that work out playing the Steelers and now having a 1-4 record and getting blown out?

 

 

And we lost to them. 

 

Guess what type of offense won last year SB or the year before.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • First, am I wrong? I looked back over all his posts here and I didn't see anything positive other than Shough. Second, pretty sure if you had read the post I was responding to, you would have seen CRA made poo personal as well . You just choose to address me instead of him. Not sure why?????
    • I wanted XL but I felt he should have been a 2nd rounder but I understand the logic trading up just to get the option. A safety net for your gamble.    Certainly disappointed with his receivers development but i like his down field blocking and I imagine that's what's keeping him on the field. 
    • Pretty sure it is a given Young lacks typical QB size and strength and he is here simply because his other attributes more than make up for it. My point is not to indicate anyone "settled" for him but rather to remind people that there have been plenty of big, strong QB's that have not lived up to expectations. Jamis Winston, Anthony Richardson, Trey Lance, JaMarcus Russel are a few examples. They all have the physical attributes coveted by teams and yet none have had sustained success in the NFL. And yes, there are QBs that do have both but there aren't many and some of the ones still playing were failures with their early teams. Saying Young is a bust simply based upon his size (and I do think it is as simple as that for a few guys around here) is unfair to both him and the team.
×
×
  • Create New...