Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Should we lock up Chris Clark Now


DaveThePanther2008

Recommended Posts

The guy may not be spectacular but he has done a great job.

Considering the whole OL didn't give up one sack to the team leading the league in sacks and the No. 1 Rated defense in the NFL.  That says a lot.

His veteran leadership and solid play has turned our shaky OL start into a solid unit.

I think Marty needs to get on the phone with his agent and hammer out a deal before the end of the season.   It will suck if we resurrect his career and he moves on to another team because we failed to lock him up. 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Even if Clark was good enough to be worth locking up, which he isn't, he's 33 years old.  He's just a one year rental.  We're gonna either have to re-sign Williams or look into drafting a LT in the 2nd-4th round next year.  I would say 1st but I think we need to target a pass rusher in the 1st this year, depending on where we're picking.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Idk, maybe. Folks keep mentioning his age, but looking across the league, age aint what it use to be. 33 is the new 30. 

Part of the reason we passed on Whitworth was because of age, he's still ballin. Not to say Clark is on that level, just saying giving him a 2 yr deal after the year may not be the worst decision. Let's see how he performs down the stretch.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, emhoward said:

Idk, maybe. Folks keep mentioning his age, but looking across the league, age aint what it use to be. 33 is the new 30. 

Part of the reason we passed on Whitworth was because of age, he's still ballin. Not to say Clark is on that level, just saying giving him a 2 yr deal after the year may not be the worst decision. Let's see how he performs down the stretch.

Daryl Williams is a pending free agent though and he's a much better OT and much younger. The only reason that we should even entertain the idea of letting him walk is if our medical team is red flagging his knee going forward.

Moton and Williams is the future. That's our starting OT tandem for the rest of Cam's prime. The answer actually is on the roster this time.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I understand the age thing.  And Moton and Williams are our future (providing Williams signs with us) 

If Williams signs elsewhere and we let Clark go somewhere else(and he will), then what.  We are stuck again with M. Kalil at LT.

Emhoward is also correct age shouldn't be a major factor if the guy is balling out.  Give him a deal that we can get out of easily if his production starts to fall off. 

@emhoward 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Good Lord this board has become a cesspool of negativity and where fandom becomes something twisted and unrecognizable.  
    • Yeah, I could jump right into the unbelievable Bryce debate now that some people are trying to flip the script because Bryce Young has, at most, a handful of decent games as a pro, but that's going to work itself out. Suffice it to say that I've seen better QBs (with an s) in a Panthers uniform, and I've certainly seen better QBs be drafted while we're playing around with Bryce, one of them who beat the crap out of us already this season... Let's forget about Bryce (and his markedly underwhelming play since he's been here); I think that most sane fans will agree that drafting him was an error, but it happens. Sure, it doesn't happen to the tune of King's ransom---including your main receiver---but it happens. You bet, you lose. Speaking of receivers...and betting and losing... Oh, man, we drafted Xavier Legette. Yes, just like with Bryce, I've entered "the dark side." Some Huddlers were telling us from the beginning, and they were right. But, I'm not apologizing for waiting to see what a guy's got before making my decision on him. X was a one-year wonder at South Carolina who parlayed some really nice production that season, a great personality and thick country accent, into becoming a first round pick (but only in Carolina). For Dan Morgan and company, He was a big swing that has turned into a big whiff (and I can still feel the ill breeze from that one). Sh¡t happens, right? Well, not so fast. Ladd McConkey was the decidedly more polished receiver who was literally ready to hit the ground running as soon as stepping onto the field as a pro. Ladd was never the biggest guy (though not the smallest), but he was the guy that could run routes, always seemed to get open---no question---and had the same speed as X, but with legit quickness and nuanced shake and bake. But Dan chose the project. He chose the guy where the game speed looks more like a tractor trailer than a 5.0 mustang. Look, I've supported X (just like Bryce) many many a day, but no more. Now I'm not saying that I won't root for the guy. Just like with Bryce, he seems like a great kid. But as far as giving excuses for the kid, and, perhaps more importantly, waiting for some miraculous breakout, I'm done with that. I've seen enough. You don't draft a project for a project. And yes, Bryce had proven to be a project after his first season. In my mind, drafting a supposedly number one receiver that needs lots of development for a starting quarterback that needs immediate help to try and further his development is not going to lead to good things. Pick the surest guy. Or at least pick the one who appears to be the surest guy, because picking can be tricky... especially when you're too busy tricking yourself. 
    • Winning ain't gonna make my eyes lie to me. Context matters, and it will always matter in the game of football.
×
×
  • Create New...